Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between the biomass and production of bacterio- and phytoplanktonic communities

  • Experimental Articles
  • Published:
Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative ratios of the biomasses of bacterio- and phytoplankton, interrelation of their production characteristics, and association of the functional characteristics with environmental factors were studied for Lake Khanka, the Yenisei River, and the Krasnoyarsk Reservoir. The ratio between the biomasses of bacterioplankton (Bb) and phytoplankton (Bp) in these water bodies was shown to vary within the range exceeding three orders of magnitude. Bacterioplankton biomass was relatively stable and varied from sample to sample by an order of magnitude. In more than 50% of the samples (total sample number, 495), bacterioplankton biomass exceeded that of the phytoplankton. The average Bb/Bp ratios for Lake Khanka, Yenisei River, and Krasnoyarsk Reservoir were 5.1, 2, and 1.4, respectively. Increased Bb/Bp ratios were found to correlate with elevated specific (per unit biomass) phytoplankton production. This finding indicated additional supply of biogenic elements to phytoplankton due to their recycling by bacterial communities. The ratio between bacterioplankton and phytoplankton production for Lake Khanka varied from year to year (0.07 to 0.76). For the Yenisei River and the Krasnoyarsk Reservoir these ratios were on average 0.19 and 0.27, respectively. According to the literature data for other water bodies, bacterial production may reach from 10 to over 100% of the primary production. The equilibrium density of bacterioplankton (maximal density of the population) in Lake Khanka was ~1.5 times higher than in the Yenisei River and the Krasnoyarsk Reservoir due to higher content of suspended mineral matter and associated organo-mineral detritus in the lake. The interaction between dissolved organic compounds sorbed on the surface of mineral particles results in chemical alteration of biochemically stable substrate into compounds which may be assimilated by aquatic microorganisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlgren, I.G., Limnological studies of Lake Norrviken, a eutrophicated Swedish lake. II. Phytoplankton and its production, Schweiz Z. Hydrol., 1970, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 354–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Sáez, L., Vázquez-Domínguez, E., Cardelús, C., Pinhassi, J., Sala, M.M., Lekunberri, I., Balagué, V., Maria-Costa, M., Unrein, F., Massana, R., Simó, R., and Gasol, J.M., Factors controlling the seasonality of bacterial carbon use in NWmediterranean coastal waters, Ecosystems, 2008, vol. 11, pp. 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.S. and Dokulil, M., Assessments of primary and bacterial production in three large mountain lakes in Alberta, western Canada, Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol., 1977, vol. 62, pp. 97–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aponasenko, A.D., Lopatin, V.N., Filimonov, V.S., and Shchur, L.A., Studies of the structure of aquatic ecosystems based on the suspension-water phase boundary, Siberian J. Ecol., 1996, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aponasenko, A.D., Lopatin, V.N., Filimonov, V.S., and Shchur, L.A., Some prospects of using contact optical methods for studying water ecosystems, Izv. Atmosph. Ocean. Phys., 1998, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aponasenko, A.D., Shchur, L.A., and Lopatin, V.N., Relationship of the chlorophyll content with the biomass and disperse structure of phytoplankton, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2007, vol. 412, no. 1, pp. 61–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, E.R. and Sutcliffe, W.H., Dissolved organic matter in sea water as a source of particulate food, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1963, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 369–371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bindloss, M.E., Primary productivity of phytoplankton in Loch Leven, Kinross, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh. B., 1974, vol. 74, pp. 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D.F. and Kalff, J., Empirical relationships between bacterial abundance and chlorophyll concentration in fresh and marine waters, Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 1984, vol. 41, pp. 1015–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bul’on, V.V., Extracellular phytoplankton production and methods of its study, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1988, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bul’on, V.V., Nikulina, V.P., Pavel’eva, E.B., Stepanova, L.A., and Khlebovich, T.V., Microbial “loop” in the trophuc network of lake palnkton, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1999, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaikovskaya, T.S., Phytoplankton of Enisey River and Krasnoyarsk Reservoir, in Biologicheskie issledovaniya Krasnoyarskogo vodokhranilishcha (Biological Investigation of the Krasnoyarsk Reservoir), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1975, pp. 43–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.J., Interaction between bacteria and algae in aquatic ecosystems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1982, vol. 13, pp. 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M.L., Bacterial production in fresh and saltwater ecosystems: a cross overview, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 1988, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabkova, V.G., Zonal’noe izmenenie intensivnosti mikrobiologicheskikh protsessov v ozerakh (Zonal Variations in the Rate of Microbial Processes in Lakes), Leningrad: Nauka, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gak, D.Z., Bakterioplankton i ego rolv biologicheskoi produktinosti vodokhranilishch (Bacterioplankton and Its Role in Biological Productivity of Reservoirs), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Olapade, O.A., Kershner, M.W., and Leff, L.G., Algal-bakterial co-variation in streams: a cross-stream comparison, Arch. Hydrobiol., 2004, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutel’makher, B.L., Metabolizm planktona kak edinogo tselogo: Trofometabolicheskie vzaimodeistviya zoo-ifitoplanktona (Metabolism of Plankton as a Coherent Whole: Trophic and Metabolic Interactions of Zoo- and Phytoplankton), Leningrad: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, S.I. and Dubinina, G.A., Metody izucheniya vodnykh mikroorganizmov (Methods for Studying Aquatic Microorganisms), Moscow: Nauka, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, O.T., Chrzanowski, T.H., and Dávalos-Lind, L., Clay turbidity and the relative production of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton, Hydrobiologia, 1997, vol. 353, pp. 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jugnia, L.-B., Sime-Ngando, T., and Devaux, J., Relationship between bacterial and primary production in a newly filled reservoir: temporal variability over 2 consecutive years, Ecol. Res., 2007, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metodika izucheniya biogeotsenozov vnutrennikh vodoemov (Methods for Studying Biogeocenoses of Internal Water Bodies), Mordukhai-Boltovskii, F.D., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metody fiziologo-biokhimicheskogo issledovaniya vodoroslei v gidrobiologicheskoi praktike (Methods for Physiological and Biochemical Investigation of Algae in Hydrobiological Practice), Topachevskii, A.V., Ed., Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikheeva, T.M., Phytoplankton of Lake Drivyaty, in Biologicheskaya produktivnost’ evtrofnogo ozera (Biological Production of an Eutrophic Lake), Moscow: Nauka, 1970, pp. 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory, P., Palesse, S., Delmas, D., and Montanié, H., In situ structuring of virioplankton through bacterial exoenzymatic activity: interaction with phytoplankton, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 2011, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovskii, I.S. and Tifenbakh, O.I., Dynamics of abundance, specific production, and bacterial generation time, in Struktura i funktsionirovanie soobshchestv vodnykh mikroorganizmov (Structure and Functioning of Aquatic Microbial Communities), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986, pp. 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, M.L., Heterotrophic microbial processes, in The Trophic Cascade in Lake, Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1993, pp. 252–277.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R., Evolutionary Ecology, New York: Harper & Row, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifonova, I.S., Ekologiya i suktsessiya ozernogo fitolanktona (Ecologyn and Succession of Lake Phytoplankton), Leningrad: Nauka, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg, G.G., Alimov, A.F., Bul’on, V.V. et al., Biological productivity of two subarctic lakes, in Produktsionno-biologicheskie issledovaniya ekosistem presnykh vod (Production Biology Studies of Freshwater Ecosystems), Minsk: Belarus. Gos. Univ., 1973, pp. 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P.A., Kalff, J., and Rasmssen, J.B., The effect of temperature and algal biomass on bacterial production and specific growth rate in freshwater and marine habitats, Microb. Ecol., 1991, vol. 21, pp. 99–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, C., Bouvier, T., Weinbauer, M.G., and Thingstad, T.F., Trade-offs between competition and defense specialists among unicellular planktonic organisms: the “Killing the Winner” hypothesis revisited, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 2010, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 42–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. Aponasenko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.D. Aponasenko, L.A. Shchur, 2016, published in Mikrobiologiya, 2016, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 211–218.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aponasenko, A.D., Shchur, L.A. Relationships between the biomass and production of bacterio- and phytoplanktonic communities. Microbiology 85, 243–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261716020028

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261716020028

Keywords

Navigation