Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cofiring of Coal and Fossil Fuels is a Way to Decarbonization of Heat and Electricity Generation (Review)

  • STEAM BOILERS, POWER-PLANT FUELS, BURNER UNITS, AND BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cofiring of coal and biomass has been demonstrated to be a promising solution to the problem of partial decarbonization of electricity and heat generation. This technology meets the aims of sustainable development of the world community and complies with the UN documents on environment protection and control of greenhouse gas emission. The properties of biomass, which largely determine the selection of one or another solution for its cofiring with fossil fuels, are discussed. The biomass pretreatment, which makes the biomass properties closer to the coal properties, is important. The pretreatment techniques, including leaching, pelletization, torrefaction, and steam explosion, are examined. Data are presented on the process solutions in the form of direct or indirect combustion (gasification followed by combustion). The greatest share of biomass in cofiring can be attained with fluidized bed (FB) and circulating fluidized bed (CFB) technologies. Circulating fluidized bed boiler, their performance indicators, and the problems arising in their operation (such as slagging, bed agglomeration, fouling and corrosion of heating surfaces) are presented. It has been found that, compared to the conventional technology, the oxygen supported cofiring of coal and biomass in a CFB boiler can considerable reduce the recorded CO2 emission. The prospects are discussed concerning the application cofiring technologies in Russia, where huge reserves of unused wood and plant waste are available. It is demonstrated that requirements to reduce the carbon footprint in products may be an additional drive for the implementation cofiring technologies. However, this requires additional research and engineering activities, including studies of biomass pretreatment, safety of cofiring facilities, formation and control of harmful emission, especially during combustion in an oxygen environment with CO2 recirculation, the effect of biomass components (such as alkaline elements and chlorides) on the formation of deposits on heating surfaces, their corrosion, and bed agglomeration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Negative emissions mean that CO2 emissions from biomass combustion are not taken into account because plants absorb CO2.

REFERENCES

  1. X. Zhang and S. Meloni, Technology Developments in the Cofiring of Biomass (International Energy Agency Clean Coal Centre, London, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. N. Madanayake, S. Gan, C. Eastwick, and H. K. Ng, “Biomass as an energy source in coal co-firing and its feasibility enhancement via pre-treatment techniques,” Fuel Process. Technol. 159, 287–305 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Zabetta, J. Kovacs, and T. Eriksson, “Role and challenges of CFB in a changing energy market,” in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Fluidized Bed Technology, Krakow, Poland, 23–26 May 2017 (Fundacja dla Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej im. Stanisława Staszica, Kraków, 2017), pp. 77–83.

  4. K. Nuortimo, T. Jantti, and A. Khryasheva, “Development of CFB technology for creating high-capacity power units,” Elektr. Stn., No. 3, 29–35 (2018).

  5. G. A. Ryabov and I. A. Dolgushin, “Use of circulating fluidized bed technology at CHPPs co-firing biomass and fossil fuels,” Elektr. Stn., No. 10, 4–8 (2012).

  6. I. A. Dolgushin, G. A. Ryabov, and A. S. Sedlov, “Study and improvement of the TPP scheme with a CFB boiler in order to increase efficiency and improve environmental performance,” Energetik, No. 8, 33–36 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Scala, “Particle agglomeration in fluidized beds: Mechanisms, early detection and possible countermeasure,” Fuel Process. Technol. 171, 31–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. A. Ryabov, O. M. Folomeev, O. A. Smirnova, and D. S. Litun, “A study into the influence of different factors on the behavior of alkaline element concentrations that cause bed agglomeration,” Therm. Eng. 68, 72–81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521010171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. N. Zelikov, G. A. Ryabov, E. P. Dik, and A. N. Tugov, “Contamination and corrosion of the boiler steam superheaters at thermal power stations incinerating solid domestic wastes and biomass,” Therm. Eng. 55, 978–983 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Beiron, F. Normann, and F. Johnsson, “A case study of the potential for CCS in Swedish combined heat and power plants,” in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-15), Abu Dhabi, UAE, Mar. 15–18, 2021 (SSRN, Rochester, N.Y., 2021).

  11. H. Radomiak, A. BalaLitwiniak, M. Zajemska, and D. Musia, “Numerical prediction of the chemical composition of gas products at biomass combustion and co-combustion in a domestic boiler,” in Proc. Energy and Fuels 2016, Krakow, Poland, Sept. 21–23, 2016; E3S Web Conf. 14, 02043 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171402043

  12. Kh. El-Sheikh, G. A. Ryabov, and T. V. Bukharkina, “Features of the formation and suppression of sulfur oxides emissions on burning fuels in an oxygen environment with recirculation of CO2,” Elektr. Stn., No. 8, 18–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.34831/EP.2019.1057.44207

  13. Kh. El Sheikh, G. A. Ryabov, M. D. Khamid, T. V. Bukharkina, and M. A. Khusein, “The generation and suppression of NOx and N2O emissions in the oxy-fuel combustion process with recycled CO2 (an overview),” Therm. Eng. 67, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519120048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Middelkamp and M. Cremers, “Overview of global experience with biomass co-firing and coal to biomass conversions — Technology, fuel supply, byproducts and regulation, economics” (2018). https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/ 09/3.1-Jan-Middelkamp.pdf.

  15. J. S. Tumuluru, J. R. Hess, R. D. Boardman, C. T. Wright, and T. L. Westover, “Formulation, pretreatment, and densification options to improve biomass specifications for co-firing high percentages with coal,” Ind. Biotechnol. 8, 113–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2012.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Leckner, “The role of CFB in co-combustion,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Circulating Fluidized Beds in conjunction with 4th Int. VGB Workshop “Operating Experience with Fluidized Bed Firing Systems,” Hamburg, Germany, May 13–16, 2008 (TuTech Innovation, Hamburg, 2008), pp. 827–832.

  17. M. Cremers, J. Koppejan, J. Middelkamp, J. Witkamp, S. Sokhansanj, S. Melin, and S. Madrali, Status Overview of Torrefaction Technologies: A Review of the Commercialisation Status of Biomass Torrefaction (IEA Bioenergy, Paris, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Voegele, “Densified biomass fuel sales reach 670,000 tons in April,” Biomass Mag. (2020). http://biomassmagazine. com/articles/17995/eia-densified-biomassfuel-sales-reach-670-000-tons-in-january

  19. J. M. C. Ribeiro, R. Godina R, J. C. de O. Matias, and L. J. R. Nunes, “Future perspectives of biomass torrefaction: Review of the current state-of-the-art and research development,” Sustainability 10, 2323 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. L. Is’emin, A. V. Mikhalev, N. S. Muratova, V. S. Kokh-Tatarenko, Yu. S. Teplitskii, E. K. Buchilko, A. Zh. Greben’kov, and E. A. Pitsukha, “Improving the efficiency of biowaste torrefaction,” Therm. Eng. 66, 521–526 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519070048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. L. Shevchenko, G. A. Sytchev, and V. M. Zaichenko, “Possibility of the use of exothermic-reactions heat from thermal destruction of biomass to increase the energy efficiency of the torrefaction process,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1147, 012093 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1147/1/012093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. B. Direktor, V. M. Zaichenko, R. L. Is’emin, A. A. Chernyavskii, and A. L. Shevchenko, “Comparison of the efficiency of the reactors for low-temperature pyrolysis of biomass,” Therm. Eng. 67, 296–303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520050043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arbaflame has Signed a Major Contract with Engie (2019). https://www.arbaflame.no/

  24. M. Natunen, T. Jantti, D. Goral, and K. Nuortimo, “First operating experiences of 55 MWe Konin and 205 MWe Polaniec CFB boilers firing 100% biomass,” in Proc. Power-Gen Europe, Vienna, Austria, June 4–6, 2013.

  25. M. Bolhar-Nordencampf, A. Kokko, and J. Kinni, “Multifuel CVF solution — Producing power in flexible environment,” in Proc. VGB Congr., Essen, Germany, Oct. 13–14, 2017.

  26. T. Luomaharju, P. Lehtonen, K. Jalkanen, and P. Köykkä, “CFB boiler designs for demanding fuels,” in Proc. 21st Int. Conf. on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Naples, Italy, June 3–6, 2013.

  27. A. Kettunen, V. Barišić, E. C. Zabetta, and J. Kovács, “CFB flexible operation to enable the transition to renewable energy sources with maximum profitability,” in Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. on Fluidized Bed Conversion, Seoul, Korea, May 13–17, 2018, pp. 183–192.

  28. T. Jantti, R. Parkkonen, J. Burkle, and K. Nuortimo, “Start-up and early operating experience of Samcheok Green Power 4 × 550 MW supercritical circulatring fluidized-bed steam generators in South Korea,” in Proc. Power-Gen Europe, Cologne, Germany, June 26–29, 2017.

  29. A. T. Atimtay, U. Kayahan, A. Unlu, B. Engin, M. Varol, H. Olgun, and H. Atakul, “Co-firing of pine chips with Turkish lignites in 750 kWth circulating fluidized bed combustion system,” Bioresour. Technol. 224, 601–610 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Walter, W. Quick, P. L. Forero, R. Spörl, A. Fuller, M. A. D. Calvo, R. Youssefi, and J. Maier, Economic Low Carbon Power Production and Emissions Control for Future and Flexible Biomass Co-Fired Power Stations (BiOxySorb) (European Commission — Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels, Belgium, 2019). https://doi.org/10.2777/466007

  31. M. Iupion, I. Alvarez, P. Otera, R. Kuivalainen, J. lantto, A. Hotta, and Y. Hack, “30 MWth CIUDEN oxy-cfb boiler – first experiences,” Energy Procedia 37, 6179–6188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.547

  32. N. Jurado, H. G. Darabkhani, E. J. Anthony, and J. E. Oakey, “Oxy-combustion studies into the cofiring of coal and biomass blends: Effects on heat transfer, gas and ash compositions,” Energy Procedia 63, 440–452 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N. Jurado, N. J. Simms, E. J. Anthony, and J. E. Oakey, “Effect of co-firing coal and biomass blends on the gaseous environments and ash deposition during pilot-scale oxy-combustion trials,” Fuel 197, 145–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. C. Lupiáñez, M. C. Mayoral, L. I. Díez, E. Pueyo, S. Espatolero, and J. M. Andrés, “The role of limestone during fluidized bed oxy-combustion of coal and biomass,” Appl. Energy 184, 670–680 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Q. Liu, Y. Shi, W. Zhong, and A. Yu, “Co-firing of coal and biomass in oxy-fuel fluidized bed for CO2 capture: A review of recent advances,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 27, 2261–2272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2019.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Kumar, S. K. Mohapatra, and R. I. Singh, “Review on CFD modelling of fluidized bed combustion systems based on biomass and co-firing,” J. Inst. Eng. (India): Ser. C 99, 449–474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-017-0361-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A. A. Bhuiyan and J. Naser, “CFD modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel combustion in a large scale power plant,” Fuel 159, 150–168 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Chen, X. Wu, and L. Zhao, “Simulation of coal and biomass co-firing with different particle density and diameter in bubbling fluidized bed under O2/CO2 atmospheres,” J. Combust. 2018, 6931483 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6931483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Niu, H. Tan, and S. Hui, “Ash-related issues during biomass combustion: Alkali-induced slagging, silicate melt-induced slagging (ash fusion), agglomeration, corrosion, ash utilization, and related countermeasures,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 52, 1–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. D. E. Priyanto, S. Ueno, N. Sato, H. Kasai, T. Tanoue, and H. Fukushima, “Ash transformation by co-firing of coal with high ratios of woody biomass and effect on slagging propensity,” Fuel 174, 172–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. X. Ren, E. Rokni, Y. Liu, and Y. A. Levendis, “Reduction of HCl emissions from combustion of biomass by alkali carbonate sorbents or by thermal pretreatment,” J. Energy Eng. 144, 04018045 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Zimmerling, VGB, Essen, Germany, Personal Communication (2020).

  43. M. Oksa, J. Metsäjoki, and J. Kärki, “Corrosion testing of thermal spray coatings in a biomass co-firing power plant,” Coatings 6, 65 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6040065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2015). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. All-Russia Thermal Engineering Institute (OAO VTI), 115280, Moscow, Russia

    G. A. Ryabov

Authors
  1. G. A. Ryabov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. Ryabov.

Additional information

Translated by T. Krasnoshchekova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryabov, G.A. Cofiring of Coal and Fossil Fuels is a Way to Decarbonization of Heat and Electricity Generation (Review). Therm. Eng. 69, 405–417 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522060052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522060052

Keywords:

Search

Navigation