Skip to main content
Log in

On the Physics of the Development of Boiling Crisis Phenomena (Comments on the Article of E.D. Fedorovich “On the Expediency of Developing a Two-Stage Model of Boiling Crisis of a Liquid Wetting a Heating Surface”)

  • DISCUSSION
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a brief review of existing model approaches to the description of critical heat flux during nucleate boiling. In the context of the discussion presented in this issue of the journal, some arguments are outlined in favor of a mechanism governing the development of the boiling crisis, which is induced by the Landau instabilities at the interfacial surface during intensive evaporation in the liquid microfilm ensemble. Reliable justification of the assumptions adopted in developing the discussed models requires deeper and systematic investigations into the structure of a two-phase layer at the heat-transfer surface and its stage-wise evolutions as the critical heat flux is approached. It is demonstrated that it is critical in this case to find the dependence of the wetted surface percentage (considering the process unsteadiness) on the heat flux at various reduced pressures, wetting properties of the heat-transfer surface, thermal diffusivities, and heater wall thicknesses. It is also necessary to reveal the regularities of structure formation and determine the characteristic spatial and time scales for an evolving ensemble of microfilms in the macrolayer at the heat-transfer surface. Answers to these key issues will yield the necessary but currently insufficient information for constructing the most justified and complete (in terms of the number of stages included and variety of considered physical mechanisms of transient process development) theory of nucleate boiling crisis for elaboration of the most effective methods of boiling heat-transfer enhancement using micro- or nano-structured heat-transfer surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. E. D. Fedorovich, “On the expediency of developing a two-stage model of boiling crisis of a liquid wetting a heating surface,” Therm. Eng. 67, 844–846 (2020).

  2. V. V. Yagov, “On the mechanisms of boiling crisis (comment on the article of E. D. Fedorovich ‘On the expediency of developing a two-stage model of boiling crisis of a liquid wetting a heating surface’),” Therm. Eng. 67, 847–850 (2020).

  3. B. M. Avksentyuk, G. I. Bobrovich, S. S. Kutateladze, and V. N. Moskvicheva, “On the degeneration of the bubble boiling regime under conditions of free convection,” Zh. Prikl. Mekh. Tekh. Fiz., No. 1, 69–72 (1972).

  4. B. M. Avksentyuk, V. V. Ovchinnikov, and V. Ya. Plotnikov, “Dynamics of fluid boiling in the superheated area,” in Proc. All-Union Conf. on Heat Transfer in Steam Generators, Novosibirsk, June 28–30,1988 (Inst. Teplofiz. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Novosibirsk, 1988), pp. 304–308.

  5. A. N. Pavlenko and V. Yu. Chekhovich, “Critical heat flux at transient heat generation,” Izv. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Tekh. Nauk, No. 2, 3–9 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. N. Pavlenko, “Transient critical heat flux in liquid at different fixing laws of heat generation,” Izv. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Tekh. Nauk, No. 2, 131–137 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. N. Pavlenko, The Crisis of Heat Transfer at Transient Heat Generation and the Change Dynamics of Boiling Modes in a Large Volume of Cryogenic Liquid, Candidate’s Dissertation in Physics and Mathematics (Inst. of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of USSR Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 1990).

  8. A. N. Pavlenko, I. P. Starodubtseva, and V. Yu. Chekhovich, “Calculating model for critical heat flux and dynamical characteristics of film boiling regime development at transient heat generation on nonisothermal surfaces in cryogenic liquids,” Cryogenics 32, 241–244 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(92)90153-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. N. Pavlenko and V. V. Lel’, “Approximate model for calculation of self-sustaining evaporation front,” Thermophys. Aeromech. 6, 105–118 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. S. Kutateladze, “Hydromechanical model of heat transfer crisis in a boiling liquid under free convection,” Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 20, 1389–1392 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Zuber, “On the stability of boiling heat transfer,” Trans. ASME 80, 711–720 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Haramura and Y. Katto, “A new hydrodynamic model of critical heat flux, applicable widely to both pool and forced convection boiling on submerged bodies in saturated liquids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 26, 389–399 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(83)90043-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. I. I. Gogonin, “Dependence of the critical heat flux at boiling on the coolant physical properties,” Thermophys. Aeromech. 16, 115–122 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. V. Yagov and A. V. Sukach, “An approximate model for burnout at low reduced pressures,” Therm. Eng. 47, 200–204 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. V. Yagov, “The evolution of ideas about the mechanism of pool boiling crisis,” Vestn. MEI, No. 1, 11–20 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. V. Yagov, “The mechanism of the pool boiling crisis,” Therm. Eng. 50, 175–183 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. V. Yagov, “Is a crisis in pool boiling actually a hydrodynamic phenomenon?,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 73, 265–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.01.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V. V. Yagov, “Crisis in pool boiling: Alternative to hydrodynamic approach,” in Proc. 15th Int. Heat Transfer Conf. (IHTC-15), Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 10–15,2014 (Begell House, Redding, CT, 2014), pp. 6343–6357. https://doi.org/10.1615/IHTC15.pbl.009592

  19. A. N. Pavlenko, Transient Processes in Boiling and Evaporation, Doctor’s Dissertation in Physics and Mathematics (Inst. of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 2001).

  20. S. G. Kandlikar, “A theoretical model to predict pool boiling CHF incorporating effects of contact angle and orientation,” J. Heat Transfer 123, 1071–1079 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1409265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshits, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 6: Fluid Mechanics (Gostekhizdat, Moscow, 1944; Pergamon, Oxford, 1959).

  22. S. Nishio and H. Tanaka, “Visualization of boiling structures in high heat–flux pool-boiling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 4559–4568 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. S. Surtaev, V. S. Serdyukov, J. Zhou, A. N. Pavlenko, and V. Tumanov, “An experimental study of vapor bubbles dynamics at water and ethanol pool boiling at low and high heat fluxes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 126 (B), 297–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.001

  24. V. I. Zhukov and A. N. Pavlenko, “Crisis of nucleate boiling in a finite-height horizontal layer of liquid,” J. Eng. Thermophys. 29, 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232820010014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu. B. Zudin, “Landau instability at liquid film evaporation,” Thermophys. Aeromech. 22, 285–296 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. N. Pavlenko, A. A. Tairov, V. E. Zhukov, A. A. Levin, and M. I. Moiseev, “Dynamics of transient processes at liquid boiling-up in the conditions of free convection and forced flow in a channel under nonstationary heat release,” J. Eng. Thermophys. 23, 173–193 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232814030023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. V. E. Zhukov, A. N. Pavlenko, M. I. Moiseev, and D. V. Kuznetsov, “Dynamics of interphase surface of self-sustaining evaporation front in liquid with additives of nanosized particles,” High Temp. 55, 79–86 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. V. I. Zhukov and A. N. Pavlenko, “Heat transfer and critical phenomena during evaporation and boiling in a thin horizontal liquid layer at low pressures,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 117, 978–990 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am grateful to the editorial board of the Thermal Engineering journal for the chance to take part in this discussion and share some of my ideas on this issue, which is very important for the development of boiling physics and finding solutions to a number of new applied problems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Pavlenko.

Additional information

Translated by T. Krasnoshchekova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavlenko, A.N. On the Physics of the Development of Boiling Crisis Phenomena (Comments on the Article of E.D. Fedorovich “On the Expediency of Developing a Two-Stage Model of Boiling Crisis of a Liquid Wetting a Heating Surface”). Therm. Eng. 67, 853–859 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520110099

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601520110099

Keywords:

Navigation