Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Catastrophic Stage of Failure on Different Scales from Rock Sample to Coal Mine

  • Published:
Physical Mesomechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Doppler laser interferometry is used to measure the transient time between the slow quasi-stationary stage of damage accumulation in rock samples to the ultrafast catastrophic stage of failure as well as the duration of the autocatalytic stage of macroscopic fracture. Small rock samples are tested for compression and three-point bending, and the velocity of displacement of their lateral surfaces is measured up to macroscopic fracture. The surface velocity at the catastrophic stage proves to be three orders of magnitude higher than the average surface velocity at the quasi-stationary stage of damage accumulation. The transient time to catastrophic failure is estimated at 60–100 ms, and the duration of the ultrafast catastrophic failure stage is 15–20 ms for small marble samples. The transient stage is the process of self-organization of individual acts of fracture into the state of self-organized criticality. At this stage, the distribution of individual acts of fracture evolves into power-law distributions. A simple fracture model with power laws is proposed, which is in full agreement with the experimental data. The developed mathematical model is used to calculate fracture of small rock samples, reproducing uniaxial compression and three-point bending tests, as well as fracture in rock masses with mine openings. We also model the process of faulting and fracturing in the mountains of Central Altai, including the foreshock process, main event (the Chuya earthquake of September 27, 2003) and aftershock process. The calculated seismic process fully corresponds to the Gutenberg–Richter recurrence law, and the calculated aftershock process conforms to the Omori law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Makarov, P.V., Mathematical Theory of Evolution of Loaded Solids and Media, Phys. Mesomech., 2008, vol. 11, no. 5–6, pp. 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malinetskii, G.G. and Potapov, A.B., Modern Problems of Nonlinear Dynamics, Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2002.

  3. Makarov, P.V., Evolutionary Nature of Structure Formation in Lithospheric Material: Universal Principle for Fractality of Solids, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2007, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 558–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2007.06.003

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kocharyan, G.G., Kishkina, S.B., and Ostapchuk, A.A., Seismogenic Width of a Fault Zone, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2011, vol. 437, no. 2, pp. 412–415.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Makarov, P.V., Evolutionary Nature of Destruction of Solids and Media, Phys. Mesomech., 2007, vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Makarov, P.V., Self-Organized Criticality of Deformation and Prospects for Fracture Prediction, Phys. Mesomech., 2010, vol. 13, no. 5–6, pp. 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Makarov, P.V., Resonance Structure and Inelastic Strain and Defect Localization in Loaded Media, Phys. Mesomech., 2011, vol. 14, no. 5–6, pp. 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makarov, P.V. and Eremin, M.O., Rock Mass as a Nonlinear Dynamical System. Mathematical Modeling of Stress-Strain State Evolution in the Rock Mass around a Mine Opening, Phys. Mesomech., 2018, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerner, B.S. and Osipov, V.V., Autosolitons, Sov. Phys. Usp., 1989, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 101–138. https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1989v032n02ABEH002679

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Makarov, P.V., Eremin, M.O., and Kostandov, Yu.A., Prefracture Time of Gabbro Specimens in a Damage Accumulation Model, Phys. Mesomech., 2014, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Makarov, P.V. and Eremin, M.O., Fracture Model of Brittle and Quasibrittle Materials and Geomedia, Phys. Mesomech., 2013, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smolin, I.Yu., Makarov, P.V., Kulkov, A.S., Eremin, M.O., and Bakeev, R.A., Blow-up Modes in Fracture of Rock Samples and Earth’s Crust Elements, Phys. Mesomech., 2018, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, K., Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1987, vol. 59, pp. 381–384.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurdyumov, S.P., Blow-Up Modes: Evolution of the Idea, Malinetskii, G.G. (Ed.), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2006.

  15. Akhromeeva, T.S., Kurdyumov, S.P., Malinetskii, G.G., and Samarskii, A.A., Structures and Chaos in Nonlinear Media, Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007.

  16. Bak, P. and Paczuski, M., Complexity, Contingency and Criticality, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, vol. 92, pp. 6689–6696.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. EM–DAT: The OFDA/CRED Info Disaster Database. Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

  18. Kapitza, S.P., On the Theory of Global Population Growth, Phys.-Uspekhi, 2010, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1287– 1296.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garagash, I.A. and Nikolaevskii, V.N., Nonassociated Flow Rule and Plastic Strain Localization, Usp. Mekh., 1989, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 131–183.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Makarov, P.V. and Peryshkin, A.Yu., Slow Motions as Inelastic Strain Autowaves in Ductile and Brittle Media, Phys. Mesomech., 2017, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Novikov, I.S., Emanov, E.A., Leskova, V.A., Batalev, V.Yu., Rybin, A.K., and Bataleva, E.A., The System of Neotectonic Faults in Southeastern Altai: Orientations and Geometry of Motion, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2008, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 859–867.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogozhin, E.A., Ovsyuchenko, A.N., Marakhanov, A.V., and Ushanova, E.A., Tectonic Setting and Geological Manifestations of the 2003 Altai Earthquake, Geotectonics, 2007, vol. 41, pp. 87–104.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eremin, M.O., Makarov, P.V., and Peryshkin, A.Yu., Modeling of the Recent Evolution of the Folded Regions of Central Asia and Geodynamic Setting in the Baikal Rift Zone and in the Altai-Sayan Folded Region, in Tectonophysics and Urgent Problems of Earth Sciences: Proceedings, Moscow: Schmidt Institute of the Physics of the Earth RAS, 2012, pp. 280–284.

  24. Shapoval, A.B. and Shnirman, M.G., Universality of Algorithmic Prediction for Extremes of Time Series, Inform. Tekhn. Vychisl. Syst., 2011, no. 4, pp. 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Olami, Z., Feder, H.J.S., and Christensen, K., Self-Organized Criticality in a Continuous, Nonconservative Cellular Automaton Modelling Earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1244–1248.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 19-17-00122.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Makarov.

Additional information

Translated from in Fizicheskaya Mezomekhanika, 2020, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 43–55.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makarov, P.V., Smolin, I.Y., Peryshkin, A.Y. et al. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Catastrophic Stage of Failure on Different Scales from Rock Sample to Coal Mine. Phys Mesomech 24, 155–165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959921020053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959921020053

Keywords:

Navigation