Abstract
The authors of this article respond to V.A. Nekhamkin’s call to answer the counterfactual challenge of the past related to the question of surrendering Leningrad in the course of the Great Patriotic War. Refuting numerous pseudoscientific investigations of revisionists of the history of that war, the authors show the misanthropic essence of the Third Reich’s plans with respect to the Soviet Union in general and Leningrad in particular and, using the logic of alternative history, analyze, first, possible actions of the military–political leadership of Nazi Germany in a situation similar to the blockade of Leningrad and, second, possible military consequences of the loss of the city on the Neva River. From the point of view of military science and humanitarian considerations, it is proved that the actions of the Soviet command in defending Leningrad were not only right but also that no alternative existed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. A. Zolotarev and E. Kul’kov, “Generalplan Ost,” Mezhdunar. Probl. Vneshnei Politiki, Diplomatii, Nats. Bezopasnosti, No. 6, 82–102 (2011).
The Great Patriotic War 1941–1945, in 12 vols., Vol. 1: The Main Events of the War (Voenizdat, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].
C. Madajczyk, “Is there synchrony between the Generalplan Ost and 'the final solution to the Jewish question'?,” in Der Zweite Weltkrieg—Analysen, Grundzüge, Forschungsbilanz, Ed. by W. Michalka (Piper, Munich, 1989; Progress-Akademiya, Moscow, 1996).
Politico-Strategic Content of the Third-Reich’s Plans Concerning the USSR: A Collection of Documents and Materials, Ed. by V. A. Zolotarev (Kuchkovo Pole, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].
H. Picker, Hitlers Tischgespräche in Fϋhrwrhauptquartier 1941–1942 (Athenäum, Bonn, 1951; Rusich, Smolensk, 1998); Hitler’s Table Talk: His Private Conversations: 1941–1944. Introduced and with a New Preface by Hugh Trevor-Roper (Enigma Books, New York, 2000).
F. Halder, Kriegstagebuch. Tägliche Aufzeichnungen des Chefs des Generalstabes des Heeres 1939–1942, in 3 vols. (W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1962–1964; Voenizdat, Moscow, 1971).
M. Vogt, “Revelations in anticipation of victory,” The Second World War (Nauka, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].
The Nuremberg Trial: A Collection of Materials, in 8 vols. (Yuridicheskaya Literatura, Moscow, 1988), Vol. 2 [in Russian].
Deutschland im Zweiten Weltkrieg, Ed. by E. Laboor (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1975), Vol. 2.
H. Guderian, Recollections of a German General: The German Panzers in the Second World War (Tsentrpoligraf, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].
K. Zeitzler, “The battle of Stalingrad,” in The Wehrmacht’s Fatal Decisions (Rusich, Moscow, 2000), pp. 212–225 [in Russian].
I. S. Konev, Nineteen Forty-Five (Voenizdat, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].
K. K. Rokossovskii, The Soldier’s Duty (Voenizdat, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].
I. S. Konev, Notes of a Front Commander (Boenizdat, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].
G. K. Zhukov, Recollections and Reflections (Yauza, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].
A. V. Isaev, “Mousetraps of 1941”: The History of the Great Patriotic War That We did not Know (Yauza, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.A. Zolotarev, F.O. Trunov, 2017, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2017, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 257–262.
Vladimir Antonovich Zolotarev, Dr. Sci. (Hist. and Law), is Class 1 Active State Advisor of the Russian Federation. Filipp Olegovich Trunov, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), is a Lecturer in the Department of International Security of the Faculty of World Politics at Moscow State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zolotarev, V.A., Trunov, F.O. The military–strategic and humanitarian significance of the defense of Leningrad. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 87, 199–204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331617020071
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331617020071