Skip to main content
Log in

Effective ways to modernize outdated coal heat power plants

  • Steam Boilers, Energetic Fuel, Furnace Facilities, and Auxiliary Equipment of Boilers
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the state of equipment of 72 outdated coal HPP (heat power plants) of a total capacity 14.3 GW with steam parameters before the turbines p before ≤ 9 MPa, t before = 420–540°С was performed. The equipment is characterized by a considerably low efficiency factor, even if it were converted to burning the natural gas, and by increased release of harmful substances. However, on the most part of the considered HPP, the steam turbines, unlike the boilers, have thus far retained the operation applicability and satisfactory reliability of performance. The analysis has shown that it makes sense to effectively modernize the outdated coal HPP by transformation of their equipment into combined-cycle plant (CCP) with coal gasification, which has high economic and ecological indicators due to thermodynamic advantage of the combined cycle and simpler purification of the generator gas in the process under pressure. As the most rational way of this transformation, the one was recognized wherein—instead of the existing boiler (boilers) or parallel to it—a gasification and gas turbine system is installed with a boiler-utilizer (BU), from which steam is fed to the HPP main steam pipe. In doing this, the basic part of the power station equipment persists. In the world, this kind of reconstruction of steam power equipment is applied widely and successfully, but it is by use of natural gas for the most part. It is reasonable to use the technology developed at Heat Engineering Research Institute (HERI) of hearth-steam gasification of coal and high-temperature purification of the generator gas. The basic scheme and measures on implementation of this method for modernization of outdated coal HPP is creation of CCP with blast-furnace of coal on the basis of accessible and preserved HPP equipment. CCP power is 120 MW, input-output ratio (roughly) 44%, emissions of hazardous substances are 5 mg/МJ dust, 20–60 mg/МJ SO2, and 50–100 mg/МJ NO х . A considerable decrease of specific CCP cost is expected: down to approximately half compared to that of CCP with coal gasification created elsewhere abroad. Verification and debugging of accepted solutions can be carried out at a small-scale pilot plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. R. Kotler, D. V. Sosin, and A. V. Shtegman, “Solutions for the problem of nitrogen oxides emissions on active thermal power plants of Russia,” Elektr. Stn., No. 11, 9–12 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. P. Bezlepkin, Combined Cycle and Steam Turbine Units on Power Plants (S.-Peterb. Gos. Tekh. Univ., St. Petersburg, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Brzezina, “Repowering of steam power plants (STPP),” Presented at Seminár Energetika, Most, Czech, June 9, (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Claus, C., The Netherlands. Repowering. Case Study: Gas Product Solutions (Alstom, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. A. Treshchev, L. Yu. Danilov, T. R. Nigmatulin, A. V. Izmailov and M. A. Tuznikov, “Modernization of condensing turbines at the Kirishskaya GRES power plant, based on PGU-800,” Elektr. Stn., No. 11, 6–11 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Topical Report No. 20: The Wabash River Coal Gasification Repowering Project: An Update (US Dep. Energy, 2000).

  7. T. Moore, “Repowering as a competitive strategy,” EPRI J. 20 (5), 6–13 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. G. Ol’khovskii and V. V. Goncharov, “Experience of operation and new projects of combined cycle plants with coal gasification in power industry,” Energokhoz. Rubezhom, No. 6, 11–33 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. G. Ol’khovskii, Combined Cycle Plants with Coal Gasification (Analytical Review) (VTI, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. “Mitsubishi 250 MW demo plant on target for mid-2007 testing,” Gas Turbine World, 37 (1), 41 (2007).

  11. S. I. Suchkov, “Development of a domestic solid fuel gasification technology for combined cycle plants,” Bibl. Elektrotekh.: Prilozh. Zh. Energetik, No. 7, (2013).

  12. S. I. Suchkov, V. I. Babii., E. V. Shchukin, V. A. Nechaev, A. N. Abrosimov, Yu. N. Vtyurin, and L. A. Nikolaev, “Experimental elaboration and design of a steam-air blast furnace gas generator for a test combined cycle plant,” Elektr. Stn., No. 10, 27–35 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. http://www.interrao.ru/press-center/news.

  14. https://powergen.gepower.com.

  15. H. R. Hoy, A. G. Roberts, and D. M. Wilkins, “Behaviour of mineral water in slagging gasification processes,” Inst. Gas Eng. J. 5, 444–469 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. N. Alekhnovich and S. I. Suchkov, “Conditions for liquid slag yield in a VTI blast-furnace gas generator and improvement of slag removal node design,” Energetik, No. 10, 12–15 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. I. Suchkov, “Development of the procedure for calculating fuel gasification in blast-furnace gas generator,” Elektr. Stn., No. 10, 12–18 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Zevenhoven and P. Kilpinen, Control of Pollutants in Flue Gases and Fuel Gases (Helsinki Univ. Tech., Espoo, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. I. Suchkov and A. A. Somov, “Development of measures for suppressing nitrogen oxides formation in a combined cycle plant with intracyclic coal gasification,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Energ., No. 4, 84–92 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. N. Epikhin, I. O. Krylov, K. V. Timashkov, and A. A. Strokov, “A study of catalytic action of natural ferromarganese ores on the process of ammonia removal from generating gas,” Khim. Tverd. Topl., No. 4, 30–34 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. I. Suchkov, V. A. Nechaev, and A. A. Abrosimov, RF Patent 76914, Byull. Izobret., No. 28, (2008).

  22. S. I. Suchkov and I. P. Ivanova, “Practical results of research of the corrosion of power steels at coal gasification,” Elektr. Stn., No. 12, 50–54 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. G. Ol’khovskii, S. I. Suchkov, P. A. Berezinets, A. N. Epikhin, I. O. Krylov, I. G. Lugovskaya, A. A. Somov, V. N. Gudkov, and A. A. Zaikin, “Development of a domestic combined cycle plant with coal gasification,” Therm. Eng. 57 (2), 113–120 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. D. Sulimov, “Gas-turbine units of OAO Aviadvigatel’ designed for operation on synthesis gas obtained from gasification of coal,” Therm. Eng. 57 (2), 121–124 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. B. Bogdanov, “National energy efficiency of Russia,” Energosberezhenie, No. 5, 46–53 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. I. Suchkov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.I. Suchkov, V.R. Kotler, V.A. Batorshin, 2016, published in Teploenergetika.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suchkov, S.I., Kotler, V.R. & Batorshin, V.A. Effective ways to modernize outdated coal heat power plants. Therm. Eng. 63, 852–862 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516120053

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516120053

Keywords

Navigation