Skip to main content
Log in

A new stage in the development of genetics and term epigenetics

  • Theoretical Papers and Reviews
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetics requires verification of the notion of gene. In this article, DNA and DNA parts are proposed to be named progenes, while the term gene refers to the informational products produced on DNA. These are RNA genes, protein genes, and DNA genes (transposable elements). The focus of genetics is switched today from characters of intraspecies difference to characters of intraspecies similarity. Regulatory genes controlling ontogeny (ontogenes) become the main object of research. These genes can be isolated by methods of both reverse and direct genetics. The properties of ontogene mutations, isolated by methods of direct genetics, are described. The problematic of epigenetics is related to the expression of ontogenes. The term epigenetics is not correct because of its ambiguity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maletskii, S.I., Epigenetika rastenii (sbornik nauchnykh trudov) (Epigenetics of Plants: Collection of Scientific Works), Novosibirsk: Inst. Tsitol. Genet. SO RAN, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Korochkin, L.I., On Epigenetics, Evolyutsionnaya biologiya (Evolutionary Biology), Stegnii, V.N., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2005, vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Voloshina, M.A., Hierarchy of Genetic Programs and Evolution, Filosofiya Nauki, 2005, no. 3, pp. 115–126.

  4. Zhimulev, I.F., Obshchaya i molekulyarnaya genetika (General and Molecular Genetics), Novosibirsk: Novosib. Univ., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maletskii, S.I., Evolyutsionnaya biologiya. Slovar’ terminov (Evolutionary Biology: Dictionary of Terms), Novosibirsk: Inst. Tsitol. Genet. SO RAN, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mendel, G., Versuche uber Pflanzen Hybriden, Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereins in Brunn, 1865, vol. 4, pp. 3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bateson, W., The Progress of Genetics since the Rediscovery of Mendel’s Paper, Progr. Rei. Bot., 1907, vol. I, p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johannsen, W., Elemente der Erblichkeitslehre, Jena: Fischer, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan, T.H., Bridges, C.B., and Sturtevant, A.H., The Genetics of Drosophila: Bibliographia Genetica II, ’s-Gravenhage Martinus Nijhoff, 1925.

  10. Ratner, V.A., Genetika, molekulyarnaya kibernetika: Lichnosti i problemy (Genetics, Molecular Cybernetics: Persons and Problems), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ashburner, M., Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chadov, B.F., Chadova, E.V., Khotskina, E.A., et al., The Main Effect of Chromosomal Rearrangement is Changing the Action of Regulatory Genes, Rus. J. Genet., 2004, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 723–731.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chadov, B.F. and Fedorova, N.B., Elementary Event of Ontogeny, Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk, 2003, vol. 389, no. 3, pp. 408–412.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eigen, M., Samoorganizatsiya materii i evolyutsiya biologicheskikh makromolekul (Self-Organization of Matter and Evolution of Biological Macromolecules), Moscow: Mir, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eigen, M. and Schuster, P., The Hypercycle, Berlin: Springer, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Korogodin, V.I. and Korogodina, V.L., Informatsiya kak osnova zhizni (Information as the Basis of Life), Dubna: Feniks, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chemavskii, D.S. and Chernavskaya, N.M., Generation of Valuable Information, Sovremennye problemy radiobiologii, radioekologii i evolyutsii (Current Problems of Radiobiology, Radioecology, and Evolution), Korogodin, V.I., Ed., Dubna: Ob. Inst. Yad. Issled., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chemavskii, D.S., Sinergetika i informatsiya (Synergetics and Information), Moscow: Znanie, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ivanov, V.I., Interaction of Genes Controlling the Processes of Cell Determination, Teoreticheskie problemy meditsinskoi genetiki (Theoretical Problems of Medical Genetics), Moscow, 1979.

  20. Chadov, B.F., The “Image” of the Regulatory Gene in Experiments with Drosophila, Rus. J. Genet., 2002, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 725–734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kondakov, N.I., Logicheskii slovar’-spravochnik (Logical Dictionary-Handbook), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chadov, B.F., Chadova, E.V., Kopyl, S.A., et al., From Genetics of Intraspecific Differences to Genetics of Intraspecific Similarity, Russ. J. Genet., 2004, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 945–948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chadov, B.F., Characters of Intraspecific Similarity and the Features of Mendelian Approach to Studying Heredity, Filosofiya Nauki, 2005, no. 3, pp. 94–114.

  24. Gaisinovich, A.E., Zarozhdenie i razvitie genetiki (The Emergence and Development of Genetics), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mëller, H., The Problem of Gene Variability, H. Mëller: Izbrannye raboty po genetike (H. Mëller: Selected Works in Genetics), Vavilov, N.I., Ed., Moscow: Sel’khozizdat, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Auerbach, Ch., Problemy mutageneza (Problems of Mutagenesis), Moscow: Mir, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Altukhov, Yu.P., Geneticheskie protsessy v populyatsiyakh (Genetic Processes in Populations), Moscow: Akademkniga, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chadov, B.F., Chadova, E.V., Kopyl, S.A., and Fedorova, N.B., A Novel Class of Mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk, 2000, vol. 373, no. 5, pp. 714–717.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chadov, B.F., Mutations Capable of Inducing Speciation, Evolyutsionnaya biologiya (Evolutionary Biology), Stegnii, V.N., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2001, vol. 1, pp. 138–162.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chadov, B.F., Chadova, E.V., Kopyl, S.A., and Fedorova, N.B., Delayed Activation of the Maternal Genome in Early Development of Drosophila, Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk, 2001, vol. 378, no. 6, pp. 841–845.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chadov, B.F., Chadova, E.V., Kopyl, S.A., et al., Genes Controlling Ontogeny: Morphoses, Phenocopies, Dimorphs, and Other Visible Manifestations of Mutant Genes, Rus. J. Genet., 2004, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 271–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Korochkin, L.I., Vvedenie v genetiku razvitiya (Introduction to Development Genetics), Moscow: Nauka, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Davidson, E.H., Rast, J.P., Oliveri, P., et al., A Genomic Regulatory Network for Development, Science, 2002, vol. 295, pp. 1669–1678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fedorova, N.B., Khotskina, E.A., Mitrenina, E.Yu., and Chadov, B.F., Chromosomal Rearrangements and Speciation: Explanation of Association between the Events, Evolyutsionnaya biologiya (Evolutionary Biology), Stegniy, V.N., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2005, vol. 3, pp. 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chadov, B.F., Chadova, E.V., Khotskina, N.B., and Fedorova, N.B., Mutation in Ontogenes—Genome Destabilization—Speciation, Evolyutsionnaya biologiya (Evolutionary Biology), Stegniy, V.N., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2005, pp. 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Khesin, R.B., Nepostoyanstvo Genoma (Genomic Instability), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vysotskii, D.L., Elementy biologicheskikh kontseptsii (Elements of the Biological Paradigm), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Golubovsky, M.D. and Churaev, R.N., Dynamic Heredity and Epigenes, Priroda, 1997, no. 4, pp. 16–25.

  39. Golubovsky, M.D., Noncanonical Hereditary Changes, Priroda, 2001, no. 9, pp. 3–8.

  40. Khossfeld, U., Yunker, T., Tsakhos, F., and Razran, L., Zoologist Adolf Rimane and His Views on Biological Evolution, Evolyutsionnaya biologii: istoriya i teoriya (Evolutionary Biology: History and Theory), issue 2, Kolchinskii, E.I. and Popov, I.Yu., Eds., St. Petersburg, 2003.

  41. Astaurov, B.L., The Results of My Research Work in Genetics, Istoriya biologicheskikh issledovanii (The History of Biological Studies), Moscow: Nauka, 1978, pp. 116–159.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Strunnikov, V.A. and Vyshinskii, I.M., Realization of Variability in Silk Worm, Problemy genetiki i teorii evolyutsii (Problems of Genetics and Evolution Theory), Novosibirsk: Nauka, pp. 99–114.

  43. Astaurov, B.L., Investigation of Hereditary Change in Halteres of Drosorhila melanogaster Shin, Zh. Eksper. Biol., Ser. A., 1927, vol. 3, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dragavtsev, V.A., K probleme geneticheskogo analiza poligennykh kolichestvennykh priznakov rastenii (Genetic Analysis of Polygenic Quantitative Traits in Plants), St. Petersburg: VIR, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dragavtsev, V.A., On the Gap between Plant Genetics and Plant Breeding and the Ways to Overcome It, Vestn. Saratovskogo Gosagrouniversiteta im.Vavilova, 2004, no. 1, pp. 10–15.

  46. Morgan, T.G., Razvitie i nasledstvennost’ (Development and Heredity), Leningrad: Biomedgiz, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Goldschmidt, R., Physiologische Theorie der Vererbung, Berlin: Springer, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mayr, E., Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Waddington, C.H., Organisers and Genes, 1940.

  50. Waddington, C.H., New Patterns in Genetics and Development, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Waddington, C.H., Towards a Theoretical Biology: Prolegomena, Birmingham: Aldine, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Churaev, R.N., A Hypothesis on Epigene, Issledovaniya po matematicheskoi genetike (Studies in Mathematical Genetics), Novosibirsk: Inst. Tsitol. Genet. SO RAN, 1975, pp. 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Churaev, R.N., Elementy nekanonicheskoi teorii nasledstvennosti (Elements of Noncanonical Heredity), Ufa: Ufimskii Nauchn. Tsentr, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Churaev, R.N., Stupak, I.V., Tropynina, T.S., and Stupak, E.E., Construction of a Two-Component Epigene with Preset Characteristics, Dokl. Ross. Acad. Nauk, 2001, vol. 378, no. 6, pp. 837–840.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Takhtadzhan, A., Principia tectologica. Printsipy organizatsii i transformatsii slozhnykh sistem: evolyutsionnyi podkhod (Principia tectologica. Principles of Organization and Transformation of Complex Systems: An Evolutionary Approach), St. Petersburg: SPKhFA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chadov, B.F., Facultative Dominant Lethals: Genetics, Ontogeny, and Phylogeny, Evolyutsionnaya biologiya (Evolutionary Biology), Stegnii, V.N., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2002, vol. 2, pp. 118–142.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chadov, B.F., Species Transformation and Speciation: Two Forms of Evolutionary Transformation of Living Organisms, Evolyutsiya zhizni na Zemle (Evolution of Life on the Earth), Podobina, V.M., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2005, vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I., Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Haken, H., Synergetics, Heidelberg: Springer, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © B.F. Chadov, 2006, published in Genetika, 2006, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1261–1275.

The terminology and statements made by the author in this article are of a debatable character.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chadov, B.F. A new stage in the development of genetics and term epigenetics . Russ J Genet 42, 1053–1065 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795406090110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795406090110

Keywords

Navigation