Abstract
Metamorphic high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) structures based on deep In0.2Ga0.8As/In0.2Al0.8As quantum wells (0.7 eV for Γ electrons) with different metamorphic buffer designs are implemented and investigated for the first time. The electronic properties of metamorphic and pseudomorphic HEMT structures with the same doping are compared. It is found that, over a temperature range of 4–300 K, both the electron mobility and concentration in the HEMT structure with a linear metamorphic buffer are higher than those in the pseudomorphic HEMT structure due to an increase in the depth of the quantum well. Low-temperature magnetotransport measurements demonstrate that the quantum momentum-relaxation time decreases considerably in metamorphic HEMT structures because of enhanced small-angle scattering resulting from structural defects and inhomogeneities, while the dominant scattering mechanism in structures of both types is still due to remote ionized impurities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
S. Chaturvedi, S. L. Badnikar, and A. A. Naik, in Proceedigns of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and RF Conference, Ahmedabad, India, 2017.
K. Wang, Y. Yan, and X. Liang, in Proceedigns of the 2018 IEEE MTT-S International Wireless Symposium, Chengdu, China, 2018.
T. Paul, M. Harinath, and S. K. Garg, in Proceedigns of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and RF Conference, Ahmedabad, India, 2017.
M. Kasu, S. Fujita, and A. Sasaki, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3042 (1989).
N. Chand, T. Henderson, J. Klem, W. Ted Masselink, R. Fischer, Y.-C. Chang, and H. Morkoc, Phys. Rev. B 30, 4481 (1984).
M. E. Rudinsky, S. Yu. Karpov, H. Lipsanen, and A. E. Romanov, Mater. Phys. Mech. 24, 278 (2015).
H. Sari and H. H. Wieder, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3380 (1999).
P. M. Mooney, J. Appl. Phys. 67, R1 (1990).
A. Malinin, H. Tomozawa, T. Hashizume, and H. Hasegawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1138 (1995).
S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III–V Semiconductor Compounds: InP, InAs, GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1992).
I. Vurgaftman, J. R. Meyer, and L. R. Ram-Mohan, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815 (2001).
I. S. Vasil’evskii, G. B. Galiev, E. A. Klimov, V. G. Mokerov, S. S. Shirokov, R. M. Imamov, and I. A. Subbotin, Semiconductors 42, 1084 (2008).
R. T. Webster, S. Wu, and A. F. M. Anwar, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 21, 193 (2000).
G. Berthold, E. Zanoni, C. Canali, M. Pavesi, M. Pecchini, M. Manfredi, S. R. Bahl, and J. A. del Alamo, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 42, 752 (1995).
K. Kalna and A. Asenov, Solid-State Electron. 48, 1223 (2004).
P. Win, Y. Cordier, Y. Druelle, C. Bouillet, J. Favre, and A. Cappy, Microelectron. Eng. 19, 317 (1992).
V. A. Kulbachinskii, L. N. Oveshnikov, R. A. Lunin, N. A. Yuzeeva, G. B. Galiev, E. A. Klimov, and P. P. Mal’tsev, Semiconductors 49, 199 (2015).
N. A. Yuzeeva, A. V. Sorokoumova, R. A. Lunin, L. N. Oveshnikov, G. B. Galiev, E. A. Klimov, D. V. Lavruchin, and V. A. Kulbachinskii, J. Low Temp. Phys. 185, 701 (2016).
E. Diez, Y. P. Chen, S. Avesque, M. Hilke, E. Peled, D. Shahar, J. M. Cervero[acute], D. L. Sivco, and A. Y. Cho, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 052107 (2006).
D. Yu. Protasov and K. S. Zhuravlev, Solid-State Electron. 129, 66 (2017).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was performed in the framework of State assignment (no. 8.3887.2017/PCh).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by M. Skorikov
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vinichenko, A.N., Safonov, D.A., Kargin, N.I. et al. Electron-Quantum Transport in Pseudomorphic and Metamorphic In0.2Ga0.8As-Based Quantum Wells. Semiconductors 53, 339–344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063782619030205
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063782619030205