Abstract
We study bound states in an s-wave superconducting strip on the surface of a topological superconductor with the perpendicular Zeeman field. We prove analytically that an arbitrarily small local perturbation of the Zeeman field generates Andreev bound states with energies near the superconducting gap edges, while the (nonmagnetic) impurity potential does not produce such an effect. Rather large perturbations of the Zeeman field can lead to the appearance of Andreev bound states with energies near zero. We analytically find wave functions of the Andreev bound states under consideration. In contrast to the one-dimensional case, the wave functions do not satisfy the conjugation conditions that are characteristic of Majorana states because of the influence of neighboring subbands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Alicea, “New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems,” Rep. Prog. Phys., 75, 076501, 36 pp. (2012).
F. von Oppen, Y. Peng, and F. Pientka, “Topological superconducting phases in one dimension,” in: Topological Aspects of Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School (École de Physique des Houches, Session CIII, 4–29 August, 2014 C. Chamon, M. O. Goerbig, R. Moessner, and L. F. Cugliandolo, eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2017), pp. 389–449.
M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, “Majorana fermions and topology in superconductors,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 85, 072001, 32 pp. (2016).
C.-X. Liu, J. D. Sau, T. D. Stanescu, and S. Das Sarma, “Andreev bound states versus Majorana bound states in quantum dot-nanowire-superconductor hybrid structures: Trivial versus topological zero-bias conductance peaks,” Phys. Rev. B, 96, 075161, 29 pp. (2017).
T. D. Stanescu and S. Tewari, “Robust low-energy Andreev bound states in semiconductor- superconductor structures: Importance of partial separation of component Majorana bound states,” Phys. Rev. B, 100, 155429, 21 pp. (2019); arXiv: 1811.02557.
C. Moore, C. Zeng, T. D. Stanescu, and S. Tewari, “Quantized zero bias conductance plateau in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures without non-Abelian Majorana zero modes,” Phys. Rev. B, 98, 155314, 6 pp. (2018); arXiv: 1804.03164.
J. Cayao and A. M. Black-Schaffer, “Distinguishing trivial and topological zero-energy states in long nanowire junctions,” Phys. Rev. B, 104, L020501, 6 pp. (2021).
B. D. Woods, S. Das Sarma, and T. D. Stanescu, “Subband occupation in semiconductor- superconductor nanowires,” Phys. Rev. B, 101, 045405, 13 pp. (2020); arXiv: 1910.04362.
Yu. P. Chuburin and T. S. Tinyukova, “The emergence of bound states in a superconducting gap at the topological insulator edge,” Phys. Lett. A, 384, 126694, 7 pp. (2020).
B. D. Woods, J. Chen, S. M. Frolov, and T. D. Stanescu, “Zero-energy pinning of topologically trivial bound states in multiband semiconductor-superconductor nanowires,” Phys. Rev. B, 100, 125407, 17 pp. (2019); arXiv: 1902.02772.
Z. Hou and J. Klinovaja, “Zero-energy Andreev bound states in iron-based superconductor Fe(Te,Se),” arXiv: 2109.08200.
Yu. P. Chuburin and T. S. Tinyukova, “Interaction between subbands in a quasi-one-dimensional superconductor,” Theoret. and Math. Phys., 210, 398–410 (2022).
T. D. Stanescu, J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, “Proximity effect at the superconductor-topological insulator interface,” Phys. Rev. B, 81, 241310, 4 pp. (2010); arXiv: 1002.0842.
J. Linder, Yu. Tanaka, T. Yokoyama, A. Sudbo, and N. Nagaosa, “Interplay between superconductivity and ferromagnetism on a topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. B, 81, 184525, 11 pp. (2010).
C. T. Olund and E. Zhao, “Current-phase relation for Josephson effect through helical metal,” Phys. Rev. B, 86, 214515, 7 pp. (2012).
F. Crepin, B. Trauzettel, and F. Dolcini, “Signatures of Majorana bound states in transport properties of hybrid structures based on helical liquids,” Phys. Rev. B, 89, 205115, 12 pp. (2014).
A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, “Multichannel generalization of Kitaev’s Majorana end states and a practical route to realize them in thin films,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 227003, 4 pp. (2010); arXiv: 1007.4569.
J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Wiley, New York (1972).
P. Szumniak, D. Chevallier, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, “Spin and charge signatures of topological superconductivity in Rashba nanowires,” Phys. Rev. B, 96, 041401, 5 pp. (2017).
M. Serina, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, “Boundary spin polarization as a robust signature of a topological phase transition in Majorana nanowires,” Phys. Rev. B, 98, 035419, 10 pp. (2018).
Yu. P. Chuburin and T. S. Tinyukova, “Behaviour of Andreev states for topological phase transition,” Theoret. and Math. Phys., 208, 977–992 (2021).
Funding
Chuburin’s work was supported by the financial program AAAA-A16-116021010082-8. Tinyukova’s work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the framework of state assignment No. 075-01265-22-00, project FEWS-2020-0010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, 2022, Vol. 212, pp. 414–428 https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf10297.
Appendix
To find the Green’s function of the Hamiltonian \(H^{(n)}\), we find the function \(\Psi\) from the equation \((H^{(n)}-E)\Psi=\Phi\). We rewrite this equation in the form
To find the Green’s function in the coordinate representation using formulas (A.6), we integrate equalities (A.5) over \(p\). Because of the conditions for the quantities \(1/W\) and \(|M-\Delta |\) (see Sec. 2), when integrating over the region where the \(p\) are small, the denominator of the second term in the factor before the matrix in (A.5) is much larger than that of the first term, and the integrals over the region where \(p\) are rather large are small. Thus, the second term in (A.5) can be neglected. Although the remaining integrals are taken over the entire number line, the smallness of their denominators for small \(p\) under the adopted conditions for the parameters makes these integrals mainly saturated by small \(p\), and the condition for the smallness of the momenta \(p\) (see the assumptions after (11)) is satisfied. This reasoning is easily confirmed by numerical estimations.
Based on the foregoing, we use (A.5) and (A.6) to obtain the Green’s function of the Hamiltonian \(H^{(n)}\) in the coordinate representation:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chuburin, Y.P., Tinyukova, T.S. Andreev states in a quasi-one-dimensional superconductor on the surface of a topological insulator. Theor Math Phys 212, 1246–1258 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577922090070
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577922090070