Abstract
Electrostatic turning devices are electron- and ion-optical elements changing the direction of movement of a parallel monochromatic beam of charged particles by a given angle without affecting a beam’s parallelism. The trajectory similarity principle for electric fields homogeneous in Euler terms ensures the fulfillment of this property for the fields with a homogeneity of a zero power. The Donkin formula for 3D homogeneous harmonic functions produces extremely wide class of analytic expressions describing homogeneous electric potentials of a zero power. This paper considers the algorithm of synthesis of electrostatic turning devices that transform input parallel monochromatic beams into output parallel monochromatic beams. The algorithm is based on the Donkin formula and ensures beam stability for small deviations from the electric field’s symmetry plane.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this device, the input beam diverging with a small cone angle is not strictly parallel so that the telescopic turning device with field U(x, y, z) ~ arctan(x/z) produces an intermediate imaginary source with large input angles directly at the inlet of the energy analyzing region.
Accurate analysis shows that the continuity of the electric potential at boundaries is formally not required for the similarity principle either. The potential is a Euler homogeneous function on the right and on the left of the boundary. Therefore, after recalculation of the velocities of charged particles obeying the required proportion, the velocities and coordinates of particles crossing the infinitely thin boundary with an electric potential jump (see [25]) turn out to be in the same proportion that is required for similarity of the text fragments of trajectories.
Degenerate case f '(0) = 0 can also be of certain interest, but its analysis is beyond the scope of this article.
REFERENCES
P. G. Gabdullin, Yu. K. Golikov, N. K. Krasnova, and S. N. Davydov, Tech. Phys. 45, 232 (2000).
P. G. Gabdullin, Yu. K. Golikov, N. K. Krasnova, and S. N. Davydov, Tech. Phys. 45, 330 (2000).
G. M. Fikhtengol’ts, A Course of Differential and Integral Calculus (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2001), Vol. 1.
V. I. Smirnov, Advanced Mathematics Course (BKhV-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, 2008), Vol. 1.
A. S. Berdnikov, I. A. Averin, N. K. Krasnova, and K. V. Solov’ev, Vestn. Aktyubinskogo Reg. Gos. Univ. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 2, 147 (2016).
A. S. Berdnikov, I. A. Averin, N. K. Krasnova, and K. V. Solov’ev, Usp. Prikl. Fiz. 5 (1), 10 (2017).
A. S. Berdnikov, I. A. Averin, N. K. Krasnova, and K. V. Solov’ev, Vestn. Aktyubinskogo Reg. Gos. Univ. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 2, 17 (2016).
W. F. Donkin, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 147, 43 (1857).
W. F. Donkin, Proc. R. Soc. London 8, 307 (1856–1857).
E. W. Hobson, The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics (Chelsea Publ. Co., 1931).
E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis (AMS Press, 1944), Part II.
Yu. K. Golikov, Vestn. Aktyubinskogo Reg. Gos. Univ. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 2, 165 (2016).
Yu. K. Golikov, Vestn. Aktyubinskogo Reg. Gos. Univ. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, No. 2, 59 (2016).
Yu. K. Golikov, K. G. Utkin, and V. V. Cheparukhin, Calculation of Elements of Electrostatic Electron-Optical Systems: Study Guide (Leningr. Politekh. Inst., Leningrad, 1984).
L. N. Gall’ and Yu. K. Golikov, Nauchn. Priborostr. 24 (1), 11 (1987).
Yu. K. Golikov and N. K. Krasnova, Prikl. Fiz., No. 2, 5 (2007).
I. A. Averin, A. S. Berdnikov, and N. R. Gall, Tech. Phys. Lett. 43, 156 (2017).
Yu. K. Golikov and N. K. Krasnova, Theory of the Synthesis of Electrostatic Energy Analyzers (Politekh. Univ., St. Petersburg, 2010).
N. K. Krasnova, Doctoral Dissertation in Mathematics and Physics (St. Petersburg Polytechnic Univ., St. Peterburg, 2013).
Yu. K. Golikov, A. S. Berdnikov, A. S. Antonov, N. K. Krasnova, and K. V. Solov’ev, Tech. Phys. 63, 1659 (2018).
Yu. K. Golikov, N. A. Kholin, and T. A. Shorina, Nauchn. Priborostr. 19 (2), 13 (2009).
D. V. Grigor’ev, Candidate’s Dissertation in Mathematics and Physics (St. Petersburg State Technical Univ., St. Petersburg, 2000).
K. Siegbahn, N. Kholine, and G. Golikov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 384, 563 (1997).
A. S. Berdnikov and N. K. Krasnova, Nauchn. Priborostr. 25 (2), 69 (2015).
A. S. Berdnikov, Nauchn. Priborostr. 25 (1), 48 (2015).
N. K. Krasnova, Tech. Phys. 56, 843 (2011).
Yu. K. Golikov and N. K. Krasnova, Tech. Phys. 56, 164 (2011).
I. A. Averin and A. S. Berdnikov, Usp. Prikl. Fiz. 4 (1), 5 (2016).
Yu. K. Golikov, A. S. Berdnikov, A. S. Antonov, N. K. Krasnova, and K. V. Solov’ev, Tech. Phys. 63, 593 (2018).
W. von Koppenfels and F. Stallmann, Praxis der Konformen Abbildung (Springer, 1959).
M. A. Lavrent’ev and B. V. Shabat, Methods of the Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable (Nauka, Moscow, 1965).
V. I. Lavrik and V. N. Savenkov, Handbook on Conformal Mappings (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1970).
P. F. Fil’chakov, Approximate Conformal Mapping Methods (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1964).
V. M. Kel’man, S. P. Karetskaya, L. V. Fedulina, and E. M. Yakushev, Electron-Optical Elements of Prism Spectrometers for Charged Particles (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1979).
V. M. Kel’man, I. V. Rodnikova, and L. M. Sekunova, Static Mass Spectrometers (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1985).
http://simion.com.
http://wolfram.com/mathematica/.
http://www.getpaint.net.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the developers, researchers, and sponsors of site rspl.royalsocietypublishing.org (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London) whose selfless work has made it possible to freely operate with unique and rare references (in particular, publications [8, 9]).
Numerical calculations were performed using the SIMON 8.1 code [36]. In analytic calculations and verification of analytic expressions, as well as in preparing figures, we used Wolfram Mathematica program version 11 [37]. In editing figures, freely accessible program Paint.NET version 4 was used [38].
This research was completed using the ideas and rough manuscript copies of Prof. Yu.K. Golikov (without his direct participation). Therefore, responsibility for all inaccuracies and errors should be born exclusively by his coworkers.
The authors thank the reviewer for meticulous and profound work with great esteem to papers of Yu.K. Golikov (deceased). Thanks are also due to the reviewer for numerous useful remarks and for the wide scientific discussion in the form of anonymous exchange of letters (used in part in this study), which allowed us to considerably revise and improve the text.
Funding
This work was financed in part by state assignment no. 075-00780-19-00 for the Institute of Analytic Instrumentation, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors claim that there are no conflicts of interests.
Additional information
Translated by N. Wadhwa
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Golikov, Y.K., Berdnikov, A.S., Antonov, A.S. et al. Application of the Donkin Formula in the Theory of Reflecting and Turning Devices. Tech. Phys. 64, 1850–1865 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784219120089
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784219120089