Skip to main content
Log in

Admittance Space Geometry of N-Layer Dielectric Structures and Synthesis Problems

  • TO THE 75th ANNIVERSARY OF MIREA—RUSSIAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
  • Published:
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that the level of analytical modeling direct problems of electrodynamics of layered dielectric structures (LDSs) is seriously lagging behind the needs of optimization filter synthesis problems and inverse problem solving in this field. In this paper, we consider the problem formulation of synthesizing a \(\left[ {{{\mathcal{K}}_{1}},{{\mathcal{K}}_{2}}} \right]\) band-pass optical filter based on the ideal of its energy reflection coefficient \(\tilde {R}\left( \kappa \right)\) specified in the wavenumber band in the \(\mathbb{C}\left[ {{{\mathcal{K}}_{1}},{{\mathcal{K}}_{2}}} \right]\) space metric. This problem statement is simplified and supplemented with conditions that are important for practice for the system admittances of \(\vec {p}\mathop = \limits^{{\text{def}}} \left( {{{p}_{1}}, \ldots ,{{p}_{N}}} \right)\), where \({{{\text{K}}}_{{\vec {p}}}}\mathop = \limits^{{\text{def}}} \left\{ {\hat {p} \leqslant {{p}_{j}} \leqslant \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{p} ,\left( {j = 1, \ldots ,N} \right)} \right\}\), to belong to the cube of allowable admittances and electrical thicknesses of the system layers of \(\vec {\nu }\mathop = \limits^{{\text{def}}} \left( {{{\nu }_{1}}, \ldots ,{{\nu }_{N}}} \right)\) to the parallelepiped \({{{{\Pi }}}_{{\vec {\nu }}}}\mathop = \limits^{{\text{def}}} \left\{ {{{{\hat {\nu }}}_{j}} \leqslant {{\nu }_{j}} \leqslant {{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{\nu } }}_{j}},\left( {j = 1, \ldots ,N} \right)} \right\}\) of LDS thickness restrictions. The interaction between the structures of the electrodynamic parameter spaces of the \({{\mathcal{P}}_{N}}\mathop = \limits^{{\text{def}}} \left\{ {\vec {p}} \right\}\) admittances and the \({{\mathcal{N}}_{N}}\mathop = \limits^{{\text{def}}} \left\{ {\vec {\nu }} \right\}\) electrical thicknesses of the LDS layers is studied, which was not performed until recently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We consider fields whose wave vector is normal to the layers of the system. For the case of oblique wave propagation, it suffices to make obvious changes to the constructions.

  2. These notations were introduced and substantiated in [1, 2].

  3. The transfer matrix is written for the case of the “right-to-left” operator action.

  4. We call the \(\vec {p},\vec {\nu }\) parameters electrodynamic since they are uniquely determined when solving the inverse problem of determining the LDS structure by specified amplitude reflection coefficient \(r\left( \omega \right)\) from LDS (see [4]).

  5. Functions of type \(\tilde {R}\left( \kappa \right)\) and \(\tilde {T}\left( \kappa \right)\) in this paper, as well as in [2], will be called ideals for the corresponding spectral characteristics physically realizable by a specific filter.

  6. At N > 2, the formulas for introducing exponential coordinates \(\vec {s} = \left( {{{s}_{1}}, \ldots ,{{s}_{N}}} \right)\) will change.

  7. Due to the abundance of information, the figures do not show the cube of admissible admittances KN, which, under the assumption that the admittance of the “substrate” pN + 1 is among the admissible ones and contains within itself a “singular point” II′ (see Figs. 1 and 2) of the degeneracy of the two-layer system to a 0-layer one.

  8. Graph structures in Fig. 1 historically follow Fig. 2, where we managed to identify and comprehend these structures and develop convenient notation.

  9. Through them, the most important properties of generating functions and coefficients of reflection and transmission of LDS, in particular, their average and extreme values, are analytically expressed.

REFERENCES

  1. Yu. I. Khudak, D. V. Parfenov, N. V. Muzylev, and T. S. Khachlaev, Ros. Tekhnol. Zh. 8 (5), 26 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. I. Khudak and D. V. Parfenov, J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 66, 1004 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. G. Kard, Analysis and Synthesis of Multilayered Interferential Films (Valgus, Tallinn, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. I. Khudak, Dokl. Math. 87, 112 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. I. Khudak, Dokl. Math. 93, 227 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. I. Khudak, Ros. Tekhnol. Zh. 5 (3), 3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Schuster, Annalen Phys. (Folge 6) 4 (5), 352 (1949).

  8. Yu. I. Khudak, I. A. Akhmedov, N. V. Muzylev, and D. V. Parfenov, Nelin. Mir, No. 2, 38 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. I. Khudak, I. A. Akhmedov, N. V. Muzylev, and D. V. Parfenov, Elektromagn. Volny & Elektron. Sist., No. 2, 24 (2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. I. Khudak.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they do not have conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Ivanov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khudak, Y.I., Parfenov, D.V. & Dzhioeva, M.I. Admittance Space Geometry of N-Layer Dielectric Structures and Synthesis Problems. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 67, 1319–1326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226922110031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226922110031

Navigation