Abstract
The existence of weak solutions of the initial-boundary value problem for the equations of motion of a viscoelastic fluid with memory along trajectories of a nonsmooth velocity field and with an inhomogeneous boundary condition is proved. The study relies on Galerkin-type approximations of the original problem followed by passage to the limit based on a priori estimates. The theory of regular Lagrangian flows is used to examine the behavior of trajectories of a nonsmooth velocity field.
REFERENCES
A. P. Oskolkov, “Initial-boundary value problems for equations of motion of Kelvin–Voigt fluids and Oldroyd fluids,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 179, 137–182 (1989).
V. G. Zvyagin and V. P. Orlov, “On the weak solvability of the problem of viscoelasticity with memory,” Differ. Equations 53 (2), 212–217 (2017).
V. G. Zvyagin and V. P. Orlov, “Solvability of one non-Newtonian fluid dynamics model with memory,” Nonlinear Anal.: Theory Methods Appl. 172, 73–98 (2018).
V. G. Zvyagin and V. P. Orlov, “On one problem of viscoelastic fluid dynamics with memory on an infinite time interval,” Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst., Ser. B 23 (9), 3855–3877 (2018).
V. P. Orlov, “A non-homogeneous regularized problem of dynamics of viscoelastic continuous medium,” Russ. Math. 56, 48–53 (2012).
A. V. Zvyagin, V. G. Zvyagin, and D. M. Polyakov, “Dissipative solvability of an alpha model of fluid flow with memory,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 59 (7), 1185–1198 (2019).
V. G. Zvyagin and V. P. Orlov, “On regularity of weak solutions to a generalized Voigt model of viscoelasticity,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 60 (11), 1872–1888 (2020).
V. G. Zvyagin and V. P. Orlov, “On a model of thermoviscoelasticity of Jeffreys–Oldroyd type,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 56 (10), 1803–1812 (2016).
V. G. Zvyagin and D. A. Vorotnikov, Topological Approximation Methods for Evolutionary Problems of Nonlinear Hydrodynamics (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2008).
I. I. Vorovich and V. I. Yudovich, “Steady flows of a viscous incompressible fluid,” Mat. Sb. 53 (4), 393–428 (1961).
O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969).
M. V. Korobkov, K. Pileckas, V. V. Pukhnachov, and R. Russo, “The flux problem for the Navier–Stokes equations,” Russ. Math. Surv. 69 (6), 1065–1122 (2014).
R. Temam, Navier–Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).
Functional Analysis, Ed. by S. G. Krein (Nauka, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].
R. J. DiPerna and P. L. Lions, “Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces,” Invent. Math. 98, 511–547 (1989).
G. Crippa and C. de Lellis, “Estimates and regularity results for the diPerna–Lions flow,” J. Reine Angew. Math. 616, 15–46 (2008).
Yu. N. Bibikov, A Course in Ordinary Differential Equations (Leningrad. Gos. Univ., Leningrad, 1981) [in Russian].
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-11-00103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by I. Ruzanova
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Below are the above-used facts from the theory of RLFs. In a bounded domain \({{\Omega }_{0}}\) with a smooth boundary \(\partial {{\Omega }_{0}}\), consider the Cauchy problem
Definition 6.1. Suppose that \(u \in {{L}_{1}}(0,T;\mathop W\limits^ \circ {\kern 1pt} _{p}^{1}{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}^{N}})\), \(1 \leqslant p \leqslant + \infty \), \({\text{div}}{\kern 1pt} u(t,x) = 0\), and \(u{\kern 1pt} {{{\text{|}}}_{{[0,T] \times \partial {{\Omega }_{0}}}}} = 0\). The regular Lagrangian flow (RLF) associated with \(u\) is defined as a function \(z(\tau ;t,x)\), \((\tau ;t,x) \in [0,T] \times [0,T] \times {{\overline \Omega }_{0}}\), satisfying the following conditions:
(1) For a.e. x and any \(t \in [0,T]\), the function \(z(\tau ;t,x)\) is absolutely continuous and satisfies Eq. (6.1).
(2) For any \(t,\tau \in [0,T]\) and an arbitrary Lebesgue measurable set B with measure m(B), it is true that \(m(z(\tau ;t,B)) = m(B).\)
(3) For all \({{t}_{i}}, \in [0,T],\) \(i = 1,2,3\), and a.e. \(x \in \overline \Omega \), \(z({{t}_{3}};{{t}_{1}},x) = z({{t}_{3}};{{t}_{2}},z({{t}_{2}};{{t}_{1}},x))\).
The following results hold (see, e.g., [15, 16]).
Theorem 6.1. Assume that \(u \in {{L}_{1}}(0,T;\mathop W\limits^ \circ {\kern 1pt} _{p}^{1}{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}^{N}})\), \(1 \leqslant p \leqslant + \infty \), \({\text{div}}{\kern 1pt} u(t,x) = 0\) and \(u{\kern 1pt} {{{\text{|}}}_{{[0,T] \times \partial \Omega }}} = 0\). Then there exists a unique RLF \(z\) associated with \({v}\). Moreover, \(\partial z(\tau ;t,x){\text{/}}\partial \tau \) = \(u(\tau ,z(\tau ;t,x))\) for \(t \in [0,T],\) a.e. \(\tau \in [0,T],\) and a.e. \(x \in {{\Omega }_{0}}\).
Theorem 6.2. Suppose that \(v\), \({{v}^{m}} \in {{L}_{1}}(0,T;\mathop W\limits^ \circ {\kern 1pt} _{1}^{p}{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}^{N}})\), \(m = 1,2, \ldots \) for some \(p > 1\). Assume that \({\text{div}}{\kern 1pt} v = 0\), \({\text{div}}{\kern 1pt} {{v}^{m}} = 0\), \({{v}^{m}}{\kern 1pt} {{{\text{|}}}_{{[0,T] \times \partial {{\Omega }_{0}}}}} = 0\), and \(v{\kern 1pt} {{{\text{|}}}_{{[0,T] \times \partial \Omega }}} = 0\). Additionally, assume that
\({\text{||}}{{v}_{x}}{\text{|}}{{{\text{|}}}_{{{{L}_{1}}(0,T;{{L}_{p}}{{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}}^{{N \times N}}})}}} + \;{\text{||}}v{\text{|}}{{{\text{|}}}_{{{{L}_{1}}(0,T;{{L}_{1}}{{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}}^{N}})}}} \leqslant M,\quad {\text{||}}v_{x}^{m}{\text{|}}{{{\text{|}}}_{{{{L}_{1}}(0,T;{{L}_{p}}{{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}}^{{N \times N}}})}}} + \;{\text{||}}{{{v}}^{m}}{\text{|}}{{{\text{|}}}_{{{{L}_{1}}(0,T;{{L}_{1}}{{{({{\Omega }_{0}})}}^{N}})}}} \leqslant M.\)
Suppose that \({{v}^{m}}\) converges to \(v\) in \({{L}_{1}}{{([0,T] \times {{\Omega }_{0}})}^{N}}\) as \(m \to + \infty \). Let \({{z}^{m}}(\tau ;t,x)\) and \(z(\tau ;t,x)\) be the RLFs associated with \({{v}^{m}}\) and \(v\), respectively. Then the sequence zm converges (up to a subsequence) to z with respect to the Lebesgue measure on the set \([0,T] \times {{\Omega }_{0}}\) uniformly in \(t \in [0,T]\).
Note that, in the case of a smooth \(u(t,x)\), the RLF associated with \(u(t,x)\) gives a classical solution \(z(\tau ;t,x)\) of the Cauchy problem.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zvyagin, V.G., Orlov, V.P. On Weak Solvability of a Flow Problem for Viscoelastic Fluid with Memory. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 63, 2090–2106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542523110209
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542523110209