Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical bases of differences between the sedimentometric and laser-diffraction techniques of soil particle-size analysis

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparison of the particle-size distributions in different soils showed that the sedimentation method (Kachinskii pipette method) gives higher (by 1.5–5 times) values of the clay content than the laser diffraction method. This is related to the significant variation in density of soil solids, which is taken to be constant in the sedimentation method. Therefore, particles of significantly larger size and lower density fall into this fraction. Using optical, electron, and confocal microscopy, it was shown that the low density of soil particles of silt size falling into the sedimentometric clay fraction is related to the organomineral shell (film) around the soil microparticles. This shell contributes to the linking of microparticles into aggregates at the lower average density. As a result, these aggregates have significantly larger size and lower density and settle with the same velocity as the small particles with the average density of the solid phase during the sedimentation particle-size analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. D. Voronin, Basics of Soil Physics (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. N. Grigorov, I. F. Karpova, Z. P. Koz’mina, et al., Manual for Practical Work in Colloidal Chemistry (Khimiya, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. V. Dobrovol’skii, B. V. Sheremet, T. V. Afanas’eva, and L. A. Palechek, Soils: Encyclopedia of Russian Nature (AVF, Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. F. Efremov, Periodic Colloidal Structures (Khimiya, Leningrad, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. R. Zaidel’man, Soil Reclamation (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow) [in Russian].

  6. V. S. Ivanova, A. S. Balankin, I. Zh. Bunin, and A. A. Oksogoev, Synergetics and Fractals in Materials Science (Nauka, Moscow, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luminescence Analysis, Ed. by M. A. Konstantinova-Shlesinger (Moscow, 1961) [in Russian].

  8. A. B. Molov, E. Yu. Milanovskii, and Z. N. Tyugai, “Studying the Structure of Water-Stable Aggregates by Laser Diffraction,” in Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference “Experimental Studies in Soil Science: Theory and Methods of Standardization,” Moscow, 2005 (Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

  9. G. N. Fedotov, Yu. D. Tret’yakov, G. V. Dobrovol’skii, et al., “Colloidal Structures in Soils,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 404(3), 352–354 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. N. Fedotov, Yu. D. Tret’yakov, and A. I. Pozdnyakov, “Residual Polarization under Unstable Infiltration of Water through Colloidal Soil Structures,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 392(3), 350–355 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. N. Fedotov, Yu. D. Tret’yakov, A. I. Pozdnyakov, et al., “Effect of the Colloidal Structure of Organomineral Gel on Soil Properties,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 394(2), 212–214 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. V. Shein, T. A. Arkhangel’skaya, V. M. Goncharov, et al., Field and Laboratory Methods to Study the Physical Properties and Regimes of Soils (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. V. Shein and L. O. Karpachevskii, Explanatory Dictionary in Soil Physics (GEOS, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. V. Shein, Lecture Course on Soil Physics (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Eggel’smann, Manual on Drainage (Kolos, Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bohren, C.F. and Huffman, D. R., Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1998), p. 519.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Eshel, G. J. Levy, U. Mingelgrin, and M. J. Singer “Critical Evaluation of the Use of Laser Diffraction for Particle-Size Distribution Analysis,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 736–743 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Konert and J. Vandenberghe, “Comparison of Laser Grain Size Analysis with Pipette and Sieve Analysis: a Solution for the Underestimation of the Clay Fraction,” Sedimentology 44, 523–535 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Jonasz, “Size, Shape, Composition, and Structure of Microparticles from Light Scattering,” in Principles, Methods, and Applications of Particle Size Analysis, Ed. by J. P. M. Syvitski (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991), pp. 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Lehneer, G. Kellner, H. Scnablegger, and O. Glatter, “Static Light Scattering on Dense Colloidal Systems: New Instrumentation and Experimental Results,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 201, 34–47 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. D. Matthews, “The Effect of Grain Shape and Density on the Size Measurement,” in Principles, Methods, and Applications of Particle Size Analysis, Ed. by J.P.M. Syvitski (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991), pp. 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © G.N. Fedotov, E.V. Shein, V.I. Putlyaev, T.A. Arkhangel’skaya, A.V. Eliseev, E.Yu. Milanovskii, 2007, published in Pochvovedenie, 2007, No. 3, pp. 310–317.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fedotov, G.N., Shein, E.V., Putlyaev, V.I. et al. Physicochemical bases of differences between the sedimentometric and laser-diffraction techniques of soil particle-size analysis. Eurasian Soil Sc. 40, 281–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229307030064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229307030064

Keywords

Navigation