Skip to main content
Log in

New Measurements of Internal Conversion Coefficients in \({}^{{111}}\)Cd

  • Nuclei/Theory
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 7.5-day beta decay of \({}^{111}\)Ag is studied with a 60 cc HPGe gamma spectrometer system and a high transmission Mini-Orange magnetic spectrometer. Precise gamma energies and relative intensities of fourteen gamma transitions and conversion electron intensities of sixteen conversion lines of eleven gamma transitions have been determined. Normalized Peak to Gamma method has been used for the determination of \(K\) and \(L\) conversion coefficients of most of the gamma transitions in \({}^{111}\)Cd for the first time, and compared with the theoretical values for assignment of multipolarities. The present conversion electron intensities would be of great use for calibrating electron detectors and electron transporters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. S. Kisslinger and R. A. Sorenson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 853 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. McDonald and D. Porter, Nucl. Phys. A 109, 529 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Nica, J. C. Hardy, V. E. Iacob, T. A. Werke, C. M. Folden, III, L. Pineda, and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034305 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. R. Burmistov and V. A. Didorenko, in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Nuclear Spectroscopy and Nuclear Structure, Kharkov (1974), p. 73.

  5. G. A. Shevelev, A. G. Troitskaya, and V. M. Kartashov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 39, 2038 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Goswamy, B. Chand, D. Mehta, N. Singh, and P. N. Trehan, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 43, 1467 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Blachat, Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 1239 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Table of Radioactive Isotopes, Ed. by E. Browne and R. B. Firestone (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. M. Langer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 20, 216 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Petkov and N. Bakaltchev, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 23, 138 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gamma Vision-32, Version 5.10 (EG&G, ORTEC, 1998).

  12. M. Sainath, K. Vijay Sai, D. Rao, D. Seetharaman, and K. Venkataramaniah, J. Nucl. Phys. Mater. Sci. Rad. A 8, 25 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Deepa, K. Vijay Sai, R. Gowrishankar, and K. Venkataramaniah, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 126 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Kibedi, T. W. Burrows, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, P. M. Davidson, and C. W. Nestor, Jr., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 589, 202 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Raman, M. Ertugrul, C. W. Nestor, Jr., and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 92, 207 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. L. Dunford and R. R. Kinsey, Evaluated Nuclear Structure Drawings and Tables, Program Package Version 12.13, ENSDAT(2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Program package GTOL, ENSDAT, Version 3.92, NNDC, BNL.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Venkataramaniah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madhusudhana Rao, K., Vijay Sai, K., Rajasekhar, E. et al. New Measurements of Internal Conversion Coefficients in \({}^{{111}}\)Cd. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 84, 817–825 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821130287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821130287

Navigation