Skip to main content
Log in

Calculations of Scalaron Decay Probabilities

  • ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS/Theory
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The particle production through the scalaron decays is considered for several different channels. The central part of the work is dedicated to a study of the decay probability into two complex minimally coupled massless scalars. The calculations are performed by two different independent methods. In addition we calculated the decay probability into real minimally coupled massless scalars, conformally coupled massive scalars, massive fermions, and gauge bosons. The results are compared with the published papers which in some cases disagree with each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Faulkner, M. Tegmark, E. F. Bunn, and Y. Mao, Phys. Rev. D 76, 063505 (2007); astro-ph/0612569.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. V. L. Ginzburg, D. A. Kirzhnits, and A. A. Lyubushin, Sov. Phys. JETP 33, 242 (1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. D. Dolgov and Ya. B. Zeldovich, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 1 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Arbuzova, A. Dolgov, and R. Singh, Symmetry 13, 877 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. V. Arbuzova, A. D. Dolgov, and R. S. Singh, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 019 (2018); arXiv: 1803.01722 [gr-qc].

  7. A. D. Dolgov and S. H. Hansen, Nucl. Phys. B 548, 408 (1999); hep-ph/9810428.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. Dolgov and K. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2693 (1995); hep-ph/9410346.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. V. Arbuzova, A. D. Dolgov, and L. Reverberi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 049 (2012); arXiv: 1112.4995 [gr-qc].

  10. D. S. Gorbunov and A. G. Panin, Phys. Lett. B 700, 157 (2011); arXiv: 1009.2448 [hep-ph].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2511 (1985).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Grib, S. G. Mamayev, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Vacuum Quantum Effects in Strong Fields (Friedmann Labor., St. Petersburg, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 172 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Bambi and A. D. Dolgov, Introduction to Particle Cosmology (Springer, UNITEXT for Physics, 2015).

  15. L. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 562 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Parker, Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. D. Dolgov, Sov. Phys. JETP 54, 223 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. G. F. Giudice, M. Peloso, A. Riotto, and I. Tkachev, J. High Energy Phys. 9908, 014 (1999); hep-ph/9905242.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant no. 22-12-00103.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Rudenko.

Ethics declarations

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Appendices

Appendix

DESCRIPTION OF FERMIONS IN FLRW SPACE–TIME

Fermions in curved space–time are usually described in the tetrad formalism which is particularly simple for FLRW space–time. It is the conformally flat metric, which means that after introduction of conformal time (19) it is transformed into the form proportional to the flat Minkowski metric (20). Under this transformation Dirac equation for massless fermions becomes identical to the equation in flat space–time. So one can conclude that massless fermions cannot be produced by conformally flat gravitational field [15, 16].

In this section we calculate the probability of massive fermion production in FLRW metric following [14, 18]. The action for fermionic field \(\psi\) can be written as

$$S[\psi]=\int d^{4}x\sqrt{-g}\bar{\psi}\left(i\Gamma^{\mu}\nabla_{\mu}-m_{\psi}\right)\psi,$$
(A.1)

where \(\sqrt{-g}=a^{3}\) is the metric determinant, \(\Gamma^{\mu}\) is a generalization of the Dirac \(\gamma^{\mu}\) matrices for curved space–time. In the FLRW metric they have the form \(\Gamma^{0}=\gamma^{0}\) and \(\Gamma^{i}=\gamma^{i}/a\) (\(i=1,2,3\)). They satisfy the anticommutation relations \(\{\Gamma^{\mu},\Gamma^{\nu}\}=2g^{\mu\nu}\), while \(\gamma^{\mu}\) are the usual Dirac matrices, obeying the anticommutation relation \(\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\}=2\eta^{\mu\nu}\). \(\nabla_{\mu}\) is the covariant derivative for the spin-1/2 field. In the FLRW metric it is equal to \(\nabla_{\mu}=\partial_{\mu}+(3/2)(\partial_{\mu}a)/a\).

The conformally transformed fermion field is defined as

$$\psi_{\textrm{conf}}=a^{3/2}\psi.$$
(A.2)

In terms of conformal time \(\eta\) and field \(\psi_{\textrm{conf}}\) the action takes the form:

$$S[\psi_{\textrm{conf}}]=\int d^{3}xd\eta\bar{\psi}_{\textrm{conf}}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m_{\psi}a\right)\psi_{\textrm{conf}}.$$
(A.3)

It is the action of a free fermion field in conformal coordinates with mass \(m_{\textrm{eff}}=m_{\psi}a(\eta)\).

The time dependence of the scale factor can be found from Eq. (3), see also Eq. (73):

$$a=a_{0}\left(\frac{t}{t_{0}}\right)^{2/3}\exp\left[\frac{2}{3}\int\limits_{t_{0}}^{t}\frac{dt^{\prime}}{t^{\prime}}\sin\left(M_{R}t^{\prime}\right)\right]$$
$${}\approx a_{0}\left(\frac{t}{t_{0}}\right)^{2/3}\left[1-\frac{2}{3M_{R}t}\cos\left(M_{R}t\right)\right],$$
(A.4)

where we have omitted unessential phase \(\theta\) and kept the main oscillating term, which is responsible for fermion production.

If we neglect the small and decreasing oscillating term, the scale factor as a function of \(t\) evolves as:

$$a_{\textrm{bg}}=a_{0}\left(\frac{t}{t_{0}}\right)^{2/3}.$$
(A.5)

Here the subindex ‘‘bg’’ means background to distinguish it from total scale factor (A.4). Therefore,

$$V=m_{\psi}a\to\frac{2m_{\psi}a_{\textrm{bg}}}{3M_{R}t}\cos\left(M_{R}t\right).$$
(A.6)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arbuzova, E.V., Dolgov, A.D. & Rudenko, A.S. Calculations of Scalaron Decay Probabilities. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 86, 266–276 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823030031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823030031

Navigation