Abstract
Motivated by recent experimental data on dichloro-tetrakis thiourea-nickel (DTN) [Soldatov et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 104410 (2020)], a model of antiferromagnet on a tetragonal lattice with single-ion easy-plane anisotropy in the tilted external magnetic field is considered. Using the smallness of the in-plane field component, we analytically address field dependence of the energy gap in “acoustic” magnon mode and transverse uniform magnetic susceptibility in the ordered phase. It is shown that the former is non-monotonic due to quantum fluctuations, which was indeed observed experimentally. The latter is essentially dependent on the “optical” magnon rate of decay on two magnons. At magnetic fields close to the one which corresponds to the center of the ordered phase, it leads to experimentally observed dynamical diamagnetism phenomenon.
REFERENCES
S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).
F. Mila, Eur. J. Phys. 21, 499 (2000).
T. Giamarchi, C. Ruegg, and O. Tchernyshyov, Nat. Phys. 4, 198 (2008).
A. Zheludev and T. Roscilde, C. R. Phys. 14, 740 (2013).
A. Oosawa and H. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 65, 184437 (2002).
R. Yu, L. Yin, N. S. Sullivan, et al., Nature (London, U.K.) 489, 379 (2012).
D. Huvonen, S. Zhao, M. Mansson, T. Yankova, et al., Phys. Rev. B 85, 100410 (2012).
M. P. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, et al., Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).
L. Pollet, N. V. Prokof’ev, B. V. Svistunov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 140402 (2009).
A. Paduan-Filho, X. Gratens, and N. F. Oliveira, Phys. Rev. B 69, 020405 (2004).
S. A. Zvyagin, J. Wosnitza, C. D. Batista, et al., Phys. Rev. B 85, 047205 (2007).
A. V. Sizanov and A. V. Syromyatnikov, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 146002 (2011).
A. V. Sizanov and A. V. Syromyatnikov, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054445 (2011).
K. Y. Povarov, A. Mannig, G. Perren, et al., Phys. Rev. B 96, 40414 (2017).
A. Orlova, H. Mayaffre, S. Kramer, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 177202 (2018).
V. S. Zapf, D. Zocco, B. R. Hansen, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077204 (2006).
E. Batyev and L. Braginsky, Sov. Phys. JETP 69, 781 (1984).
E. Batyev, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 173 (1985).
L. Yin, J. S. Xia, V. S. Zapf, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 187205 (2008).
S. A. Zvyagin, J. Wosnitza, A. K. Kolezhuk, et al., Phys. Rev. B 77, 092413 (2008).
T. A. Soldatov, A. I. Smirnov, K. Y. Povarov, et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 104410 (2020).
A. S. Sherbakov and O. I. Utesov, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 518, 167390 (2021).
A. Lopez-Castro and M. R. Truter, J. Chem. Soc. 245, 1309 (1963).
T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
C. J. Hamer, O. Rojas, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. 81, 214424 (2010).
A. V. Sizanov and A. V. Syromyatnikov, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054445 (2011).
V. N. Glazkov, JETP Lett. 112, 647 (2020).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to A.I. Smirnov for stimulating discussions.
Funding
The reported study was supported by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by the authors
Appendices
APPENDIX A
HAMILTONIAN AT h x = 0
Here we briefly remind the basic technique, which was used in our previous study [22] (see also [12, 25]). Hamiltonian (1) can be transformed into bosonic one using conventional Holstein-Primakoff spin-operators representation [24] in the approximate form (which allows taking into account first 1/S corrections):
in a local coordinate frame, suitable for canted antifer-romagnetic order description [k0 = (π, π, π) is the AF vector]:
As a result we have \(\mathcal{H}\) = \(\sum\nolimits_{n = 0}^4 {{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}} \); each term contains n Bose-operators. Explicitly:
This term can be eliminated by taking proper canting angle θ, which depends on the external field. Next, the bilinear part is the following:
Here the Fourier transform of the exchange interaction reads
So, the magnon spectrum in the linear theory is given by:
Since the exchange interaction Fourier transform Jk obeys the property J0 = –\({{J}_{{{{{\mathbf{k}}}_{0}}}}}\), this spectrum is gapless with \({{\varepsilon }_{{{{{\mathbf{k}}}_{0}}}}}\) = 0 in agreement with the Goldstone’s theorem.
We also have the interaction part of the Hamiltonian. It consists of two terms, the first one is
where we denote k1, k2, k3 as 1, 2, 3, and the momentum conservation law reads
The second one is the following:
with the conventional momentum conservation law. Here
For nonlinear corrections to magnon spectrum analysis, it is convenient to use normal (Gk = 〈ak, \(a_{{\mathbf{k}}}^{\dag }\)〉ω) and anomalous (\(F_{k}^{\dag }\) = 〈\(a_{{ - {\mathbf{k}}}}^{\dag }\), \(a_{{\mathbf{k}}}^{\dag }\)〉ω) Green’s functions. The solution of the system of Dyson’s equation for these functions reads
where Σk, Πk are normal and anomalous self-energy parts, respectively. They can be calculated perturbatively.
APPENDIX B
CORRECTIONS TO THE HAMILTONIAN AT SMALL h x
When the external magnetic field is tilted, nonzero hx appears. It leads to uniform 〈Sx〉 component. In our theory, it is related to the parameter ρ. Nonzero ρ provides various additional terms in the Hamiltonian, which can be altogether denoted as δ\(\mathcal{H}\).
Linear terms δ\({{\mathcal{H}}_{1}}\) vanish when ρ is properly chosen.
The bilinear part of δ\({{\mathcal{H}}_{2}}\) can be divided onto normal and umklapp contributions (see Eqs. (12) and (13)). Explicit expressions for the corresponding coefficients in δ\(\mathcal{H}_{2}^{N}\) are the following:
These terms are analogous to the contributions in Eq. (A5). For δ\(\mathcal{H}_{2}^{N}\) the corresponding equations read
Importantly, the umklapps provide corrections to the normal and anomalous self-energy parts ρ2 (they are combined in pairs, see Fig. 4):
However, one can see that at the momentum k = k0 condition \({{X}_{{{{{\mathbf{k}}}_{0}}}}}\) = \({{Y}_{{{{{\mathbf{k}}}_{0}}}}}\) is satisfied, so \(\Sigma _{{{{{\mathbf{k}}}_{0}}}}^{U}\) = –\(\Pi _{{{{{\mathbf{k}}}_{0}}}}^{U}\). This means that there is no correction to the energy of magnon with k = k0 from the umklapp processes and only the normal terms are important in this context.
APPENDIX C
DERIVATION OF TRANSVERSE SUSCEPTIBILITY IN TILTED FIELD
Here, for calculations, it is also convenient to use normal and anomalous Green’s functions:
where k = (ω, k). These functions obey the following system of Dyson’s equations
where the bare Green’s function reads
After solving the system of equations (C.2) we obtain the following expression for normal and anomalous Green’s functions
Here the denominator reads
To calculate the susceptibility (19), it is necessary to use the retarded Green’s functions GR and FR, which are related to the causal ones (C.4) by the following relation:
and the same for F. The real parts of retarded functions are equal to the corresponding causal ones. So, we get
Using Eqs. (B.5) and (B.6) at k = 0 and Eq. (10), the real part of the uniform transverse spin susceptibility can be finally expressed as
where
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shcherbakov, A.S., Utesov, O.I. Easy-Plane Antiferromagnet in Tilted Field: Gap in Magnon Spectrum and Susceptibility. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 137, 80–88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776123070087
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776123070087