Abstract
Following Gepner’s approach, we propose a construction of models of tensor product orbifolds of the minimal models of two-dimensional field theory with \(N=2\) superconformal symmetry. To build models that satisfy the requirements of modular invariance, we use a spectral flow transformation. We demonstrate this construction with a specific example and show that its application ensures the modular invariance of the partition function simultaneously with the mutual locality of the fields of the theory under consideration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Gepner, “Exactly solvable string compactifications on manifolds of \({\rm SU}(N)\) holonomy,” Phys. Lett. B, 199, 380–388 (1987); “Space-time supersymmetry in compactified string theory and superconformal models,” Nucl. Phys. B, 296, 757–778 (1988).
B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser, “Duality in Calabi–Yau moduli space,” Nucl. Phys. B, 338, 15–37 (1990).
F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. Olive, “Supersymmetry, supergravity theories and the dual spinor model,” Nucl. Phys. B, 122, 253–290 (1977).
T. Eguchi, H. Ooguri, A. Taormina, and S.-K. Yang, “Superconformal algebras and string compactification on manifolds with \({\rm SU}(n)\) holonomy,” Nucl. Phys. B, 315, 193–221 (1989).
B. L. Feigin, A. M. Semikhatov, V. A. Sirota, and I. Yu. Tipunin, “Resolutions and characters of irredicible representations of the \(N=2\) superconformal algebra,” Nucl. Phys. B, 536, 617–656 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9805179.
B. L. Feigin and A. M. Semikhatov, “Free-field resolutions of the unitary \(N=2\) super-Virasoro representations”; arXiv: hep-th/9810059.
W. Lerche, C. Vafa, and N. P. Warner, “Chiral rings in \(N=2\) superconformal theories,” Nucl. Phys. B, 324, 427–474 (1989).
A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, “Comments on the \(N=2,3,4\) superconformal algebras in two dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B, 184, 191–196 (1987).
A. B. Zamolodchikov and V. A. Fateev, “Disorder fields in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and \(N=2\) extended supersymmetry,” Sov. Phys. JETP, 63, 913–919 (1986).
P. Di Vecchia, J. L. Petersen, and M. Yu, “On the unitary representations of \(N=2\) superconformal algebra,” Phys. Lett. B, 172, 211–215 (1986); P. Di Vecchia, J. L. Petersen, M. Yu, and H. B. Zheng, “Explicit construction of the \(N=2\) superconformal algebra,” Phys. Lett. B, 174, 280–284 (1986); S. Nam, “The Kac formula for the \(N=1\) and \(N=2\) super-conformal algebras,” Phys. Lett. B, 172, 323–327 (1986).
B. L. Feigin, A. M. Semikhatov, and I. Yu. Tipunin, “Equivalence between chain categories of representations of affine \(sl(2)\) and \(N=2\) superconformal algebras,” J. Math. Phys., 39, 3865–3905 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9701043.
M. Krawitz, “FJRW rings and Landau–Ginsburg mirror symmetry”; arXiv: 0906.0796.
P. Berglund and T. Hübsch, “A generalized construction of mirror manifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B, 393, 377–391 (1993); arXiv: hep-th/9201014.
A. Belavin and B. Eremin, “On the equivalence of Batyrev and BHK mirror symmetry constructions,” Nucl. Phys. B, 961, 115271, 10 pp. (2020); arXiv: 2010.07687.
L. Dixon, J. H. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “Strings on orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B, 261, 678–686 (1985); “Strings on orbifolds (II),” 274, 285–314 (1986).
Funding
The work of S. Parkhomenko (sections 1–3) was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant 18-12-00439. The results of A. Belavin (sections 4–6) were obtained with the support of the program no. 0029-2019-0004 “Quantum field theory” of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, 2021, Vol. 209, pp. 59–81 https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf10145.
To the memory of William Everett
Appendix
Here, we derive the rules for modular transformations of characters in Eqs. (73) and (75) and shift relations (77) using the spectral flow and modular properties of the minimal model characters.
We first examine the modular properties of characters of an individual minimal model. Namely, for each pair \(l\), \(t\) labeling a representation of the \(N=2\) superconformal minimal model and for each pair \(n,p\in \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{Z}\), we introduce the character
Using (33) and (38), we obtain
From definitions (90) and (13), we obtain the shift relations for integer \(q\):
Based on rules (91), (92) and relation (93), we can conclude that for integer \(n\) and \(p\), characters (90) and (94) transform as
The modular properties and shift relations for the products of minimal-model characters in (71), arising in the construction of the partition function of the orbifold by group (65), now follow by a direct generalization of the corresponding expressions for the minimal model. The shift relations take the form
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belavin, A.A., Parkhomenko, S.E. Explicit construction of \(N=2\) superconformal orbifolds. Theor Math Phys 209, 1367–1386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577921100044
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040577921100044