Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteresis Interference of a Pulsed Magnetic Field in a Wave Transmitted through Metal

  • ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experimental dependences \(U(t)\) of electric voltage across a magnetic field transducer on time \(t\) are presented. The transducer scanned a discrete magnetic field sensor (DMFS) with records of pulsed magnetic fields that passed through aluminum plates with thicknesses of 0.015, 0.05, 0.055, 0.07, 0.09, 0.12, 0.165, 0.225, and 0.26 mm. The DMFS with plates was affected by the magnetic field pulses of a linear complex shaped inductor formed by varying the parameters of the elements of the electric circuit of the source and using delay lines. Hysteresis interference of a pulsed magnetic field in a transmitted wave is obtained for single plates and for plates as part of a massive object making it possible to increase the sensitivity of object thickness gauging by several times compared to hysteresis-free methods and to test objects in narrow gaps between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Fal'kevich, A.S. and Khusanov, M.Kh., Magnitograficheskii kontrol' svarnykh soyedinenii (Magnetographic Testing of Welded Joints), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1966.

  2. Kozlov, V.S., Tekhnika magnitograficheskoi defektoskopii (Magnetographic Nondestructive Testing Technique), Minsk: Vysheishaya Shkola, 1976.

  3. Mikhailov, S.P. and Shcherbinin, V.E., Fizicheskiye osnovy magnitograficheskoi defektoskopii (The Physical Basics of Magnetographic Nondestructive Testing), Moscow: Nauka, 1992.

  4. Gruzintsev, A.A. and Mikhailov, S.P., Self-consisted calculation of the magnetic field for problems of magnetic flaw detection, Part I: Initial model for calculating the field of a magnetic tape magnetized from a wire with a current, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2011, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Novikov, V.A., Kushner, A.V., and Shilov, A.V., Experimental study of magnetographic flaw inspection of objects during their magnetization with a movable permanent magnet through a magnetic carrier: I, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 507–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Using magnetic hysteresis for testing electroconductive objects in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2013, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 334–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S., and Pivovarov, V.L., Calculation of residual magnetic-field distributions upon hysteretic interference of a pulsed magnetic field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foerster, F., Nondestructive testing by the method of stray magnetic fields. Theoretical and experimental foundations for detecting surface defects of finite and infinite depth, Defektoskopiya, 1984, no. 12, pp. 13–18.

  9. Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S., and Pivovarov, V.L., Computer-assisted methods for finding pulsed magnetic-field distributions near current-conducting objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Hysteretic interference of time-overlapping magnetic field pulses, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 949–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Hysteretic interference of magnetic field of a moving linear inductor, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akulov, N.S. and Telesnin, R.V., USSR Inventor’s Certificate no. 452786, 1974.

  13. Afonin, A.M., Kiselev, V.N., Vakhromeev, Yu.I., and Pukhov, I.K., USSR Inventor’s Certificate no. 832443, 1981.

  14. Trunov, B.N., Dremimbko, Ya.G., Chervonenkis, A.Ya., and Balbashov, A.M., USSR Inventor’s Certificate no. 538392, Magneto-optical method of reproducing signals from a magnetic carrier, Byull. Izobret., 1976, no. 45.

  15. Terekhin, I.V. and Slavinskaya, E.A., Evaluating specific electrical conductivity of two-layered nonmagnetic objects by pulsed eddy-current method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, no. 4, pp. 286–292.

  16. Tamm, I.E., Osnovi teorii elektrichestva (Fundamentals of Electricity Theory), Moscow: Nauka, 1989.

  17. Slukhotski, A.E., Nemkov, V.S., Pavlov, N.A., and Bamuner, A.V., Ustanovki induktsionnogo nagreva (Induction Heating Installations), Leningrad: Energoizdat, 1981.

  18. Knoepfel, G., Pulsed High Magnetic Fields, Amsterdam–London: North-Holland, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Polivanov, K.M., Ferromagnetiki (Ferromagnets), Moscow–Leningrad: Gosenergoizdat, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Imaging electric signals of a magnetic field transducer with hysteretic interference for testing metals in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Doroshevich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S. Hysteresis Interference of a Pulsed Magnetic Field in a Wave Transmitted through Metal. Russ J Nondestruct Test 58, 130–139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922020061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922020061

Keywords:

Navigation