Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 46, Issue 11, pp 1314–1319 | Cite as

Efficiency of phenotypic and DNA markers for a genetic diversity study of alfalfa

  • M. TucakEmail author
  • S. Popović
  • T. Čupić
  • S. Grljušić
  • V. Meglič
  • Z. Jurković
Plant Genetics


Information on genetic diversity and germplasm characterization is essential for successful crop improvement. Diverse data sets (pedigree, morphological, biochemical, DNA based-markers) are employed in various aspects of plant analysis. The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of phenotypic and RAPD markers in diversity assessment of ten alfalfa (Medicago spp.) accessions from Europe, North America and Australia. Field experiment was designed as a randomised complete block with three replications over two consecutive years (2004, 2005) at one location. Twelve morpho-agronomic traits were recorded on 50 plants per each accession. Genomic DNA’s from 16–20 randomly selected individual plants per accession were used for RAPD analysis. Six primers selected in this study generated a total of 93 polymorphic RAPD bands. The number of polymorphic bands detected per primer ranged from 11 to 20. Genetic distances (GD) among investigated accessions and two-dimensional principal coordinate analysis (2D PCoA) based on phenotypic and molecular data were obtained. The average GD between (0.283–0.416) and within (0.247–0.332) accessions based on RAPD data was higher than GD values obtained by morpho-agronomic traits (0.171–0.354 and 0.157–0.261, respectively). 2D PCoA based on GD from RAPD data grouped most of the studied individual plants to four clusters according to their geographical or taxonomy origin. 2D PCoA based only on morpho-agronomic data did not group plants congruently to their origin, probably due to a strong environmental influence on studied traits. Our results indicated that the RAPD markers were effective in assessing genetic diversity within and between studied alfalfa accessions. In addition, the obtained results suggested that the RAPD markers might be useful for grouping of germplasm with similar genetic background and for pre-screening of potential heterotic groups in our breeding programme.


Polymorphic Band Medicago Sativa Randomise Complete Block Similar Genetic Background Taxonomy Origin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mohammadi, S.A. and Prasanna, B.M., Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Crop Plants-Salient Statistical Tools and Considerations, Crop Sci., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 1235–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barcaccia, G., Albertini, E., Tavoletti, S., et al., AFLP Fingerprinting in Medicago spp.: Its Development and Application in Linkage Mapping, Plant Breed., 1999, vol. 118, pp. 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crea, F., Calderini, O., Nenz, E., et al., Chromosomal and Molecular Rearrangements in Somatic Hybrids between Tetraploid Medicago sativa and Diploid Medicago falcata, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1997, vol. 95, pp. 1112–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riday, H. and Brummer, E.C., Forage Yield Heterosis in Alfalfa, Crop Sci., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christopher, M., Mace, E., Jordan, D., et al., Applications of Pedigree-Based Genome Mapping in Wheat and Barley Breeding Programs, Euphytica, 2007, vol. 154, pp. 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ceolin, A.C.G. and Goncalves-Vidigal, M.C., Vidigal Filho, P.S., et al., Genetic Divergence of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Group Carioca Using Morpho-Agronomic Traits by Multivariate Analysis, Hereditas, 2007, vol. 144, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prosperi, J.M., Jenczewski, E., Angevain, M., and Ronfort, J., Morphologic and Agronomic Diversity of Wild Genetic Resources of Medicago sativa L. Collected in Spain, Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 2006, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mosjidis, J.A., Greene, S.L., Klingler, K.A., and Afonin, A., Isozyme Diversity in Wild Red Clover Populations from the Caucasus, Crop Sci., 2004, vol. 44, pp. 665–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maras, M., Sunik, S., Vozli, J., and Megli, V., Temporal Changes in Genetic Diversity of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Accessions Cultivated between 1800 and 2000, Russ. J. Genet., 2006, vol. 42, pp. 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Savo Sardaro, M.L., Atallah, M., Tavakol, E., et al., Diversity for AFLP and SSR in Natural Populations of Lotus corniculatus L. from Italy, Crop Sci., 2008, vol. 48, pp. 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fufa, H., Baenziger, P.S., Beecher, B.S., et al., Comparison of Phenotypic and Molecular Marker-Based Classifications of Hard Red Winter Wheat Cultivars, Euphytica, 2005, vol. 145, pp. 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taran, B., Zhang, C., Warkentin, T., et al., Genetic Diversity among Varieties and Wild Species Accessions of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Based on Molecular Markers, and Morphological and Physiological Characters, Genome, 2005, vol. 48, pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geleta, N., Labuschagne, M.L., and Viljoen, C.D., Genetic Diversity Analysis in Sorghum Germplasm as Estimated by AFLP, SSR and Morpho-Agronomical Markers, Biodivers. Conserv., 2006, vol. 15, pp. 3251–3265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Z.P., Liu, G.S., and Yang, Q.C., A Novel Statistical Method for Assessing SSR Variation in Autotetraploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa), Genet. Mol. Biol., 2007, vol. 30, pp. 385–391.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flajoulot, S., Ronfort, J., Baudouin, P., et al., Genetic Diversity among Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Cultivars Coming from a Breeding Program, Using SSR Markers, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2005, vol. 111, pp. 1420–1429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gherardi, M., Mangin, B., Goffinet, B., et al., A Method to Measure Genetic Distance between Allogamous Populations of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Using RAPD Molecular Markers, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1998, vol. 96, pp. 406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Segovia-Lerma, A., Cantrell, R.G., Conway, J.M., and Ray, I.M., AFLP-Based Assessment of Genetic Diversity among Nine Alfalfa Germplasms Using Bulk DNA Templates, Genome, 2003, vol. 46, pp. 51–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    SAS Institute, SAS/STAT Users Guide Version 9.1, Cary: SAS Inst., 2003.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roldan-Ruiz, I., Eeuwijk, F.A., Gilliland, T.J., et al., A Comparative Study of Molecular and Morphological Methods of Describing Relationships between Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Varieties, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2001, vol. 103, pp. 1138–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rohlf, F.J., NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.2.b, New York: Applied Biostatistics, 2005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu, K. and Pauls, K.P., Rapid Estimation of Genetic Relatedness among Heterogeneous Populations of Alfalfa by Random Amplification of Bulked Genomic DNA Samples, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1993, vol. 86, pp. 788–794.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mengoni, A., Gori, A., and Bazzicalupo, M., Use of RAPD and Microsatellite (SSR) Variation to Assess Genetic Relationships among Populations of Tetraploid Alfalfa, Medicago sativa, Plant Breed., 2000, vol. 119, pp. 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horn, P. and Rafalski, A., Non-Destructive RAPD Genetic Diagnostics of Microspore-Derived Brassica Embryos, Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter, 1992, vol. 10, pp. 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mantel, N., The Detection of Disease Clustering and a Generalized Regression Approach, Cancer Res., 1967, vol. 27, pp. 209–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    IBPGR/84/191, International Board for Plant Genetic Resources: Forage Legume Descriptors, Rome: Commission of European Communities, Committee on Disease Resistance Breeding and Use of Gene Banks, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johns, M.A., Skroch, P.W., Nienhuis, J., et al., Gene Pool Classification of Common Bean Landraces from Chile Based on RAPD and Morphological Data, Crop Sci., 1997, vol. 37, pp. 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steiner, J.J. and Ios Santos, G.G., Adaptive, Ecology of Lotus corniculatus Genotypes: I. Plant Morphology and RAPD Marker Characterizations, Crop Sci., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 552–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Musial, J.M., Basford, K.E., and Irwin, J.A.G., Analysis of Genetic Diversity within Australian Lucerne Cultivars and Implications for Future Genetic Improvement, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 2002, vol. 53, pp. 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maureira, I.J., Ortega, F., Campos, H., and Osborn, T.C., Population Structure and Combining Ability of Diverse Medicago sativa Germplasms, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2004, vol. 109, pp. 775–782.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mari, S., Bolari, S., Martini, J., et al., Genetic Diversity of Hexaploid Wheat Cultivars Estimated by RAPD Markers, Morphological Traits and Coefficients of Parentage, Plant Breed., 2004, vol. 123, pp. 366–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greene, S.L., Gritsenko, M., and Vandemark, G., Relating Morphologic and RAPD Marker Variation to Collection Site Environment in Wild Populations of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.), Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 2004, vol. 51, pp. 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Tucak
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Popović
    • 1
  • T. Čupić
    • 1
  • S. Grljušić
    • 1
  • V. Meglič
    • 2
  • Z. Jurković
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Agricultural Institute OsijekOsijekCroatia
  2. 2.Agricultural Institute of SloveniaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Croatian Food AgencyOsijekCroatia

Personalised recommendations