Skip to main content
Log in

A \(p\)-arton model for modular cusp forms

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To a modular form, we propose to associate \((\)an infinite number of\()\) complex-valued functions on \(p\)-adic numbers \(\mathbb{Q}_p\) for each prime \(p\). We elaborate on the correspondence and study its consequences in terms of the Mellin transform and the \( L \)-function related to the form. Further, we discuss the case of products of Dirichlet \( L \)-functions and their Mellin duals, which are convolution products of \(\vartheta\)-series. The latter are intriguingly similar to nonholomorphic Maass forms of weight zero as suggested by their Fourier coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. More precisely, the relevant groups are the projective special linear groups \(PSL(2,\mathbb{R})=SL(2,\mathbb{R}/\{\pm\}\)) and \(PSL(2,\mathbb{Z})=SL(2,\mathbb{Z})/\{\pm 1\}\).

  2. A Dirichlet character (modulo \(N\)) is a group homomorphism \(\chi_{{}_N}\in Hom(G(N),\mathbb{C}^*)\) from the multiplicative group \(G(N)=(\mathbb{Z}/N\mathbb{Z})^*\) of invertible elements of \(\mathbb{Z}/N\mathbb{Z}\) to \(\mathbb{C}^*\). It is a multiplicative character. It is customarily extended to all integers by setting \(\chi_{{}_N}(m)=0\) for all \(m\) that share common factors with \(N\) [14].

  3. By an abuse of notation, we continue to use the same symbol for the restrictions of the raising and lowering operators to \(\mathcal H^{(p)}_{-}\). Because it is the subspace that is of primary interest to us, this should hopefully not be a cause of confusion.

  4. In [18], the multiplicative character in the kernel is taken to be unitary, which is satisfied if \(s\) in (25) is purely imaginary. The definition in [21] (see definitions 2.8.4 and 2.8.5) uses a normalized unitary character \(\omega\), which has a conductor \(p^N\), which in this case is \(N=1\).

  5. We became aware of these results after submitting a version of this paper to the arXiv.

  6. For modular forms of weight \(k=1\), the two inner products (38) and (41) are the same.

References

  1. A. Dabholkar, “Ramanujan and quantum black holes”; arXiv: 1905.04060.

  2. A. Dabholkar and S. Nampuri, “Quantum black holes,” in: Strings and Fundamental Physics (Munich/Garching, Germany, July 25 – August 6, 2010, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 851, M. Baumgartl, I. Brunner, and M. Haack, eds.), Springer, Berlin (2012), pp. 165–232; arXiv: 1208.4814.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. H. M. Edwards, Riemann’s Zeta Function, Dover, Mineola, NY (2001).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Dutta and D. Ghoshal, “Pseudodifferential operators on \(\mathbf{Q}_p\) and \(L\)-series,” accepted for publication in \(p\)-Adic Numbers Ultrametric Anal. Appl.; arXiv: 2003.00901.

  5. V. Vladimirov, I. Volovic, and E. Zelenov, \(p\)-Adic Analysis and Mathematical Physics, (Series On Soviet and East European Mathematics, Vol. 1), World Sci., Singapore (1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. S. V. Kozyrev, “Wavelet theory as \(p\)-adic spectral analysis,” Izv. Math., 66, 367–376 (2002); arXiv: math-ph/0012019.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Chattopadhyay, P. Dutta, S. Dutta, and D. Ghoshal, “Matrix model for Riemann zeta via its local factors,” Nucl. Phys. B, 954, 114996, 37 pp. (2020); arXiv: 1807.07342.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Spector, “Supersymmetry and the Möbius inversion function,” Commun. Math. Phys., 127, 239–252 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Julia, “Statistical theory of numbers,” in: Number Theory and Physics (Proceedings of the Winter School, Les Houches, France, August 7–16, 1989, Springer Proceedings in Physics, Vol. 47, J.-M. Luck, P. Moussa, and M. Waldschmidt, eds.), Springer, Berlin (1990), pp. 276–293.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Bakas and M. Bowick, “Curiosities of arithmetic gases,” J. Math. Phys., 32, 1881–1884 (1991).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. B. L. Julia, “Thermodynamic limit in number theory: Riemann–Beurling gases,” Phys. A, 203, 425–436 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Dutta and D. Ghoshal, “Phase operator on \(L^2(\mathbb{Q}_p)\) and the zeroes of Fisher and Riemann,” in: Advances in Non-Archimedean Analysis and Applications. The \(p\)-adic Methodology in STEAM-H (STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health, W. Zúñiga-Galindo and Bourama Toni, eds.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Lewis and D. Zagier, “Period functions for Maass wave forms. I,” Ann. Math., 153, 191–258 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J.-P. Serre, A Course in Arithmetic, (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 7), Springer, New York, Heidelberg (1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. N. I. Koblitz, Introduction to Elliptic Curves and Modular Forms, (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 97), Springer, New York (1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. E. J. Warner, “Modular forms and \(L\)-functions: a crash course,” https://www.math.columbia.edu/\(\sim\)warner/notes/ ClassicalModularForms.pdf.

  17. A. Sutherland, “Modular forms and \(L\)-functions,” https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/97521/18-783-spring-2013/contents/.

  18. I. I. Pyatetskii-Shapiro, I. M. Gel’fand, and M. I. Graev, Representation Theory and Automorphic Functions (Saunders Mathematics Books), W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia (1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Yu. Khrennikov, S. V. Kozyrev, and W. A. Zúñiga-Galindo, Ultrametric Pseudodifferential Equations and Applications (Encyclopedia Math. Appl., Vol. 168), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2018).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Dutta, D. Ghoshal, and A. Lala, “Enhanced symmetry of the \(p\)-adic wavelets,” Phys. Lett. B, 783, 421–427 (2018); arXiv: 1804.00958.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Goldfeld and J. Hundley, Automorphic Representations and \(L\)-Functions for the General Linear Group, Vol. 1, (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 129), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. J. B. Conrey, W. Duke, and D. W. Farmer, “The distribution of the eigenvalues of Hecke operators,” Acta Arith., 78, 405–409 (1997); arXiv: math/9609214.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. J.-P. Serre, “Répartition asymptotique des valeurs propres de l’opérateur de Hecke \(T_p\),” J. Amer. Math. Soc., 10, 75–102 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. T. M. Apostol, Introduction to Analytical Number Theory, Springer, New York (1976).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, New York (2014).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

One of us (DG) presented a preliminary version of some of these results (as well as those in [4]) at the National String Meeting 2019 held at IISER Bhopal, India during December 22–27, 2019. We would like to thank Chandan Singh Dalawat and Vijay Patankar for the useful discussions. We are particularly grateful to Krishnan Rajkumar for many patient explanations and valuable comments on the manuscript.

Funding

D. Ghoshal is supported in part by the Mathematical Research Impact Centric Support (MATRICS) of the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (grant no. MTR/2020/000481).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Dutta.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, 2021, Vol. 209, pp. 101–124 https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf10108.

Appendix: Wavelets on $$\pmb{\mathbb{Q}}_p^\times$$

We modify the Kozyrev wavelets to define

$$ \boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{n,m,j}(x)=|x|_p^{1/2}\psi^{(p)}_{n,m,j}(x),$$
(A.1)
which are naturally defined on \(\mathbb{Q}_p^\times\) because they are orthonormal with respect to the scale invariant multiplicative Haar measure \(d^\times x\):
$$ \int_{\mathbb{Q}_p^\times}\frac{dx}{|x|_p}\boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{n,0,1}(x)\boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{n',0,1}(x)= \int_{\mathbb{Q}_p} dx\,\psi^{(p)}_{n,0,1}(x)\psi^{(p)}_{n',0,1}(x)=\delta_{nn'}.$$
(A.2)
We note that the wavelets above, being different from Kozyrev wavelets (13) by a coordinate dependent factor, are not equal to the constant \(p^{-n/2}\) for \(|x|_p<p^n\), although they are still locally constant functions on \(\mathbb{Q}_p\). The raising and lowering operators in (18) and (20) act as before:
$$\mathbf{a}^{(p)}_\pm\boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{n,0,1}(x)=\boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{n\pm 1,0,1}(x),\qquad \mathbf{a}^{(p)}_{+}\boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{1,0,1}(x)=0,$$
but we choose to use a different notation to emphasize the fact that they act on a different space of functions. Mellin transform (25) of these modified wavelets
$$\mathcal M_{(p,\omega)}[\boldsymbol{\Psi}^{(p)}_{n,0,1}](s)= \mathbf c_p(\ell,s)p^{ns}= -\biggl(\frac{1}{p(1-p^{-s-1/2})}-\frac{1}{p^{s+1/2}-1}\,\delta_{\ell,0} -\delta_{\ell,p-1}\biggr)p^{ns}$$
likewise differs somewhat from (27). We note that
$$\sum_{\ell}|\mathbf c_p(\ell,s)|^2=1+\frac{1-|p^s|^2}{|p^{s+1/2}-1|^2},$$
and hence, if the argument \(s\) is purely imaginary, the sum is 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, P., Ghoshal, D. A \(p\)-arton model for modular cusp forms. Theor Math Phys 209, 1403–1422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577921100068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577921100068

Keywords

Navigation