Abstract
The outcomes from the survey research in distribution of the giant grenadier Coryphaenoides pectoralis at different stages of development in the Northwest Bering Sea over 1963–2020 have been reported. The data for 37 thousand catches performed with the bottom and multi-depth trawls at the depths between 0–1200 m are processed. It has been revealed that the species fish tend to spawn throughout the year, with two periods of peak spawning activity in the second half of a spring season and from the late summer season to the first half of an autumn season. The female fish ready to spawn migrate down the water column, keeping deeper than 600 m, where the males ready to spawn are concentrated. After spawning, they come back to the feeding areas of less water depths. The juvenile giant grenadier less than 30 cm in length can be encountered in the mesopaelagic and upper bathypelagic zones, which do not appear to form dense aggregations. The majority of the specimens less than 30–40 cm in length and smaller commonly leave this water column layer to occupy the bottom water layers along the continental shelf. Such differentiation between the juvenils and the sexually mature specimens can provide the opportunity to avoid cannibalism and to use the habitat food sources efficiently.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Over the last 50 years, fishing has moved from the continental shelf areas toward the deeper waters. Therefore, the marine biota in these aquatic ecosystems, including fish comunities, is under threat across seas (Vinnichenko et al., 2005). Deep-water trawling is the least sustainable type of fishing. There are many examples of its results in fish stock depletion (Clark and Koslow, 2007; Pitcher et al., 2010). The principal requirements to data on fishing activity for the deep-water species are not different from the requirements to fishing deal for any other fish stocks, since it is necessary to know the life-cycle characteristics of the target species and afford to monitor the dynamics of its population (Francis and Clark, 2005). A considerable number of deep-water fish species have been overfished because of unavailable data on their life cycles. Therefore, fish stocks in many global ocean regions are depleted (Watling et al., 2011). In addition, it concerns the grenadier fish (Devine et al., 2012).
Grenadier fish are recorded practically in all the trawl and multi-level continental-shelf fishery systems worldwide, which includes the most frequent bycatches in deep-water fishing operations (Tuponogov, 1991, 2018; Tuponogov et al., 2008; Orlov and Tokranov, 2008, 2019). The giant grenadier Coryphaenoides pectoralis (Gilbert, 1892) (Gadiformes: Macrouridae) is caught in the Northern Pacific as both a bycatch species in commercial fishing for the Greenland turbot Reinhardtius hippoglossoides and the target species. It inhabits the bottom water layers. However, the species can be found in a wide depth range of 140–3500 m (Tuponogov and Novikov, 2016). Until the mid of 1970s, the giant grenadier fish were considered most abundant at depths of between 700–1100 m (Novikov, 1970, 1974). Later, the depth range was extended to 600–1700 m (Тupohogov, 1991, 2018; Tuponogov et al., 2008). Despite the increasing interest of fisheries enterpreneurs in this object and the development of fishing gear technology, many patterns of distribution and biology of the giant grenadier remain scarcely studied. The major reasons comlicating the studies are great water depths inhabited with the species and seabed complex environments, which makes it impossible for bottom trawling for fish stocks across the most habitat area (Tuponogov, 1991; Оrlov, 2007; Orlov and Tokranov, 2008; Tuponogov and Novikov, 2016). At present, the highest catches of the giant grenadier inhabiting the North Pacific zone are recorded in the Bering Sea (Clausen and Rodgveller, 2010; Тuponogov and Novikov, 2016; Rodgveller, 2020).
First information available in the literautre on biology and ecology of the giant grenadier inhabiting the Bering Sea appeared after the Bering Sea expedition in 1962 (Kaganovsky, 1965; Novikov, 1970, 1974). Later, a range of authors supplemented the research study outcomes for biology of the grenadier from the Bering Sea (Тuponogov and Kurennoy, 1986; Тuponogov, 1991, 2001; Orlov, 2003; Tuponogov et al., 2008; Orlov et al., 2007, 2012; Orlov and Tokranov, 2008, 2019; Тuponogov and Novikov, 2016). Considering the assignment of the greanadier to the longest-living species (Novikov, 1970, 1974; Тuponogov, 1991; Burton, 1999; Hutchinson and Anderl, 2012), the data for 1963–2020, used in this survey, can allow us to understand some aspects of its life cycle and distribution more completely.
The objectives of the research survey are to summarize the long-term data and to analyse the new data on the spatial distribution and the life cycle specificity of the giant grenadier inhabiting the Northwest Bering Sea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The survey was conducted based on the sampled material collected in the marine research and fishing expeditions undertaken by the All-Russia Research Institute of Fishery and Oceanography, Pacific Branch (TINRO) in the Bering Sea in 1963–2020. The data on 37 000 catches performed with the bottom and multi-depth trawls at depths of between 0–1200 m were processed (Figs. 1, 2). The information on the species size composition, sex ratio, and life cycle is provided for the Northwest Bering Sea, where the most catches were performed. The data on the sex ratio and sexual maturity in the giant grenadier are provided based on the sampled fish measurements and dissection of > 55 thousand specimens. The fish total length (TL) from the snout tip to the caudal-fin ray tip was measured.
The gonad maturity stages were determined with the microscopy techniques according to a scale based on a range of visually different traits including the species size, body shape, color, elasticity, vascular development, and egg shape (Аlekseev and Alekseeva, 1996). In order to provide the verified data by dating the sexual maturity onset, all the females of >85 cm TL with gonads at maturity stage II and all the specimens with gonads at maturity stage VI–IIIa were combined with the females with gonads at maturity stage IIIa.
The produced data on captures were converted into the standard comparable values for distribution density in specimens/km2 with the Volvenko method (1998). It was made with formula: \(\frac{N}{A}\frac{p}{k} = \frac{{Np}}{{1.825{v}t \times 0.001ak}},\) where N—fish number per capture, specimens, A—area trawled, km2, t—duration of trawling, h; v—trawling speed, miles/h, 1.825—coefficient for conversion from miles to kilometers, а—horizontal trawl mouth opening, m, p—ratio of trawled hydrobiont stock height to vertical trawl opening (the p-value was taken equal to 1, cause of unavailable acoustic data for the target species and information on vertical trawl opening for certain trawl operations), and k—capture rate coefficient (k = 0.5 for the giant grenadier (Shuntov et al., 2006)).
Software Surfer v. 13.0.383 (Golden Software, USA) was used to build the map charts for the species distribution and occurrence. Diagrams showing the dinamics of male and female seasonal distribution in the water column were based on the depth-weighted average estimated as the sum of multiplication products of species densities (specimens/km2) and depths of trawling, assigned to the number of all the specimens sampled for research survey during a certain month. The depth-weighted average gives an idea about the maximum captures at certain depths for any given month within the indicated depth range. Ratios between the specimens with gonads at different maturity stages were estimated for each month throughout the range of water depth over the whole survey period. The graphs are created with the Python 3.0 (Python Software Foundation, USA) and the Matplotlib.
RESULTS
Giant grenadier distribution by different age groups. The giant grenadier is spread in the Bering Sea off the Commander and Aleutian Islands in the south toward Cape Navarin in the North. The largest aggregations of this species fish were found in the water areas over the Aleutian and Commander depression areas at the base of the continental shelf break and along the submarine Shirshov Ridge separating the Aleutian and Commander basins (Fig. 3a). The giant grenadier can be found in waters at depths from 99 m to the deepest layer of the explored depth zones within the surveys. Thus, the highest-density aggregations characterized by the median densities varying between 1800 and 2200 specimens/km2 are formed in the water layers at depths of between 500–1200 m along the continental slope. The fewer giant grenadier fish, which do not form any aggregations, can be found in the meso-bathypelagic zones at 140 to 1000 m depths of the water masses across the indicated depessions above the depths of between 500–4000 m (Fig. 3b).
The fish larvae of ≤10.0 cm TL were recorded occasionally in the Central and Northwest Bering Sea (Fig. 4), in the bathypelagic zone at depths of between 160–300 m (Fig. 4d). Low frequencies of occurrence of such specimens are caused by the low capture rate coefficient and, probably, the complete destruction of soft tissues of juvenile fish caught by trawl gears.
The juvenile fish of a larger size (10.1–20.0 cm TL) are also found occasionally in captures, however, more frequently at a larger depth range (250–800 m), sometimes, occurring over the continental shelf break or, probably, caught in trawl samples or arrangements (Fig. 4d). These specimens are widely spread across the sea area (Fig. 4a).
The specimens of 20.1–30.0 cm TL are recorded more frequently and in larger numbers in the multi-depth trawl captures within the depth range similar to depths for inhabiting the specimens of 10.1–20.0 cm TL (Fig. 4d). They occur mainly in the water masses over the Commander and Aleutian depressions, which do not appear to form dense aggregations (Fig. 4a). Most juvenile fish are recorded at the depths of between 300–500 m. However, it should be noted that a white dot caused by the missing data on the juvenile density at 500–800 m water depths in the survey is observed (Fig. 1). Most specimens of 30.1–40.0 cm TL leave the water masses for the bottom layers over the continental slope to inhabit within a narrow water-depth range (500–800 m), while small numbers of them may be found in the mesopelagic zone (Figs. 4b, 4e).
The giant grenadier of >40 cm TL is distributed mainly in the bottom water layers above the continental shelf break followed by the Commander and Aleutian depressions and along the Shirshov Ridge at the depth range of 300 m to the maximum water depth achieved in the survey. The specimens of this size group tend to aggregate generally in the water masses along the continental slope. Such aggregations may vary in density from 1 to 2500 specimens/km2, while the density of specimens of this size group across the bathypelagic zone above >1500 m depth is no more than 25 specimens/km2 (Figs. 4c, 4f)
Dynamics of variation in gonadal maturation in a population portion of sexually mature fish. It has been shown above that the specimens of >40 cm TL transit to the bottom water lifestyle along the continental slope to reach sexual maturity correlated with growth. Thus, males and females reach sexual maturity at 65–70 and 70–80 cm in length, respectively (Fig. 5). Fig. 6a shows size composition of a population proportion of sexually mature fish.
The percentage of female fish caught by bottom trawling along the continental slope sea floor is higher, at ratio 91 : 9 (Fig. 6b). In addition, the percentage ratio of males to females with gonads at maturity satge V comprises 35 : 65 (Fig. 6c).
The datasets over the total period of observations were monthly analyzed in order to understand thoroughly the spatial-temporal patterns of fattening and spawning in the population proportion of the sexually mature giant grenadier fish (Table 1, Fig. 7).
In the winter season, there are few giant grenadier specimens with gonads at maturity stage V. With respect to the female fish, the proportion of female specimens with gonads at maturity stages II and IIIa is larger, while there is small numbers of females with gonads at maturity stages IIIb and IV. The male fish with gonads at maturity stages III and IV were generally recorded. The sex ratio of fish specimens at the explored depths is biased toward females (Table 1, Fig. 7).
In the spring season, the females were dominant in catches at the average depth above 700 m (Fig. 7). However, if the female specimens with gonads at maturity stages II and IIIa were dominant in March, an increase in the female specimens with gonads at maturity stages IV, V, and VI can be observed in April and May. Thus, an increase in the number of females with gonads at maturity stage V may be associated with increasing the depth of trawling (Table 1). The number of male fish with gonads at maturity stage V also tends to increase from March to May with increasing the depth of trawling. Howerver, it is most likely associated with the first increased spawning activity in April–May. The male-to-female ratio is biased toward the males with increasing the depths of trawl operations, while the sex ratio between the specimens with gonads at maturity stage V remains at the same level.
In the summer season, any significant variations in ratios for specimens with gonads at different maturity stages are not observed, excluding a large proportion of males with gonads at maturity stage VI in June (Table 1), which tends to reduce throughout the summer months, exept August, when it slightly increases.
In the early autumn season (September), a proportion of the giant grenadier females ready to spawn with gonads at maturity stage V can reach 10–14%, while the proportion of females with gonads at maturity stage IV reduces at the reference sharp rise in the proportion of females with gonads at maturity stage VI (Table 1). With respect to the male fish, the proportion of male specimens ready to spawn with gonads at maturity stage V reaches 30–45%, despite a reduction in the total number of males in catches, which is associated with decreasing the depths of trawl surveys. The overall sex ratio between the giant grenadier males and females remains the same, while the sex ratios between the specimens with gonads at maturity stage V vary from month to month in this period. Thus, a proportin of females with gonads at this maturity stage is higher than that in the males in September–October (Fig. 7).
Spawning. The giant grenadier specimens with gonads at maturity stage V were recorded in catches throughout the year, excluding January and November, since the surveys were conducted no deeper than 700–750 m in these months. Therefore, this fact and an insignificant number of trawl operations cannot provide the opportunity to assess the spawning times and depths accurately. The male and female fish with gonads at maturity stage V were found at depths of between 600–1140 m. The proportion of females with gonads at maturity stage V comprises approximately ~1% throughout the year, tending to increase in the spring (May) and autumn (September) seasons to 9 and 14%, respectively. The males with gonads at maturity stage V can be also found thoughout the year. The proportion of such males is highest from April to October, comprising 24–77% (42%, on average), while the proportion in the winter season is lowest (Table 1). The sex ratio between the male and female fish with gonads at maturity stage V from February to August is biased toward males. Their proportion comprises 76%, on average. However, the proportions of spawning female fish in the autumn spawning activity intensified in September and October are higher than that in males, comprising 78 and 58% vs. 22 and 42%, respectively (Fig. 7).
DISCUSSION
Dustribution. The giant grenadier at different ontogenetic stages occupies different ecological niches within the entire Bering Sea from the Commander and Aleutian Islands in the south toward Cape Navarin in the north. The fertilized eggs of the giant grenadier are found in the water column above >400 m depth. It was shown with the deep-water survey extending from the Pasific side off the Kamchatka Peninsula to the Japanese Archipelago in 1976, the pollack surveys over the deepest parts of the Bering Sea and the Sea of Okhotsk (Tuponogov, 1991, 1997), and the Avacha Galf survey conducted lately (Buslov et al., 2006). The eggs are probably spread by the currents. In the observations published by Musienko as far back as 1963 and 1970 and Kashkina in 1965, they noted that the giant grenadier eggs, larvae of 14–18 TL, and juveniles were caught as every single specimen in the water masses above the depths of between 1000–3000 in the South Bering Sea off the Commander and Aleutian Islands. After hatching, the giant grenadier larvae and juvenile fish of <40 cm TL live the meso-bathypelagic lifestyle, spreading above the deepwater sea regions at the depth between 180 and 800 m, while most of them prefer the depths between 300 and 500 m, which do not appear to form any dense aggregations. Thus, the giant greanadier eggs and juveniles were previously found above the deep-water masses in the Avacha Gulf and above >400 m depth (Buslov et al., 2006; Saushkina, 2022). The species juvenil fish were recorded at the depths above 500 m in the Bering Sea (Novikov 1970, 1974; Аlferov, 2022; Alferov, 2022). With respect to the other sea regions, the species larvae were captured in the deepwater region of the Sea of Okhotsk (Tuponogov, 1991, 1997) and in the water masses at 530 m depth off the east coast of the Hokkaido Island (Endo et al., 2010). The giant grenadier juveniles may be carried by currents toward the shallow-water zones (Busby, 2005; Buslov et al., 2006). In addition, this pattern for juvenile fish distribution across the water masses is also typical for the other species of the family Macrouridae (Fukui and Tsuchiya, 2005).
The giant greandier fish reaching >40 cm TL start moving down toward the bottom layers. It was previously considered that settling on the bottom happens only after reaching 50–56 cm TL (Novikov 1970, 1974). The data based on the surveys show that later, the sexually mature specimens at a greater body length live the bottom lifestyle at depths in the range of 300 m to the maximum water depth achieved in the survey (1200 m) predominantly above the continental shelf break followed by the Commander and Aleutian depressions and along the Shirshov Ridge. These survey-based data meet the information on the depth range of 150–3500 m, indicated by the other researchers (Tuponogov, 1991, 2001; Orlov et al., 2012; Tuponogov and Kodolov, 2014; Tuponogov and Novikov, 2016). In the bottom water layer at the depths of between 500–4000 m, this species fish form the densiest aggregations, which median values vary from 1800 to 2200 specimens/ km2. In the water massess above the depths of between 500–4000 m, the giant grenadier can be found in the depth range of 140–1000 m in smaller numbers, which do not appear to form dense aggregations. The aggregation dense in the water masses over the continental slope may vary from 1 to 2500 specimens/km2, while the aggregation density of fish of >40 cm TL is not greater than 25 specimens/km2 in the bathypelagic zone over >1500 m depth. Thus, the similar results were previosly obtained (Shatunov et al., 2006). In addition, similar vertical migrations are typical of some other species of greandier fish at different stage of life cycle (Bergstad, 1990; D’Onghia et al., 2000).
Sex ratios. Comparing the weighted average depths of occurrence of the giant grenadier males and females, it becomes evident that femles are recorded in catches of bottom trawling at the water depths less than that for the male fish (Table 1). At the weighted average depths of less than 700 m below, the number of females is always larger than the male number. Their percentage ratio comprises approximately ~90 : 10. In addition, similar results were previously obtained based on the lower amount of data (Novikov, 1974; Tuponogov, 1991, 2001; Tuponogov et al., 2008; Orlov and Tokranov, 2008; Datsky, 2017). The dominance rate of females observed in the catches may be associated with the fact that males and females occupy different ecological niches (bathymetric ranges) in the deepwater habitat environments, which are only partiallly overlapped. In this context, the main habitats of the giant grenadier males probably occur at a range of depths down from 800 m, locating in the zone little accessable for bottom trawling, which is clearly shown with the example in May, when the proportion of males increased at the reference weighted average depth of >900 m, comprising 34% (Fig. 7). In addition, the other researchers (Novikov, 1970, 1974; Tuponogov, 1991) described the trend of increasing the proportion of males at the depths of >700–800 m. Moreover, the trend of increasing the male proportion with increasing the water depth probably remains across the habitats at a certain depth range, while the numerical superiority of males over spawning females can cause the occurrence of sexual competition. A similar pattern for a long-term presence of male fish on spawning grounds is typical of the pollack Gadus chalcogrammus (Shuntov et al., 1993; Fadeev and Ovsyznnikov, 2001) and the capelin Mallotus villosus (Velikanov, 2018).
The models for populations with such imbalanced sex ratios biased toward multiple males are typical of the roughhead grenadier Macrourus berglax, for instance, or the other species of grenadiers (Bergstad, 1990; D’Onghia et al., 2000).
Size composition. The giant grenadier males and females look slightly different from each other. However, sexually mature specimens of this species are different in the body size at the same age. Thus, the total length of males from the bottom trawls varies from 55 to 120 cm. The specimens of 75–90 cm TL represent the model group. Female fish is larger, comprising 50–180 cm TL, while the specimens of 80–105 cm TL are included into the model group. The survey-based datasets meet the statistics on ranges and maximum lengths previously indicated by Novikov (1970) and Tuponogov (1991, 2001) recording them up to 122 and 210 cm, respectively. Males and females reach sexual maturity at 65–70 and 70–80 cm TL, respectively, while Tuponogov (1991) indicated the female length-at-maturity of ~ 75 cm at which 50% of specimens reach sexual maturity.
Maturation. The maturing giant grenadier females and males use different habitats. Thus, the giant greandier females with gonads at early maturity stages (II and IIIa) can be found in catches throughout the year at the weighted average depth less than 650 m. Their proportion in the total number of females comprises 32–73%, while it tends to reduce with increasing the depth, which is probably caused by the fact that water massess at the depths of between 300–700 m along the continental slope provide habitats necessary for most female fish fattening. The proportion of females with gonads at maturity stage IIIb reaches the maximum values in catches from November to August (14–27%), while the minimum values are recorded in September, the period of spawning activities (up to 9%). The females with gonads at maturity stage IV can be found throughout the year. Their proportion comprises 14%, on average.
The proportion of males with gonads at maturity stages II and III is affected by significant variations from months to months, which is probably associated with variations in the explored depths in the surveys and statistical errors because of small sample sizes. The proportions of males with gonads in spawning (~32%, on average, at maturity stage V) and prespawning (~32% also, on average, at maturity stage IV) phases remain stable at high levels throughout the year. It should be noted that it is rather difficult to determine the male gonad maturity stage, since the morphological changes in testicular development are less exhibited than that in ovaries.
Spawning. Opinions of various researchers toward spawning dates between the giant grenadier populations are not equal. For instance, Novikov (1970, 1974) has indicated that spawning occurs throughout the year with increasing activity in the autumn–winter season. Tuponogov (1991) has later indicated that spawning takes place throughout the year, while its activity tends to increase in the spring–summer season. The other researchers refer to one or the other author’s concept (Buslov et al., 2006; Orlov, 2008; Datsky, 2017; Saushkina, 2022). In addition, the long-term period of spawning in the giant grenadier fish was also recorded in the East Bering Sea (Rodgveller et al., 2010).
CONCLUSIONS
The survey-based outcomes show that the giant grenadier spawning in the Bering Sea takes place throughout the year within the bottom layer, with two periods of peak spawning activity in the second half of a spring season and from the late summer season to the first half of an autumn season. Insignificant proportion of females tends to spawn in winter and summer seasons (up to 3%). Spawning activity increases in the spring season (up to 11% of female). This information coincides well with the data on the eggs from the giant grenadier recorded in the catches from the ichthyoplankton sampling nets in the deepwater horizon in the Avacha Gulf from the third ten-day period in April (Buslov et al., 2006) and the autumn season (up tp 19% females), which corresponds to the observations performed by Novikov (1970). Most males are ready to spawn throughout the year (on average, 32% males per month). Therefore, the number of male fish ready to spawn is larger than the female number throughout the year, except September and October. Considering the trend of increasing the proportion of males with increasing the water depth to >800 m, it may be supposed that giant greanadier spawning may be observed at greater depths, where ~90% male fish unaccounted from trawl surveys inhabit and the other ~60% females probably spawn. In order to clarify this assumption, the first author provided this published study collects additional information from the onboard observers for longline fishing for the giant grenadier at depths of between 800–1800 m at present. This additonal material should be collected at every 100-m depth in the depth range indicated above.
After spawning is complete, the females with gonads at mature stages VI and VI–IIIa can be found throughout the year, with two periods of peak quantity in April–May and in late August to early October. It is proven by the periods of spawning activity in the second half of a spring season and from the late summer season to the first half of the autumn season. In addition, increases in proportions of males spawned in June, August–September, and December can also indirectly indicate two spawning-season peaks indicated above (Table 1). The extended spawning season is also typical of the other species of the family Macrouridae. Thus, the spawning period in the species C. rupestris (Bergstad, 1990) and M. berglax (Murua and Motos, 2000), inahabiting the Atlantic Ocean, is extended for approximately half a year.
REFERENCES
Alekseev, F.E. and Alekseeva, E.I., Opredelenie stadii zrelosti gonad i izuchenie polovykh tsiklov, plodovitosti, produktsii ikry i tempa polovogo sozrevaniya u morskikh promyslovykh ryb (Determination of the Stages of Maturity of Gonads and the Study of the Sexual Cycles, Fertility, Egg Production and the Pace of Sexual Maturation in Marine Commercial Fishes), Kaliningrad: Atlant. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 1996.
Alferov, A.I., The incidence of juveniles of the family Macrouridae in the Bering Sea in the period from 1963 to 2020, Tr. XI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Morskie issledovaniya i obrazovanie (MARESEDU)-2022” (Proc. XI Int. Sci.– Pract. Conf. “Marine research and education (MARESEDU)-2022”), Tver: PoliPRESS, 2022, vol. 3, pp. 295–301.
Alferov, A.I., Distribution of giant grenadier (Albatrossia pectoralis) at different stages of ontogenesis in the Bering Sea, in PICES-2022. Book of Abstract, Busan: PICES Secretariat, 2022, p. 137.
Bergstad, O.A., Distribution, population structure, growth and reproduction of the roundnose grenadier Coryphaenoides rupestris (Pisces: Macrouridae) in the deep waters of the Skagerrak, Mar. Biol., 1990, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313239
Burton, E.J., Radiometric age determination of the giant grenadier (Albatrossia pectoralis) using 210Pb : 226Ra disequilibria, M. Sci. Thesis, San Francisco: San Francisco St. Univ., 1999.
Busby, M.S., An unusual macrourid larva (Gadiformes) from San Juan Island, Washington, USA, Ichthyol. Res., 2005, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-004-0255-1
Buslov, A.V., Tepnin, O.B., and Dubinina, A.Yu., Spring ichthyoplankton in the area of deep-sea canyons of Avacha Bay (East Kamchatka), Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2006, vol. 144, pp. 226–246.
Clark, M.R. and Koslow, J.A., Impacts of fisheries on seamounts, Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries, and Conservation, Oxford: Blackwell Publ., 2007, pp. 413–441.
Clausen, D.M. and Rodgveller, C.J., Assessment of grenadier stocks in the Gulf of Alaska, eastern Bering Sea, and Aleutian Islands, Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands SAFE Reports. Appendix 1, Anchorage: NPFMC, 2010, pp. 1571–1620.
Datsky, A.V., Biological features of the common fish species in Olyutorsky-Navarin region and the adjacent waters of the Bering Sea: 2. Families Macrouridae, Clupeidae, and Osmeridae, J. Ichthyol., 2017, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945217010027
Devine, J.A., Watling, L., Cailliet, G., et al., Evaluation of potential sustainability of deep-sea fisheries for grenadiers (Macrouridae), J. Ichthyol., 2012, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945212100062
D’Onghia, G., Basanisi, M., and Tursi, A., Population structure, age and growth of macrourid fish from the upper slope of the Eastern–Central Mediterranean, J. Fish. Biol., 2000, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1217–1238. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2000.1243
Endo, H., Nakayama, N., Suetsugu, K., and Miyake, H., A larva of Coryphaenoides pectoralis (Gadiformes: Macrouridae) collected by deep-sea submersible from off Hokkaido, Japan, Ichthyol. Res., 2010, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-010-0164-4
Fadeev, N.S. and Ovsyannikov, E.E., The distribution of pollock in the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk in the winter–spring period and the dynamics of spawning, Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2001, vol. 128, pp. 103–124.
Francis, R.I.C.C. and Clark, M.R., Sustainability issues for Orange Roughy Fisheries, Bull. Mar. Sci., 2005, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 337–351.
Fukui, A. and Tsuchiya, T., Pelagic larvae of Ventrifossa garmani (Gadiformes: Macrouridae) from Suruga Bay and offshore waters of Japan, Ichthyol. Res., 2005, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-005-0285-3
Hutchinson, C.E. and Anderl, D.M., Giant Grenadier (Albatrossia pectoralis) Age and Growth Research, Version 05/2023, Seattle: NOAA et al., 2012. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/alaska/sustainable-fisheries/giant-grenadier-albatrossia-pectoralis-age-and-growth-research.
Kaganovskii, L.G., Giant grenadier, in Bogatstva Beringova morya: promyslovye ryby materikovogo sklona, ikh lov i obrabotka (Resources of the Bering Sea: Commercial Fishes of the Mainland Slope, Their Fishing and Processing), Vladivostok: Dal’nevost. Kn. Izd., 1965, pp. 55–58.
Kashkina, A.A., Winter ichthyoplankton of the Commander Islands, Tr. VNIRO, 1965, vol. 58, pp. 179–188.
Murua, H., Motos, L., and Båmstedt, U., Reproductive biology of roughhead grenadier (Macrourus berglax Lacepede, 1801) (Pisces, Macrouridae), in northwest Atlantic waters, Sarsia, 2000, vol. 85, nos. 5–6, pp. 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00364827.2000.10414590
Musienko, L.N., Ichthyplacton of the Bering Sea, Tr. VNIRO, 1963, vol. 48, pp. 239–269.
Musienko, L.N., Reproduction and development of fishes of the Bering Sea, Ibid., 1970, vol. 70, pp. 166–225.
Novikov, N.P., Biology of the giant grenadier Chalinura pectoralis in the northern part of the Pacific, Ibid., 1970, vol. 70, pp. 300–326.
Novikov, N.P., Promyslovye ryby materikovogo sklona severnoi chasti Tikhogo okeana (Commercial Fishes of the Mainland Slope of the Northern Pacific Ocean), Moscow Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1974.
Orlov, A.M., Ichthyocenes of the lower shelf and upper bathyal of the Pacific waters of the northern Kuril Islands and the southeastern coast of Kamchatka, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, VNIRO, Moscow, 2003.
Orlov, A.M., Symposium “Grenadiers of the World Ocean: Biology, Evaluation of Reserves and Fishing,” Rybn. Khoz., 2007, no. 4, pp. 55–57.
Orlov, A.M. and Tokranov, A.M., Some ecological and biological features of giant and popeye grenadiers in the Pacific waters off the northern Kuril Islands and southeastern Kamchatka, in Grenadiers of the World Oceans: Biology, Stock Assessment, and Fisheries, Bethesda: Am. Fish. Soc., 2008, pp. 225–260. https://doi.org/10.47886/9781934874004.ch16
Orlov, A.M. and Tokranov, A.M., Checklist of deep-sea fishes of the Russian northwestern Pacific Ocean found at depths below 1000 m, Prog. Oceanogr., 2019, vol. 176, Article 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102143
Orlov, A.M., Antonov, N.P., and Afanasiev, P.K., Giant grenadier Albatrossia pectoralis in the catches of the deepwater fishing traps in Russian Far-Eastern waters, J. Ichthyol., 2012, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945212100037
Orlov, A.M., Abramov, A.A., and Tokranov, A.M., Some features of the biology of the giant Albatrossia pectoralis and the popeye Coryphaenoides cinereus grenadiers in the Pacific waters of the northern Kuril Islands and Southeastern Kamchatka, Dokl. VII Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. “Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya Kamchatki i prilegayushchikh morei” (Rep. VII Int. Sci. Conf. “Preservation of the Biodiversity of Kamchatka and Adjacent Seas”), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii: Kamchatpress, 2007, pp. 120–148.
Pitcher, T.J., Clark, M.R., Morato, T., and Watson, R., Seamount fisheries: Do they have a future?, Oceanography, 2010, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 134–144. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2010.66
Rodgveller, C.J., Assessment of the grenadier stock complex in the Gulf of Alaska, Eastern Bering Sea, and Aleutian Islands, Aleutian Islands SAFE Reports. Appendix 1, Anchorage: NPFMC, 2020, pp. 1571–1620.
Rodgveller, C.J., Clausen, D.M., Nagler, J.J., and Hutchinson, C., Reproductive characteristics and mortality of female giant grenadiers in the northern pacific ocean, Mar. Coast. Fish., 2010, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1577/C09-028.1
Saushkina, D.Ya., Records of the capture of juveniles of grenadiers (Gadiformes: Macrouridae) in Pacific Waters of Kamchatka in 2006–2018, Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2022, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074022050194
Savvatimsky, P.I., Age structure of roughhead grenadier (Macrourus berglax) in the Northwest Atlantic, 1985, NAFO Sci. Coun. Stud., 1994, vol. 20, pp. 53–64.
Shuntov, V.P., Volkov, A.F., Temnykh, O.S., and Dulepova, E.P., Mintai v ekosistemakh dal’nevostochnykh morei (Pollock in the Ecosystems of the Far Eastern Seas), Vladivostok: Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 1993.
Shuntov, V.P., Bocharov, L.N., Volvenko, I.V., et al., Atlas kolichestvennogo raspredeleniya nektona v zapadnoi chasti Beringova morya (Atlas of the Quantitative Distribution of Nekton in the Western Part of the Bering Sea), Moscow: Nats. Rybn. Resur., 2006.
Tuponogov, V.N., Orlov, A.M., and Kodolov, L.S., The most abundant grenadiers of the Russian Far East eez: Distribution and basic biological patterns, in Grenadiers of the World Oceans: Biology, Stock Assessment, and Fisheries, Bethesda: Am. Fish. Soc., 2008, pp. 285–316.
Tuponogov, V.N., Ecology of the giant grenadier, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Pacific Sci. Res. Inst. Fishery Oceanogr., Vladivostok, 1991.
Tuponogov, V.N., Seasonal migrations of the giant grenadier Coryphaenoides pectoralis in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters, Biol. Morya, 1997, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 362–369.
Tuponogov, V.N., Grenadiers, in Gidrometeorologiya i gidrokhimiya morei, T. X: Beringovo more, Vyp. 2: Gidrokhimicheskie usloviya i okeanologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya biologicheskoi produktivnosti (Hydrometeorology and Hydrochemistry of the Seas, vol. X: Bering Sea, no. 2: Hydrochemical Conditions and Oceanological Foundations of the Formation of Biological Productivity), St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 2001, pp. 149–155.
Tuponogov, V.N., Current state of deep-sea fish resources of the Far Eastern seas and the surrounding water of the Pacific Ocean: Reserves, fishing, fishing prospects, Rybn. Khoz., 2018, no. 4, pp. 48–55.
Tuponogov, V.N. and Kurennoi, A.A., Giant grenadier, in Biologicheskie resursy Tikhogo okeana (Biological Resources of the Pacific Ocean), Moscow: Nauka, 1986, pp. 233–241.
Tuponogov, V.N. and Kodolov, L.S., Polevoi opredelitel’ promyslovykh i massovykh vidov ryb dal’nevostochnykh morei Rossii (Field Guide of the Commercial and Mass Fish Species of the Far Eastern Seas of Russia), Vladivostok: Russ. Ostrov, 2014.
Tuponogov, V.N. and Novikov, N.P., Grenadiers—an important reserve of deep-sea fishery in the Far Eastern seas, Rybn. Khoz., 2016, no. 6, pp. 54–60.
Velikanov, A.Ya., Far Eastern capelin: Distribution, biology features, biomass dynamics, problems and prospects of commercial development, Vopr. Rybolovstva, 2018, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 300–326.
Vinnichenko, V.I., Orlov, A.M., and Shamrai, E.A., Problems of deep-sea fishery in the Northeastern Atlantic, Tr. VNIRO, 2005, vol. 145, pp. 43–54.
Volvenko, I.V., Problems of quantitative assessment of the abundance of fish according to trawl surveys, Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 1998, vol. 124, pp. 473–500.
Watling, L., Haedrich, R.L., Devine, J., et al., Theoretically, all deep-sea fisheries could have been conducted sustainably, in Can Ecosystem-Based Deep-Sea Fishing Be Sustained?, Walpole: Univ. Maine et al., 2011.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to A.M. Orlov (Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences) and I.V. Melnikov (TINRO) for their valuable comments and proposals, which allowed us to improve the quality of the research publication. The authors also express their gratitude to all the TINRO colleagues for their assistance in systematic collecting the information to consider when running the expeditions.
Funding
This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or manage this particular research were obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. No approval of the Research Ethics Committee was required, since the most data were collected during commercial fishing trips and research expeditions, where the analyses were conducted in accordance with the international standards.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by O. Zhiryakova
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Alferof, A.I., Kurnosov, D.S. Life Cycle Characteristics and Distribution of Giant Grenadier Coryphaenoides pectoralis (Macrouridae) in Northwest Bering Sea. J. Ichthyol. 64, 304–316 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945224020012
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945224020012