Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative environmental assessment of unconventional power installations

  • Energy Conservation, New and Renewable Energy Sources
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Procedure of the strategic environmental assessment of the power installations operating on the basis of renewable energy sources (RES) was developed and described. This procedure takes into account not only the operational process of the power installation but also the whole life cycles: from the production and distribution of power resources for manufacturing of the power installations to the process of their recovery. Such an approach gives an opportunity to make a more comprehensive assessment of the influence of the power installations on environments and may be used during adaptation of the current regulations and development of new regulations for application of different types of unconventional power installations with due account of the ecological factor. Application of the procedure of the integrated environmental assessment in the context of mini-HPP (Hydro Power Plant); wind, solar, and biogas power installations; and traditional power installation operating natural gas was considered. Comparison of environmental influence revealed advantages of new energy technologies compared to traditional ones. It is shown that solar energy installations hardly pollute the environment during operation, but the negative influence of the mining operations and manufacturing and utilization of the materials used for solar modules is maximum. Biogas power installations are on the second place as concerns the impact on the environment due to the considerable mass of the biogas installation and gas reciprocating engine. The minimum impact on the environment is exerted by the mini-HPP. Consumption of material and energy resources for the production of the traditional power installation is less compared to power installations on RES; however, this factor incomparably increases when taking into account the fuel extraction and transfer. The greatest impact on the environment is exerted by the operational process of the traditional power installations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Project of the Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period Up to the Year 2035. http://minenergo.gov.ru/documents/razrabotka/17481.html [in Russian].

  2. Russian Federation State Program Energy Efficiency and Power Industry Development, Approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 321 dated April 15, 2014.

  3. V. E. Fortov and O. S. Popel’, “The current status of the development of renewable energy sources worldwide and in Russia,” Therm. Eng. 61(6), 389 (2014). doi: 10.1134/S0040363614060022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Pachurin, O. V. Masleeva, and E. N. Sosnina, Environmental Aspects of Biopower Engineering (LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Germany, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. N. Sosnina, O. V. Masleeva, G. V. Pachurin, A. Yu. Kechkin, and N. N. Golovkin, Environmental Problems of Renewable Sources of Energy: (Nizhny Novgorod Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Nizhny Novgorod, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Directive 2009/125/EC of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products,” Off. J. Eur. Union 52, L 285/10-L 285/35 (2009).

  7. GOST (State Standard) R ISO 14040-2010: Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework (Standardinform, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

  8. E. N. Sosnina, O. V. Masleeva, G. V. Pachurin, and E. V. Kryukov, “Environmental assessment of renewable energy sources production process,” Sovr. Probl. Nauki Obr., No. 6, 174–180 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. G. Sazonov, Planning and Predicting under Market Conditions: A Handbook (TIDOT DVGU, Vladivostok, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Ya. Vagin and E. N. Sosnina, Power Supply Systems: An Education-and-Methodical Complex, 2nd ed. (Nizhny Novgorod Tekhn. Univ, Nizhny Novgorod, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. A Methodical Handbook for Calculation, Standardization, and Monitoring of Polluting Emissions into the Atmosphere (NII Atmosfery, St. Petersburg, 2012) [in Russian].

  12. I. N. Bereshko and A. V. Betin, Mathematical Models in Ecology. Part 1: A Handbook (Nats. Khark. Aerokosm. Univ., Kharkiv, 2006) [in Ruassian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Technical Description of the Musson Family of Wind Generators. http://elvision.ru/catalog/visten/vgrt/vgmus_59.html.

  14. The Pr30 Hydraulic Unit Driven by a Propeller Turbine. http://www.inset.ru/r-offers/Pr_30.htm.

  15. Saana 245-260 LM3 MBW Single-Crystal Modules. http://www.multiwood.ru/pv/S245-260LM3MBW.

  16. Biogas Installations for Agriculture Produced by AO EKOROS Center. http://itk-energo.narod.ru/Predlogenie1.3.htm.

  17. Caterpillar Gas Power Stations: Gas Piston Units of Caterpillar. http://www.manbw.ru/analitycs/caterpillar.html.

  18. A Collection of Specific Indicators Characterizing the Generation of Production and Consumption Wastes. http://www.recyclers.ru/uploads/library/specific_showing.pdf.

  19. Aggregated Norms of Water Consumption and Water Removal for Different Industry Branches (Stroiizdat, Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].

  20. A Handbook for Designing Electric Networks, Ed. by D. L. Faibisovich, 4th ed. (ENAS, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. N. Sosnina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.N. Sosnina, O.V. Masleeva, E.V. Kryukov, 2015, published in Teploenergetika.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sosnina, E.N., Masleeva, O.V. & Kryukov, E.V. Comparative environmental assessment of unconventional power installations. Therm. Eng. 62, 539–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601515080078

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601515080078

Keywords

Navigation