Abstract
The study of the polarization direction is crucial in the issue of restoring the spatial structure of the magnetic field in the active galaxy parsec-scale jets. But, due to relativistic effects, the magnetic field projected onto the celestial sphere in the source reference frame cannot be assumed to be orthogonal to the observed direction of the electric vector in the wave. Moreover, the local axis of the jet component may not coincide with its motion direction, which affects the observed polarization direction. In this article, we analyze the transverse to jet distributions of the electric vector in the wave, obtained as a result of modeling with different jet kinematic and geometrical parameters for a helical magnetic field with a different twist angle and for a toroidal magnetic field in the center, surrounded by a varying thickness sheath, penetrated by a poloidal field. We obtained: (1) the shape of the electric vector transverse distribution depends in a complex way on the angles of the jet axis and the velocity vector with the line of sight; (2) ambiguity in determining the twist direction of the helical magnetic field under using only the distributions of the electric vector in the wave; (3) both considered magnetic field topologies can reproduce both the “spine–sheath” polarization structure and individual bright features with the longitudinal to the jet axis polarization direction.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. Tchekhovskoy and O. Bromberg, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, L46 (2016).
R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433 (1977).
R. D. Blandford and D. G. Payne, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 199, 883 (1982).
C. M. Raiteri, M. Villata, M. I. Carnerero, J. A. Acosta-Pulido, et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 1837 (2019).
C. M. Raiteri and M. Villata, Galaxies 9, 42 (2021).
A. P. Marscher, Astrophys. J. 780, 87 (2014).
M. Lyutikov and E. V. Kravchenko, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 3876 (2017).
M. L. Lister and D. C. Homan, Astron. J. 130, 1389 (2005).
A. Pushkarev, Y. Kovalev, M. Lister, T. Savolainen, M. Aller, H. Aller, and M. Hodge, Galaxies 5, 93 (2017).
A. B. Pushkarev, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., submitted, arXiv:2209.04842.
M. Butuzova and A. Pushkarev, in Proceedings of the European VLBI Network Mini-Symposium and Users’ Meeting 2021, July 12–14, 2021 (2022), id. 5. https://pos.sissa.it/cgi-bin/reader/conf.cgi?confid99.
M. S. Butuzova and A. B. Pushkarev, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., submitted, arxiv: arXiv:2209.15359.
D. M. Christodoulou, D. C. Gabuzda, S. Knuettel, I. Contopoulos, D. Kazanas, and C. P. Coughlan, Astron. Astrophys. 591, A61 (2016).
S. Knuettel, D. Gabuzda, and S. O’Sullivan, Galaxies 5, 61 (2017).
A. B. Pushkarev, D. C. Gabuzda, Y. N. Vetukhnovskaya, and V. E. Yakimov, Astron. Rep. 49, 5 (2005).
R. A. Laing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 193, 439 (1980).
G. Ghisellini, F. Tavecchio, and M. Chiaberge, Astron. Astrophys. 432, 401 (2005).
M. L. Lister, M. F. Aller, H. D. Aller, D. C. Homan, et al., Astron. J. 146, 120 (2013).
M. L. Lister, D. C. Homan, K. I. Kellermann, Y. Y. Kovalev, A. B. Pushkarev, E. Ros, and T. Savolainen, Astrophys. J. 923, 30 (2021).
A. B. Pushkarev, Y. Y. Kovalev, M. L. Lister, and T. Savolainen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 4992 (2017).
M. S. Butuzova, Astron. Rep. 62, 116 (2018).
M. S. Butuzova, Astron. Rep. 62, 654 (2018).
M. S. Butuzova, Astropart. Phys. 129, 102577 (2021).
M. S. Butuzova and A. B. Pushkarev, Universe 6, 191 (2020).
M. S. Butuzova, Astron. Rep. 65, 635 (2021).
A. B. Pushkarev, T. Hovatta, Y. Y. Kovalev, M. L. Lister, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 545, A113 (2012).
T. Hovatta, M. L. Lister, M. F. Aller, H. D. Aller, D. C. Homan, Y. Y. Kovalev, A. B. Pushkarev, and T. Savolainen, Astron. J. 144, 105 (2012).
M. Lyutikov, V. I. Pariev, and D. C. Gabuzda, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 360, 869 (2005).
P. A. Hughes, H. D. Aller, and M. F. Aller, Astrophys. J. 341, 54 (1989).
D. C. Gabuzda, A. R. Reichstein, and E. L. O’Neill, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 172 (2014).
D. C. Gabuzda, S. Knuettel, and B. Reardon, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 2441 (2015).
D. C. Gabuzda, M. Nagle, and N. Roche, Astron. Astrophys. 612, A67 (2018).
D. C. Gabuzda, Galaxies 9, 58 (2021).
E. Murphy, T. V. Cawthorne, and D. C. Gabuzda, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 1504 (2013).
C. Prior and K. N. Gourgouliatos, Astron. Astrophys. 622, A122 (2019).
J. M. Hutchison, T. V. Cawthorne, and D. C. Gabuzda, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 321, 525 (2001).
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 21-12-00241.
Appendixes A and B, consisting only of figures, are given at the end of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Appendices
APPENDIX A
EV DISTRIBUTIONS FOR DIFFERENT MODEL PARAMETERS
Figure captions 5–17 for the article of Butuzova. Appendix A.
APPENDIX B
COMBINATIONS OF EV DISTRIBUTION SHAPES IN AN INDIVIDUAL JET
Figure captions 18–30 for the article of Butuzova. Appendix B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butuzova, M.S. The Observed Polarization Direction Depending on Geometrical and Kinematic Parameters of Relativistic Jets. Astron. Rep. 66, 845–871 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772922100031
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772922100031