Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Ex-Post and Ex-Ante Integrated Assessment Frameworks in Conceptualization of the Modeling Process in the Context of Integrated Water Resources Management

  • WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT: ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ASPECTS
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconnaissance and conceptualization of the system are the first steps to perform an integrated assessment study and step towards sustainability. This paper focuses on the conceptualization phase of the integrated assessment using frameworks to identify the key variables of a system and their relations. Authors believe that in an integrated assessment study, it is important to include both “ex-post” and “ex-ante” aspects. This paper adopts Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) as an ex-post, and Goal Oriented Framework (GOF) as an ex-ante framework to the model conceptualization process in the case of water resources system in South Khorasan, Iran. It is shown that DPSIR framework is well adapted to describe past and present interactions of the system and provide a retrospective view, also more focused on the environmental dimension, while GOF is able to capture the future interactions as well and it can also encompass the three dimensions of sustainability. By adopting both frameworks, a more integrated and comprehensive view of the system has been achieved, which can be helpful to shed lights on knowing the key variables and relations to be relied on in the phase of developing efficient models to analyze the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Agricultural Jihad Organization of South Khorasan Province, Statistics report, 2010.

  2. Agyemang, I., McDonald, A., and Carver, S., Application of the DPSIR framework to environmental degradation assessment in northern Ghana, Nat. Resour. Forum, 2007, vol. 31, pp. 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agyenim, J.B. and Gupta, J., IWRM and developing countries: Implementation challenges in Ghana, Phys. Chem. Earth, 2012, vol. 47, pp. 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alkan Olsson, J., Bockstaller, C., Stapleton, L.M., Ewert, F., Knapen, R., Therond, O., Geniaux, G., Bellon, S., Correira, T., Turpin, N., and Bezlepkina, I., A goal oriented indicator framework to support integrated assessment of new policies for agri-environmental systems, Environ. Sci. Policy, 2009, vol. 12, pp. 562–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alkan Olsson, J., Bockstaller, C., Turpin, N., Therond, O., and Bezlepkina, I., Indicator framework, indicators, and up-scaling methods implemented in the final version of SEAMLESS-IF, D2.1.3, SEAMLESS integrated project, EU 6th Framework Programme, Contract no. 010036-2, 2009.

  6. Atkins, J.P., Burdon, D., Elliott, M., and Gregory, A.J., Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2011, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bär, R., Rouholahnejad, E., Rahman, K., Abbaspour, K.C., and Lehmann, A., Climate change and agricultural water resources: A vulnerability assessment of the Black Sea catchment, Environ. Sci. Policy, 2015, vol. 46, pp. 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bagheri, A., Darijani, M., Asgary, A., and Morid, S., Crisis in urban water systems during the reconstruction period: a system dynamics analysis of alternative policies after the 2003 earthquake in Bam—Iran, Water Resour. Manage., 2010, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2567–2596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Makowski, D., Aveline, A., Girardin, P., and Plantureux, S., Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems, A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2008, vol. 28, pp. 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuilin, L., Optimization Model for Geoheritage Landscape Resources Management Based on Benefit-Sharing in Xinjiang, Energy Procedia, 2011, vol. 5, pp. 1060–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies, E.G.R. and Simonovic, S.P., Global water resources modeling with an integrated model of the social–economic–environmental system, Adv. Water Resour., 2011, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 684–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Geniaux, G., Bellon, S., Deverre, C., and Powell, B., PD 2.2.1 sustainable development indicator frameworks and initiatives, SEAMLESS integrated project, EU 6th Framework Programme, Contract no. 010036-2, 2005.

  13. Giupponi, C., Jakeman, A.J., Karssenberg, D., and Hare, M.P., Sustainable Management of Water Resources an Integrated Approach, UK, Northempton: Edward Elgar publishing, 2006.

  14. Giupponi, C., Mysiak, J., Fassio, A., and Cogan, V., MULINO-DSS: a computer tool for sustainable use of water resources at the catchment scale, Mathematics and Computer in Simulation, 2004, vol. 64, pp. 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gudmundsson, H., The policy use of environmental indicators-learning from evaluation research, J. Transdisciplinary Environ. Studies, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hermanowicz, W.S., Sustainability in water resources management: changes in meaning and perception, Sustain. Sci., 2008, vol. 3, pp. 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IISD, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Workshop Rep., 1999.

  18. IWRMC, Iran Water Resources Management Company, Statistical Rep., 2012.

  19. Jia, Y., Niu, C., and Wang, H., Integrated modeling and assessment of water resources and water environment in the Yellow River Basin, J. Hydro-Environ. Res., 2007, vol. 1, pp. 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kristensen, P., The DPSIR framework, Workshop on a comprehensive/detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach, UNEP Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya, 2004.

  21. Letcher, R.A., Croke, B.F.W., Jakeman, A.J., and Merritt, W.S., An integrated modelling toolbox for water resources assessment and management in highland catchments: Model description, Agric. Syst., 2006, vol. 89, pp. 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madani, K. and Mariño, M.A., System dynamics analysis for managing Iran’s Zayandeh-Rud river basin, Water Resour. Manage., 2009, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2163–2187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maxim, L., Spangenbergm, J.H., and O’Connor, M., An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework, Ecol. Economics, 2009, vol. 69, pp. 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niemeijer, N. and Groot, R.S., A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets, Eco. indicators, 2008a, vol. 8, pp. 14–25.

  25. Niemeijer, N. and Groot, R.S., Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2008b, vol. 10, pp. 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews: A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment. OECD Environment Monographs, Paris, France, 1993, vol. 179, 39 p.

  27. Panagopoulos, Y., Gassman, P.W., Jha, M.K., Kling, C.L., Campbell, T., Srinivasan, R., White, M., and Arnold, J.G., A refined regional modeling approach for the Corn Belt—Experiences and recommendations for large-scale integrated modeling, J. Hydrol., 2015, vol. 524, pp. 348–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Potschin, M., Land use and the state of the natural environment, Land Use Policy, 2009, vol. 26, pp. 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prodanovic, P. and Simonovic, S.P., An operational model for support of integrated watershed management, Water Resour. Manage., 2010, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1161–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rotmans, J. and Van Asselt, M., Integrated assessment: growing child on its way to maturity. An editorial essay, Clim. Change, 1996, vol. 34, pp. 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Safavi, H.R., Golmohammadi, M.H., and Sandoval-Solis, S., Expert knowledge based modeling for integrated water resources planning and management in the Zayandehrud River Basin, J. Hydrol., 2015, vol. 528, pp. 773–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Samareh Hashemi, M., Zare, F., and Bagheri, A., A systemic analysis of the flood threat in Gorganrood Basin, Iran using a DPSIR framework, 5th Int. Perspective on Water Resour. Environ., Marrakech, Morocco, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Simonovic, S.P. and Rajasekaram, V., Integrated Analyses of Canada’s Water Resources: A System Dynamics Approach, Canadian Water Resour. J., 2004, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smeets, E. and Weterings, R., Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Techn. Rep. No. 25, Copenhagen: Eur. Environ. Agency, 1999.

  35. South Khorasan regional water company, Stochastic Database, 2012.

  36. United Nations, World Water Development Rep. 1. Water for people water for life, UNESCO, 2003.

  37. United Nations, World Water Development Rep. 2. Water a shared responsibility, UNESCO, 2006.

  38. United Nations, Our waters: joining hands across borders, Economic Commission For Europe, Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, 2007.

  39. United Nations, World Water Development Rep. 3. Water in a changing world, UNESCO, 2009.

  40. United Nations, World Water Development Rep. 4. Managing water under uncertainty and risk, UNESCO, 2012.

  41. United Nations, World Water Development Rep. 5. Water for a sustainable world, UNESCO, 2015.

  42. Valkering, P., Toddling long the River Meuse, Integrated Assessment and participatory Agent-Based Modelling to support River Management, PhD Thesis, Maastricht Univ., 2009, 255 p.

  43. Van Ittersum, M.K., Ewert, F., Heckelei, T., Wery, J., Alkan Olsson, J., Andersen, E., Bezlepkina, I., Brouwer, F., Donatelli, M., Flichman, G., Olsson, L., Rizzoli, A.E., Van der Wal, T., Wien, J.E., and Wolf, J., Integrated assessment of agricultural systems, a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS), Agric. Systems, 2008, vol. 96, pp. 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vázquez, J.F. and Mattei, F.E.E., A Methodology for Policy Analysis in Water Resources Management, EAERE FEEM VIU European Summer School, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Walmsley, J.J. and Consultants, M., Framework for Measuring Sustainable Development in Catchment Systems, Environ. Manage., 2002, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. White, J.W., Hunt, L.A., Boote, K.J., Jones, J.W., Koo, J., Kim, S., Porter, C.H., Wilkens, P.W., and Hoogenboom, G., Integrated description of agricultural field experiments and production: The ICASA Version 2.0 data standards, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2013, vol. 96, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marzieh Samareh Hashemi, Ali Bagheri or Andrea Emilio Rizzoli.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marzieh Samareh Hashemi, Bagheri, A. & Rizzoli, A.E. The Role of Ex-Post and Ex-Ante Integrated Assessment Frameworks in Conceptualization of the Modeling Process in the Context of Integrated Water Resources Management. Water Resour 46, 296–307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807819020106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807819020106

Keywords:

Navigation