Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Studying the Sunflower Husk Ash Properties after Husk Treatment Using Various Torrefaction Methods

  • STEAM BOILERS, POWER PLANT FUEL, BURNER UNITS, AND BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Plant cultivation waste (straw and husk of sunflower, rice, miller, and other cereal crops) feature low moisture and ash content, and their heating value is close to or even higher than that of many power plant coals. The utilization of such waste for energy-generation purposes could help solve environmental problems connected with decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, the chemical composition of the ash from this waste results in its having a low melting temperature, which causes the furnace slagging to occur and a rapid growth of ash deposits on the boiler convective heating surfaces. The well-known methods for waste pretreatment before combustion (water flushing and hydrothermal carbonization) feature excessive energy consumption and low yield. Therefore, it is proposed to estimate the effect on ash-melting properties of such a treatment method as torrefaction. Two biomass torrefaction methods were used: in the medium of gaseous torrefaction products in a plate reactor with a mechanically stirred biomass bed and fluidized bed torrefaction in a superheated steam medium. The chemical composition of the ash from biochars obtained using both methods is studied. Based on the known data, prediction criteria were calculated using which it is possible to estimate the possibility of biochar ash to melt, slag agglomerates to emerge, ash deposits to form on the boiler convective heating surfaces, and agglomerates to form during sunflower husk fluidized bed combustion. As is known, the use of prediction criteria often yields contradictory results. In view of this circumstance, for estimating the melting properties of ash from biochars and similar biomass, a 3D diagram was used, with the concentrations of various oxides contained in the ash marked on its axis. By using this diagram, the melting properties of the obtained biochars can be compared with those of other biomass kinds. This allows the following conclusion to be drawn: biochar produced as a result of torrefaction performed in a superheated steam medium is close in its fuel characteristics to wood waste; i.e., it can be combusted alone without additions or mixtures with other kinds of fuel having a refractory ash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M.-A. Perea-Moreno, F. Manzano-Agugliaro, and A.‑J. Perea-Moreno, “Sustainable energy based on sunflower seed husk boiler for residential buildings,” Sustainability 10, 3407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Cubitto and A. R. Gentili, “Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil by immobilized bacteria on an agroindustrial waste—Sunflower seed husks,” Biorem. J. 19, 277–286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2014.995376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. De Fusco, A. Boucquey, J. Blondeau, H. Jeanmart, and F. Contino, “Fouling propensity of high-phosphorus solid fuels: Predictive criteria and ash deposits characterisation of sunflower hulls with P/Ca-additives in a drop tube furnace,” Fuel 170, 16–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Jimenez-Gutierrez, R. A. J. Verlinden, P. C. van der Meer, L. A. M. van der Wielen, and A. J. J. Straathof, “Liquid hot water pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at lab and pilot scale,” Processes 9, 1518 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Runge, P. Wipperfurth, and C. Zhang, “Improving biomass combustion quality using a liquid hot water treatment,” Biofuels 4, 73–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Vamvuka and D. Zografos, “Predicting the behaviour of ash from agricultural wastes during combustion,” Fuel 83, 2051–2057 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Lebendig, I. Funcia, R. Pérez-Vega, and M. Müller, “Investigations on the effect of pre-treatment of wheat straw on ash-related issues in chemical looping gasification (CLG) in comparison with woody biomass,” Energies 15, 3422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Zhang, X. Chen, Z. Qi., H. Wang, R. Yang, W. Lin, J. Li, W. Zhou, and F. Ronsse, “Superheated steam as carrier gas and the sole heat source to enhance biomass torrefaction,” Bioresour. Technol. 331, 124955 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. L. Isemin, A. V. Melezhyk, S. N. Kuzmin, A. V. Nebyvayev, N. S. Muratova, A. V. Mikhalev, O. Y. Milovanov, Y. S. Teplitskii, E. K. Buchilko, E. A. Pitsukha, A. J. Grebenkov, M. Brule, and F. Tabet, “Production of activated carbon from biochar obtained by wet torrefaction of chicken manure as sole feedstock, and in mixture with sawdust in a fluidized bed powered with superheated steam,” Chem. Eng. Trans. 86, 1519–1524 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Isemin, A. Mikhalev, O. Milovanov, D. Klimov, V. Kokh-Tatarenko, M. Brulé, F. Tabet, A. Nebyvaev, S. Kuzmin, and V. Konyakhin, “Comparison of characteristics of poultry litter pellets obtained by the processes of dry and wet torrefaction,” Energies 15, 2153 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. GOST 32975.3-2014. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Moisture Content by Drying. Part 3. Moisture in General Analysis Sample (2016).

  12. GOST 32988-2014. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Ash Content (2016).

  13. GOST 33256-2015. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Total Sulphur and Chlorine Content (2016).

  14. GOST 32985-2014. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen by Instrumental Methods (2016).

  15. GOST 32990-2014. Solid Biofuel. Determination of the Content of Volatile Matter (2016).

  16. GOST 33106-2014. Solid Biofuel. Determination of Calorific Value (2016).

  17. GOST 10538-87. Solid Fuel. Methods for Determination of Chemical Composition of Ash (1988).

  18. GOST 32977-2014. Solid Mineral Fuel. Determination of Trace Elements in Ash by Atomic Absorption Method (2016).

  19. T. Onsree, N. Tippayawong, T. Williams, K. McCullough, E. Barrow, R. Pogaku, and J. Lauterbach, “Torrefaction of pelletized corn residues with wet flue gas,” Bioresour. Technol. 285, 121330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.-H. Park, Y.-C. Choi, Y.-J. Lee, and H.-T. Kim, “Characteristics of miscanthus fuel by wet torrefaction on fuel upgrading and gas emission behavior,” Energies 13, 2669 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Zhao, Agglomeration During Fluidized Bed Combustion and Gasification of Biomass (Technical Univ. of Denmark, 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Rizvi, P. Xing, M. Pourkashanian, L. I. Darvell, J. M. Jones, and W. Nimmo, “Prediction of biomass ash fusion behaviour by the use of detailed characterization methods coupled with thermodynamic analysis,” Fuel 141, 275–284 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Lachman, M. Baláš, M. Lisý, H. Lisá, P. Milčák, and P. Elbl, “An overview of slagging and fouling indicators and their applicability to biomass fuels,” Fuel Process. Technol. 217, 106804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Garcia-Maraver, J. Mata-Sanchez, M. Carpio, and J. A. Perez-Jimenez, “Critical review of predictive coefficients for biomass ash deposition tendency,” J. Energy Inst. 90, 214–228 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. V. Vassilev, D. Baxter, and Ch. G. Vassileva, “An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion. Part II: Ash fusion and ash formation mechanisms of biomass types,” Fuel 117, 152–183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. V. Vassilev, D. Baxter, and Ch. G. Vassileva, “An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion. Part I: Phase-mineral transformations of organic and inorganic matter,” Fuel 112, 391–449 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement no. 075-11-2022-034 of April 8, 2022, state contract ID 000000S407522QOZ0002; project title: Development of Technology and Setting Up Large-Scale Production of Sunflower Husk Biogranules with Characteristics Improved Due to Their High-Efficient Torrefaction. The leading implementer is the National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, 111250, Moscow, Russia

    A. V. Nebyvaev, O. Yu. Milovanov, D. V. Klimov, S. N. Kuz’min & A. V. Ryzhenkov

  2. OAO Head Special Design Office on Equipment Packages for Microclimate, 224014, Brest, Republic of Belarus

    V. A. Dubina & R. V. Zavizhenets

Authors
  1. A. V. Nebyvaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Yu. Milovanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. V. Klimov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. N. Kuz’min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. V. Ryzhenkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. V. A. Dubina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. V. Zavizhenets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Nebyvaev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Filatov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nebyvaev, A.V., Milovanov, O.Y., Klimov, D.V. et al. Studying the Sunflower Husk Ash Properties after Husk Treatment Using Various Torrefaction Methods. Therm. Eng. 70, 290–298 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601523040043

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601523040043

Keywords:

Search

Navigation