Skip to main content
Log in

Bicomponent Nuclear Power

  • Scientific Session of the General Meeting of RAS Members “75 Years of the Nuclear Industry: the Contribution of the Academy of Sciences”
  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prospects and problems of the development of modern nuclear power, as well as ways to solve them are analyzed in this article, which was prepared on the basis of a report at the General Meeting of RAS members on December 8, 2020. In late 2018, the Presidium of Rosatom’s Scientific and Technical Council approved the Strategy for the Development of Nuclear Power, which envisages reaching an NPP capacity in the range of 70–90 GW by the end of the century. The strategy assumes that by the middle of the century, nuclear power will become bicomponent: along with the technologies of the existing nuclear power, which currently uses an open nuclear fuel cycle and thermal neutron reactors, a new branch of nuclear power will be created on the basis of fast reactors with a closed nuclear fuel cycle. Its development will make it possible to reduce the accumulation of spent nuclear fuel, reduce the volume of radioactive waste, increase the efficiency of the use of uranium raw materials and environmental indicators, and maintain the competitiveness of nuclear energy in comparison with other generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy) is the average estimated cost of electricity generation over the entire life cycle of a power plant, including all possible investments, costs, and revenues.

REFERENCES

  1. E. O. Adamov, “Proryv project—technological basement for large-scale nuclear energy,” in International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Next Generation Nuclear Systems for Sustainable Development (FR17): Book of Abstracts, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, June 26–29, 2017 (State Atomic Energy Agency Corporation Rosatom, Ekaterinburg, 2017), p. 281. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/48/087/48087759.pdf#%5B%7B%22num%22%3A326%2C%22gen%22%3A0%7D%2C%7B%22name%22%3A%22XYZ%22%7D%2C31%2C565%2C0%5D.

  2. E. O. Adamov, V. I. Rachkov, D. A. Tolstoukhov, and S. A. Panov, “Comparing technical and economic parameters of various NFC options for nuclear power plants,” Izv. Ross. Acad. Nauk. Energ., No. 4, 25–36 (2016).

  3. Nuclear Power White Book: Closed NFC with Fast Reactors, Ed. by E. O. Adamov (Izd. GUP NIKIET, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. O. Adamov, L. M. Zabud’ko, V. I. Matveev, et al., “Comparative study of advantages and disadvantages of the use of metal and mixed nitride uranium–plutonium fuel in fast reactors,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ., No. 2, 3–15 (2015).

  5. E. O. Adamov, G. N. Vlaskin, A. V. Lopatkin, et al., “Radiation-equivalent treatment of radioactive nuclides in nuclear fuel cycle as an effective alternative to the delayed solution of the spent nuclear fuel accumulation problem,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ., No. 6, 15–25 (2015).

  6. E. O. Adamov, A. A. Kashirskii, E. V. Murav’ev, and D. A. Tolstoukhov, “Two-component nuclear power structure and characteristics in closed nuclear fuel cycle transition scenarios,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ., No. 5, 14–32 (2016).

  7. R. V. Arytyunyan, L. A. Bol’shov, E. M. Melikhova, and S. V. Panchenko, “Lessons of Chernobyl and Fukushima: Topical problems of improving the system of protection of the population and territories in case of accidents at nuclear power plants,” Med. Radiol. Radiats. Bezop. 61 (3), 36–51 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. K. Ivanov, S. Yu. Chekin, E. O. Adamov, et al., New Generation Nuclear Power: Radiological Consistency and Environmental Benefits, Ed. by V. K. Ivanov and E. O. Adamov (Pero, Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. O. Adamov, A. V. Lopatkin, E. V. Murav’ev, et al., “National strategy for the development of nuclear power: Two approaches to a new technology platform for nuclear power,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energ., No. 1, 3–14 (2019).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. O. Adamov, V. G. Asmolov, L. A. Bol’shov or V. K. Ivanov.

Additional information

Translated by B. Alekseev

Evgenii Olegovich Adamov, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), is a Professor and Scientific Supervisor of the “Proryv” Project of the Rosatom State Corporation (Rosatom) and JSC “Dollezhal’ Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering” (JSC NIKIET). Vladimir Grigor’evich Asmolov, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), is a Professor and Advisor to Rosatom’s Director General. RAS Academician Leonid Aleksandrovich Bol’shov is Scientific Director of the RAS Nuclear Safety Institute (IBRAE RAS). RAS Corresponding Member Viktor Konstantinovich Ivanov is Chief Radioecologist of Rosatom’s Proryv Project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adamov, E.O., Asmolov, V.G., Bol’shov, L.A. et al. Bicomponent Nuclear Power. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 91, 265–273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331621030011

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331621030011

Keywords:

Navigation