Abstract
Two books recently published abroad by prominent historians of biology on Lysenkoism acknowledging the revival of interest in this phenomenon among the international scientific community are considered. The first book in two volumes, The Lysenko Controversy As a Global Phenomenon, edited by W. deJong-Lambert and N.L. Krementsov, combines modernized old and new approaches to the study and understanding of Lysenkoism. The author shows the merits of the two volumes, demonstrating the progress reached in recent years in works on this topic, and focuses on several drawbacks of the edition. The other book analyzed is L. Graham’s, Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia. In this book T.D. Lysenko’s activities and their consequences for scientific culture in general and for contemporary Russian science in particular as well as some problems of Lysenkoism in the country’s current political context are considered. In the opinion of the reviewer, the polemical character of the book gives a serious reason for reflections on the fate of not only Russian science but also of the country.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Hoxtermann, “‘Klassenbiologen’ und ‘Formalgenetiker.’ Zur Rezeption Lyssenkos unter den Biologen in der DDR,” Acta Historica Leopoldina 36, 273–300 (2000).
W. deJong-Lambert, “From eugenics to Lysenkoism: The evolution of Stanislaw Skowron,” Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 39, 269–299 (2009).
R. Hagemann, “How did East German genetics avoid Lysenkoism?,” Trends Genet. 18, 320–24 (2002).
O. C. D. Harman, “Darlington and the British and American reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet conception of science,” J. Hist. Biol. 36, 309–352 (2003).
K. Iida, “Practice and politics in Japanese science: Hitoshi Kihara and the formation of a genetics discipline,” J. Hist. Biol. 43, 529–570 (2010).
A. V. Kupriyanov, “Soviet creative Darwinism (1930-1950): From the selective reading of Darwin’s works to the transmutation of species,” Ist.-Biol. Issled. 3 (2), 8–31 (2011).
E. Schandevyl, “Soviet biology. Scientific ethos and political engagement: Belgian university professors and the Lysenko case,” J. Comm. Stud. Transition Politics 19 (2), 93–107 (2003).
A. J. Wolfe, “What does it mean to go public? The American response to Lysenkoism, reconsidered,” Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 40 (1), 48–78 (2010).
M. B. Konashev, “Soviet evolutionary biology and Th. Dobzhansky’s critics of Lysenkoism,” in Book of Abstracts. 7th International Conference of the European Society for the History of Science. Prague, Czech Republic. September 22–24, 2016, Ed. by K. Chemla, P. Svobodny, M. Sekyrkova, and R. Vojtěch (Prague, 2016), pp. 118–119.
W. deJong-Lambert, “Histories of Lysenkoism continued: A.E. Stepushin and why is there no English translation for ‘Lysenkovschina?,’” in Book of Abstracts. 7th International Conference of the European Society for the History of Science. Prague, Czech Republic. September 22–24, 2016, Ed. by K. Chemla, P. Svobodny, M. Sekyrkova, and R. Vojtěch (Prague, 2016), p. 119.
T. Hermann and M. Stella, “Bad guys turned to good guys: Milan Hašek. VJA Novak and others on the way from Lysenkoism to mainstream science in Czechoslovakia, 1950–1980,” in Book of Abstracts. 7th International Conference of the European Society for the History of Science. Prague, Czech Republic. September 22–24, 2016, Ed. by K. Chemla, P. Svobodny, M. Sekyrkova, and R. Vojtěch (Prague, 2016), pp. 119–120.
The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon: Genetics and Agriculture in the Soviet Union and Beyond, Ed. by W. deJong-Lambert and N. L. Krementsov, in 2 vols. (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2017).
N. L. Krementsov, “Lysenkoism in Europe: Export- Import of the Soviet Model,” in Academia in Upheaval: Origins, Transfers, and Transformations of the Communist Academic Regime in Russia and East Central Europe, Ed. by M. David-Fox and G. Peteri (Garland Publishing Group, New York, 2000).
W. deJong-Lambert and N. L. Krementsov, “The Lysenko controversy and the Cold War,” J. Hist. Biol. 45 (3), 373–388 (2012).
N. L. Krementsov and W. deJong-Lambert, “‘Lysenkoism’ Redux: Introduction,” in The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon: Genetics and Agriculture in the Soviet Union and Beyond, Ed. by W. deJong-Lambert and N.L. Krementsov, Vol. 1 (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2017).
O. Yu. Elina, “Lysenko’s predecessors: The Demchinsky’s and the bed cultivation of cereal crops,” in The Lysenko Controversy As a Global Phenomenon: Genetics and Agriculture in the Soviet Union and Beyond, Ed. by W. deJong-Lambert and N. L. Krementsov, Vol. 1 (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2017).
L. Graham, Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2016).
Yu. F. Bogdanov, “To Barbara McClintock’s 90th birthday,” Genetika 28 (6), 185–189 (1992).
A. Robertson, “Conrad Hal Waddington, 8 November 1905–26 September 1975,” Biogr. Mem. Fellows R. Soc. 23, 575–622 (1977).
H. Balzer, “Loren Graham, Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016. 209 pp. $24.95,” J. Cold War Stud. 19(2), 220–222 (2017).
J. Oldfield, “Loren Graham. Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia. 209 pp., illus., bibl., index. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press, 2016. $24.95,” ISIS 108 (1), 224–225 (2017).
O. Hill-Andrews, “Loren Graham, Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016. Pp. 200. ISBN 978-0-674-08905-1. £18.95 (hardback),” Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 49 (3), 511–512 (2016).
E. I. Kolchinsky, “Current attempts at exonerating ‘Lysenkoism’ and their causes,” in The Lysenko Controversy As a Global Phenomenon: Genetics and Agriculture in the Soviet Union and Beyond, Ed. by W. deJong-Lambert and N. L. Krementsov, Vol. 2 (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2017).
W. deJong-Lambert, “Loren Graham, Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia,” J. Mod. Hist. 90 (1), 242–243 (2018).
R. Legvold, Lysenko’s Ghost: Epigenetics and Russia. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsulereview/2016-08-11/lysenkos-ghost-epigenetics-andrussia. Cited April 25, 2018.
L. Graham, Moscow Stories (pmIndiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, 2006).
L. Graham, Lonely Ideas: Can Russia Compete? (MIT Press, Cambringe, Mass., 2013).
L. P. Graham, “Lysenko up close,” Ist.-Biol. Issled. 10 (1), 42–51 (2018).
M. B. Konashev, “The Theodosius passion, or How and why F.G. Dobrzhanskii became a defector,” Vestn. VOGiS, No. 1, 202–209 (2013).
V. I. Ivanov, Yu. F. Bogdanov, and N. A. Lyapunova, “The life and creative career of N.V. Timofeev- Resovskii,” in N. V. Timofeev-Resovskii, Selected Works, Ed. by O. G. Gazenko and V. I. Ivanov (Nauka, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].
I. A. Zakharov, Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and Pages of the History of Soviet Genetics (IOGen RAN, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Mikhail Borisovich Konashev, Dr. Sci. (Filos.) and Cand. Sci. (Biol.), is Chief Researcher of the St. Petersburg Branch of the Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, RAS.
Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2019, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 637–645.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Konashev, M.B. Lysenko Up Close but Afar, or Focus on Lysenkoism from the 21st Century. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 89, 303–309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331619030055
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331619030055