Skip to main content
Log in

Science As a Cultural Phenomenon and a Sociocultural Project

  • Point of View
  • Published:
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two ways of considering science—as a cultural phenomenon and as a sociocultural project—are analyzed through the prism of the sociophilosophical program of science development that was proposed by A.A. Bogdanov, a thinker and public figure. The premises of Bogdanov’s approach to the analysis of the stage of science development in his lifetime are revealed, making it possible to highlight the character of the ideological and sociocultural situation at the turn of the 20th century. At that time, the positivistic mindset and the recognition of science as a decisive element of cultural and historical integrity, formed by the European intellectual tradition, including to a significant extent the Russian one, coincided with the rise of the ideology of social reconstruction. It is shown that Bogdanov developed an original interpretation of Marxism with the involvement of the ideas of so-called second positivism, which included problems of the development of science and technology in the context of the historical development of human society. On the one hand, this made it possible to go beyond the internalist consideration of science (the view from the inside) and, on the other, to pose the question about science as a phenomenon not simply forming spontaneously but also accessible for conscious organizing activity, i.e., for control. In Bogdanov’s project, this control included not only scientific policy but also a broader one, which can be defined as sociocultural projecting, putting the scientist’s ideas on a par with various programs of substantiating science as a cultural value and social institution, characteristic of the formation and development of the modern European scientific tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. F. Kh. Kessidi, Ideas and People: Historicophilosophical and Sociopolitical Essays (Inst. Filos. Russ. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Western Philosophy of the 20th–Early 21st Centuries: Intellectual Biographies (Tsentr Gumanitarnykh Initsiativ, St. Petersburg, 2016) [in Russian].

  3. N. N. Moiseev, People and Cybernetics (Molodaya Gvardiya, Moscow, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Lektorskii, Philosophy, Cognition, Culture (Kanon+, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. E. Arkhangel’skii and I. I. Gorlova, “The essential characteristic of totalitarianism and totalitarian culture in the context of culturological knowledge,” Teor. Prak. Obshchestv. Razv., No. 4, 77–78 (2010).

  6. S. V. Pirozhkova, “Soviet Marxism and identity of contemporary Russian philosophy,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 88 (6), 539–548 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Steila, Scienza e revoluzione: La recezione dell’empiriocriticismo nella cultura russa (1877–1910) (Casa Editrice Le Lettere, Florence, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. M. Mezhuev, Marx vs. Marxism: Articles on Unpopular Topics (Kul’turnaya Revolyutsiya, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. V. Loktionov, Alexander Bogdanov between Marxism and Positivism (Inst. Filos. Russ. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. V. Loktionov, Alexander Bogdanov: An Unknown Marxism (GAUGN-Press, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Constructivist Approach to Epistemology and Human Sciences, Ed. by V. A. Lektorskii (Kanon+, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Psychology and Postmodernism, Ed. by S. Kvale (Thousand Oaks, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Gergen, An Invitation to Social Construction (Thousand Oaks, London, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Borup, N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. van Lente, “The sociology of expectations in science and technology,” Technol. Anal. Strategic Management 18 (3/4), 285–298 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. C. van Fraassen, The Scientific Image (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. A. A. Bogdanov, Tektology (Universal Organizational Science), in 2 vols. (Ekonomika, Moscow, 1989), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

  17. E. O. Trufanova, Subject and Cognition in the World of Social Constructions (Kanon+, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. D. Gloveli and N. K. Figurovskaya, “The tragedy of collectivism,” in A. A. Bogdanov, Problems of Socialism: Works of Different Years (Politizdat, Moscow, 1990), pp. 3–28 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Rockmore, “Is Marx a materialist?,” Epistemol. Philos. Sci. 55 (3), 62–75 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. A. Bogdanov, Faith and science. http://psylib.org.ua/books/lenin01/txt14.htm. Cited November 10, 2018.

  21. S. V. Pirozhkova and V. V. Omelaenko, “Historical context and contemporary significance of Alexander Bogdanov’s social projects,” Istoriya 10 (12) (2019). https://history.jes.su/S207987840005338-0-1/?sl=en. Cited February 18, 2020.

  22. A. A. Bogdanov, Problems of Socialism: Works of Different Years (Politizdat, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. A. Bogdanov, “Socialism of science,” in A. A. Bogdanov, Problems of Socialism: Works of Different Years (Politizdat, Moscow, 1990), pp. 360–410 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. V. Pirozhkova, “Humanistic support for technological development: What should it be like?” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 88 (3), 210–219 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O. E. Stolyarova, “The third wave of science studies as a philosophical justification for STS,” Logos 24, 31–52.

  26. A. Jamison, S. H. Christensen, and L. Botin, Hybrid Imagination: Science and Technology in Cultural Perspective (Morgan & Claypool, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. G. Gorokhov and A. Grunwald, “Each innovation has a social character (Social assessment of technology as an applied philosophy of technology),” Vyssh. Obr. Ross., No. 5, 135–145 (2011).

  28. L. M. Kosareva, The Birth of Modern Science from the Spirit of Culture (Inst. Psikhol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. I. Vavilov, “The scientific genius of Stalin,” in The USSR Academy of Sciences to Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin (Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1949) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. V. A. Lektorskii, “Inevitability of ideology (Ideology, science, philosophy),” in Philosophy and Ideology: From Marx to Postmodernism, Ed. by A. A. Guseinov and A. V. Rubtsov (Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian], pp. 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. L. Chertkova, “Utopia as a ‘philosophical project,’” Vopr. Filos., No. 5, 190–201 (2015).

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 19-78-00134.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Pirozhkova.

Additional information

Translated by B. Alekseev

Sophia Vladislavovna Pirozhkova, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), is a Senior Research Fellow of the RAS Institute of Philosophy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirozhkova, S.V. Science As a Cultural Phenomenon and a Sociocultural Project. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 90, 324–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620030053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620030053

Keywords:

Navigation