Abstract
The objective of this research was to compare the microstructure and phase composition of wrought and 3D-printed Ti–5Al–3Mo–1V alloys subjected to quenching and aging. The microstructure of as-obtained wrought alloy and samples prepared by wire-feed electron beam additive manufacturing was studied using optical and scanning electron microscopy, as well as transmission electron microscopy. The phase and chemical compositions of wrought and 3D-printed samples were examined using electron backscatter diffraction and energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. X-ray diffraction analysis was used to study the martensitic structure of the Ti–5Al–3Mo–1V alloy samples subjected to quenching at temperatures of 900 and 950°C followed by aging at a temperature of 500°C. It was shown that the volume fraction of residual β‑phase in wrought and 3D-printed samples decreased during quenching, and a martensitic orthorhombic α′′-phase appeared. The formation of the α′′-phase in wrought samples after quenching was believed to be associated with the transformation of β → α′′ in bcc solute-lean interlayers. Quenching of the 3D-printed samples, in turn, promoted the formation of α′′-phase in α' laths which undergo α' → β → α" transformation. With the subsequent aging of the wrought and 3D-printed samples, the volume fraction of the α′′-phase decreased.
REFERENCES
R. A. Wood, E. R. Poulsen, and F. H. Froes, Titanium: Physical Metallurgy, Processing and Applications, (ASM Int., Amsterdam, 2015).
A. O. Mosleh, A. D. Kotov, V. Vidal, A. G. Mochugovskiy, V. Velayc, and A. V. Mikhaylovskaya, Mater. Sci. Eng. 802, 140626 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140626
F. Y. Hung and T. S Lui, J. Mater. Sci. 40, 3683 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-3310-z
S. P. Akula, M. Ojha, K. L. Rao, and A. K. Gupta, Mater. Today Commun. 34, 105343 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105343
A. Amirov, A. Chumaevskii, N. Savchenko, D. Gurianov, A. Nikolaeva, V. Krasnoveykin, A. Ivanov, V. Rubtsov, and E. Kolubaev, Metals 13, 222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/met13020222
M. X. Mukhametrakhimov, Lett. Mater. 7, 193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2017-2-193-197
V. N. Moiseyev, Titanium Alloys: Russian Aircraft and Aerospace Applications (CRC, Boca Raton, 2005).
B. Dutta and F.H. Sam Froes, Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015).
D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk, and C. Emmelmann, Acta. Mater. 117, 371 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019
N. V. Kazantseva, P. V. Krakhmalev, I. A. Yadroitsava, and I. A. Yadroitsev, Probl., Phys. Metals Metallogr. 122, 6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/s0031918x21010063
T. S. Singhal, J. K. Jain, and M. Kumar, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-01152-0
C. Li, Z. Y. Liu, X. Y. Fang, and Y. B. Gu, Procedia CIRP 71, 348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039
S.-G. Chen, H.-J. Gao, Y.-D. Zhang, Q. Wu, Z.-H. Gao, and X. Zhou, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 17, 2950 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.054
R. R. Boyer, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering (Wiley, London, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686652.eae198
A. V. Panin, M. S. Kazachenok, L. A. Kazantseva, S. A. Martynov, A. A. Panina, and T. A. Lobova, J. Surf. Invest.; X-ray, Synhrotron Neutron Tech. 16, 983 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451022060180
K. Osipovich, K. Kalashnikov, A. Chumaevskii, D. Gurianov, T. Kalashnikova, A. Vorontsov, A. Zykova, V. Utyaganova, A. Panfilov, A. Nikolaeva, A. Dobrovolskii, V. Rubtsov, and E. Kolubaev, Metals 13, 279 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/met13020279
E. A. Kolubaev, V. E. Rubtsov, and A. V. Chumaevsky, Phys. Mesomech. 25, 479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1029959922060017
I. C. Noyan and J. B. Cohen, Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation (Springer, New York, 2013).
P. Gao, M. Fu, M. Zhan, Z. Lei, and Y. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 39, 56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.052
S. Mironov, M. Murzinova, S. Zherebtsov, G. A. Salishchev, and S. L. Semiatin, Acta Mater. 57, 2470 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.016
C. J. Todaro, M. A. Easton, and D. Qiu, Nat. Commun. 11, 142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13874-z
O. B. Perevalova, A. V. Panin, and M. S. Syrtanov, J. Mater. Eng. Perf. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08675-x
C.-X. Li, H.-B. Luo, Q.-M. Hu, R. Yang, F.-X. Yin, O. Umezaw, and L. Vitos, Solid State Commun. 159, 70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.01.026
L. Zeng and T. R. Bieler, Mater. Sci. Eng. 392, 403 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.072
H. Jaber, J. Konya, K. Kulcsar, and T. Kovacs, Materials 15, 1978 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051978
J. Teixeira, D. Marechal, R. C. Wimpory, S. Denis, and F. Lefebvre, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 832, 142456 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142456
Funding
The work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 21-19-00795). The investigations were carried out using the equipment of the Shared Use Center “Nanotech” of the Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences and the Center for Sharing Use “Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies” of Tomsk Polytechnic University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panin, A.V., Lobova, T.A., Kazachenok, M.S. et al. The Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Phase Composition of Wrought and 3D-Printed Ti–5Al–3Mo–1V Titanium Alloy Samples. J. Surf. Investig. 17 (Suppl 1), S166–S173 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745102307039X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S102745102307039X