Skip to main content
Log in

Cluster radioactivity of 128–134Gd isotopes

  • Nuclei
  • Theory
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cluster radioactivity exhibited by 128–134Gd isotopes with the exotic emission of certain clusters like 4He, 8Be, 12C, 16O, 20Ne, 24Mg, and 28Si have been studied. The half-life values for different cluster emissions were calculated by considering the interacting potential barrier as a sum of Coulomb potential and proximity potential. The emission of 28Si cluster from 128Gd isotope leads to the formation of 100Sn daughter nucleus which is a doubly-magic nucleus. Hence, the 28Si cluster emission is expected to have the lowest half-life and therefore highly favorable for measurements. Our calculations also corroborate this point and thus emphasize the role of 100Sn in the exotic decay process. The Geiger-Nuttall plots for different cluster emissions were found to be linear, but with different slopes and intercepts. We have studied the variation of these slopes and intercepts as a function of the proton number of clusters. Based on this, we have arrived at a handy and convenient expression for half-life values for emissions of various clusters from 128–134Gd isotopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Sandulescu, D. N. Poenaru, and W. Greiner, Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 11, 1334 (1980) [Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 11, 528 (1980)].

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. J. Rose and G. A. Jones, Nature 307, 245 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. V. Alexandrov, A. F. Belyatsky, Yu. A. Glukhov, et al., JETP Lett. 40, 909 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. B. Price, J. D. Stevenson, S. W. Barwick, and H. L. Ravan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 297 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Hourani, M. Hussonnois, L. Stab, et al., Phys. Lett. B 160, 375 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S.W. Barwick, P. B. Price, and J. D. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. C 31, 1984 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. S. Malik and R. K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 39, 1992 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. N. Poenaru, M. Ivascu, A. Sandulescu, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 32, 572 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. Ts. Oganessian, V. L. Mikheev, and S. P. Tretyakova, Report No. E7-93-57, JINR (Dubna, 1993).

  10. Yu. Ts. Oganessian, Yu. A. Lazarev, V. L. Mikheev, et al., Z. Phys. A 349, 341 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Guglielmetti, R. Bonnetti, G. Poli, et al., Phys.Rev. C 52, 740 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Guglielmetti, B. Blank, R. Bonetti, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 583, 867 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. S. Malik. S. Singh, R. K. Puri, et al., Pramana-J. Phys. 32, 419 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. K. Gupta, S. Singh, R. K. Puri, and W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 47, 561 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kumar and R. K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 49, 1922 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Kumar, D. Bir, and R. K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1762 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. N. Poenaru, W. Greiner, and R. Gherghescu, Phys. Rev. C 47, 2030 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. P. Santhosh and A. Joseph, Pramana J. Phys. 55, 375 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. P. Santhosh and A. Joseph, Pramana J. Phys. 58, 611 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. P. Santhosh and A. Joseph, Pramana J. Phys. 62, 957 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. P. Santhosh, R. K. Biju, Sabina Sahadevan, and A. Joseph, Phys. Scr. 77, 065201 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Shivakumara swamy and T. K. Umesh, in Proceedings of the National Symposium on Nuclear Physics, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, India, 2008, p. 441.

  23. A. Joseph, K. M. Varier, K. K. Divya, and N. Indu, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nuclear Physics, BARC, India, 2009, p.206.

  24. S. Sahadevan and K. P. Santhosh, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nuclear Physics, BARC, India, 2009, p. 208.

  25. C. Qi, F. R. Xu, R. J. Liotta, et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 044326 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Blocki, W. J. Randrup, W. J. Swiatecki, and C. F. Tsang, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 105, 427 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Blocki and W. J. Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 132, 53 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Y.-J. Shi and W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A 438, 450 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. K. Umesh.

Additional information

The text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shivakumara swamy, G., Umesh, T.K. Cluster radioactivity of 128–134Gd isotopes. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 74, 675–680 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778811050218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778811050218

Keywords

Navigation