Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of the SEM-beam diameter using a relief structure: Influence of contamination

  • Published:
Journal of Surface Investigation. X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relief structures on plate surfaces are used to measure the diameter of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) beam. A contaminant film which alters the geometric parameters of the relief structure appears on its surface even in a high-vacuum SEM. It turns out that the film is deposited onto the surface nonuniformly, and there exist such regions of the film that remain almost unchanged after structure scanning for many hours. The discovered phenomenon is explained in this paper. The values of the beam diameter determined using these regions can be used to monitor the stability of a measuring SEM under conditions of relief-structure surface contamination. The beam diameter is determined using two models. In a model with an a priori unchanged beam form, the variation in the effective diameter value is ∼2 nm during long-term scanning. In a model with the recovery of the beam form, the diameter variation is larger; however, the character of the time dependence is similar to that observed for the effective value in the model with the unchanged beam form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. A. Grachev, E. A. Cheremukhin, and A. I. Chulichkov, Mat. Model. 15(3), 83 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Bunday and U. Kramer, Proc. SPIE 7272, 727204-1 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Babin, S. Cabrini, S. Dhuey, et al., Microelectron. Eng. 86, 624 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. E. Vladar, K. P. Purushotam, and M. T. Postek, Proc. SPIE 6922, 692217-1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ch. P. Volk, E. S. Gornev, Yu. A. Novikov, Yu. I. Plotnikov, A. V. Rakov, and P. A. Todua, Tr. Inst. Obshch. Fiz., Ross. Akad. Nauk 62, 77 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Relief Measures in Nanometer Range from Monocrystalline Silicon, RF Nation. Standard, GOST R 8.628.2007 (Standartinform, Moscow, 2007).

  7. Yu. A. Novikov, Yu. V. Ozerin, Yu. I. Plotnikov, A. V. Rakov, and P. A. Todua, Tr. Inst. Obshch. Fiz., Ross. Akad. Nauk 62, 36 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Program for Processing and Analysis of Microscope Images NDPL (2009). http://www.cmvsol.ru

  9. M. Tanaka, J. S. Villarrubia, and A. E. Vladar, Proc. SPIE 5752, 14 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Amman, J. W. Sleight, and D. R. Lombardi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, No. 14, 54 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. V. Larionov, V. B. Mityukhlyaev, and M. N. Filippov, J. Surf. Invest.: X-ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2, 727 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. V. Larionov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Yu.V. Larionov, 2014, published in Poverkhnost’. Rentgenovskie, Sinkhrotronnye i Neitronnye Issledovaniya, 2014, No. 11, pp. 51–60.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larionov, Y.V. Measurement of the SEM-beam diameter using a relief structure: Influence of contamination. J. Surf. Investig. 8, 1137–1145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451014050127

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451014050127

Keywords

Navigation