Abstract
The four electronic states (2Σ−, 2Π, 4Σ−, and 4Π) of CuC corresponding to the lowest dissociation limits Cu(2 S g ) + C(3 P g ) are calculated by using multi-reference configuration interaction method with Davidson correction (MRCI + Q) approach in combination with the effective core potentials (ECPs) basis sets LANLTZ for the Cu atom and 6–311+g(d) basis sets for the C atom. The calculation covers the internuclear distance ranging from 0.04 to 0.54 nm, and the equilibrium bond length R e and the vertical excited energy T e are determined directly. The potential energy curves (PECs) show that the lowest two states are the 4Σ− and 2Π, and 4Σ− is the ground state where the 2Π state is higher than 4Σ− about 0.28 eV. With the potentials, all of the vibrational levels and rotational constants are predicted by numerically solving the radial Schröbinger equation of nuclear motion. Then the spectroscopic data of ωe, ωe x e, B e, and αe are obtained after data fitting which are compared with theoretical results currently available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Pyun, H. Choi, J. B. Park, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 212907 (2008).
D. I. Kim, J. Yoon, J. B. Park, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 152107 (2011).
A. Kalemos, T. H. Dunning, Jr., and A. Mavridis, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 174306 (2008).
G. L. Gutsev, L. Andrews, and C. W. Bauschlicher, Jr., Theor. Chem. Acc. 109, 298 (2003).
Y. Q. Xu, X. M. Gao, and W. J. Zhang, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 23, 1075 (2007).
N. B. Balabanov and K. A. Peterson, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 074110 (2006).
N. B. Balabanov and K. A. Peterson, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 064107 (2005).
X. N. Zhang, D. H. Shi, J. F. Sun, and Z. L. Zhu, Chin. Phys. B 20, 043105 (2011).
F. Neese, Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 73 (2012).
Y. R. Dong, S. D. Zhang, S. W. Hou, et al., Chin. Phys. B 21, 083104 (2012).
D. M. Liu and S. D. Zhang, Acta Phys. Sin. 61, 033101 (2012).
H. Gerard, E. R. Davidson, and O. Eisenstein, Mol. Phys. 100, 533 (2002).
S. Larsson, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 111, 3424 (2011).
P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 299 (1985).
K. L. Schuchardt, B. T. Didier, T. Elsethagen, et al., J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47, 1045 (2007).
P. J. Hay and W. R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 284 (1985).
L. E. Roy, P. J. Hay and R. L. Martin, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 1029 (2008).
R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980).
C. F. Bunge, J. A. Barrientos, and A. V. Bunge, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 53, 113 (1993).
S. R. Langhoff and E. R. Davidson, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 8, 61 (1974).
R. J. le Roy, LEVEL 8.0, A computer program for solving the radial Schrodinger equation for bound and quasibound levels (University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, C., Zhang, S.D. MRCI calculations of the low-lying electronic states of CuC. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 89, 1047–1050 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024415060199
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024415060199