Skip to main content
Log in

Pulsed Magnetic Field near Metal Surface

  • ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experimental dependences \(H{\kern 1pt} \left( d \right)\) of the maximum strength of the secondary pulsed magnetic field near the surface of metal plates on their thickness obtained using a discrete magnetic field sensor (DMFS) and reduced to the primary source field strength are presented. The thickness of the plates varied from 0.015 to 2 mm. DMFS with aluminum and lead plates were subjected to magnetic field pulses of a linear inductor with a rise time from 5 to 60 μs. Arctangent analytical functions \(H{\kern 1pt} \left( d \right)\) have been found that are used to calculate the hysteresis interference of a pulsed magnetic field in a reflected wave in order to increase the sensitivity and accuracy of monitoring the thickness of metal objects, the specific electrical conductivity of their material, and continuity defects in them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Nondestructive testing of objects made of electroconductive materials in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 810–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S., and Pivovarov, V.L., Calculation of residual magnetic-field distributions upon hysteretic interference of a pulsed magnetic field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Imaging electric signals of a magnetic field transducer with hysteretic interference for testing metals in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Astakhov, V.I., Danilina, E.M., and Ershov, Yu.K., On the question of inspecting the plate with a crack by the eddy-current method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiselev, E.K. and Gol’dstein, A.E., Eddy-current system for testing inner diameter of pipes, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foerster, F., Nondestructive testing by the method of stray magnetic fields. Theoretical and experimental foundations for detecting surface defects of finite and infinite depth, Defektoskopiya, 1984, no. 12, pp. 13–18.

  7. Zhdanov, A.G., Shchukis, E.G., Lunin, V.P., and Stolyarov, A.A., Algorithms for pre-processing of eddy-current signals when inspecting heat-exchanger pipes of NPP steam generators, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pechenkov, A.N. and Scherbinin, V.E., Eddy currents and conducting and magnetizable spherical inclusions fields in a nonmagnetic medium, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sannikov, M.A., Influence of the curvature of the pipeline surface during diagnostics with eddy current devices, Kontrol’. Diagn., 2006, no. 9, pp. 24–27.

  10. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Hysteretic interference of time-overlapping magnetic field pulses, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 949–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Differential background of electric signal readfrom an induction magnetic head, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2021, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 706–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atavin, V.G., Uzkikh, A.A., and Iskhuzhin, R.R., Tuning out from base electric conductivity in conductive-coating thickness gauging, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lukhvich, A.A., Sharando, V.I., Shukevich, A.K., and Yanushkevich, K.I., Determination of the ferromagnetic component in stainless steels by the magnetodynamic method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 131–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lukhvich, A.A., Bulatov, O.V., and Luk’yanov, A.L., Testing thick nickel coatings applied on two-layer (nonferromagnet-ferromagnet) bases by magnetodynamic thickness gauges, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2014, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 187–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Testing for defects in pulsed magnetic field transmitted through metal, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2021, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 856–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sukhanov, D.Ya. and Sovpel’, E.S., Magnetic induction tomography of electrical circuits and devices, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., 2015, vol. 58, no. 10/3, pp. 73–75.

  17. Skvortsov, B.V., Samsonov, A.S., Borminskii, S.A., and Zhivonosnovskaya, D.M., Theoretical basics for inspection of conducting coatings in aircraft fuel tanks, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Doroshevich.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavlyuchenko, V.V., Doroshevich, E.S. Pulsed Magnetic Field near Metal Surface. Russ J Nondestruct Test 58, 983–991 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922700061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922700061

Keywords:

Navigation