Abstract
DNA methylation plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Its deficits in the brain cause various neurological diseases, including autism, schizophrenia and mood disorders. The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a promising model organism in biomedicine. Given its high genetic and physiological homology with humans, studying genome methylation deficits in zebrafish can help elucidate the molecular processes underlying the etiology and pathogenesis of various neurological diseases, as well as develop novel therapies. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of DNA methylation in the brain and the diseases associated with its dysregulation in humans, as well as their genetic and pharmacological models in zebrafish. We also evaluate the limitations of zebrafish models and possible directions for further research in this field. Mounting evidence summarized here supports zebrafish as an effective model for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of brain pathologies associated with compromised DNA methylation.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation, is an essential process for normal organismal activity [1]. DNA methylation directly regulates gene expression, the function of regulatory elements and chromatin stability, also playing an important role in cell differentiation and tissue specialization during embryogenesis, including in the central nervous system (CNS, Fig. 1). DNA methylation in eukaryotes is implemented by a covalent transfer of a methyl group to the C-5 position of cytosine (C) in those DNA sites where it is followed by guanine (G), the so-called CpG sites, which occur with high frequency in genomic regions (CpG islands, CGIs) localized in the gene promoter region [1]. DNA methylation disorders, both its hyper- and hypomethylation, are associated with various CNS diseases, including autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression [1] (Table 1). However, the molecular mechanisms of DNA methylation and its role in the pathogenesis of these disorders remain poorly understood. Experimental animal models provide an important tool to explore pathological processes at different systemic levels, specifically, using highly translational model organisms, primarily rodents and primates.
Along with laboratory mammals, the zebrafish (Danio rerio), a small freshwater teleost fish, has gained popularity in recent years as an effective translational model system [2]. The wide application of zebrafish in neurobiological studies owes a handful of their biological features, including a close similarity of their CNS physiology to that of humans [2], rapid development (outside the maternal organism), high fecundity, transparency of their embryos, mammalian-like responses to pharmacological agents and ease of their administration to fish by immersion [3, 4]. Zebrafish are highly amenable to genetic manipulations, allowing creation of mutations that cause defects in various organ systems, recapitulating human pathologies [5]. To date, the zebrafish genome has been fully mapped and sequenced [6], revealing quite a high (~70%) genetic homology with humans [7]. More than 80% of human disease-related genes have at least one ortholog in zebrafish, 69% of which fall on linearly homologous genes [8], while among the orthologous genes, 47% have an unambiguous linkage to a zebrafish ortholog [5]. The presence of orthologs associated with human diseases provides the possibility to investigate key expression pathways of these genes and their downstream targets [9]. The constellation of these and other assets enables zebrafish to be used as an effective model for studying the role of DNA methylation in CNS functioning.
Fish genetic studies are somewhat complicated by an additional cycle of whole genome duplication compared to the rest of fishes [5]. As a result, zebrafish has 26206 coding genes, which is more than in any other vertebrate sequenced previously. The zebrafish genome contains more species-specific genes than in humans and mouse, which is also a consequence of duplication [10], while the duplicated genes encode potentially more diverse and zebrafish-specific proteins [11]. On the other hand, carrying out genetic modifications in these fish is by far easier and simpler than in rodents [12].
Modern genetics has got enough tools for editing the zebrafish genome, of which zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator effector-like nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), which allow inducing targeted mutagenesis, are of particular interest [13]. Currently, the application of such technologies has enabled engineering zebrafish genetic models with mutations characteristic of various CNS diseases. They include the models of Parkinson’s disease created by PINK1 gene knockout, peripheral neuropathy and dominant optic atrophy created by MFN2 and KIF5A gene knockouts, Leigh syndrome with a mutation in the COA6 gene, Dravet syndrome with a mutation in the SCN1A gene, Kosteff syndrome with a mutation in the OPA3 gene, and congenital myasthenic syndrome or severe combined DL-2 hydroxyglutaric aciduria with a mutation in the SLC25A1 gene [14]. Thus, zebrafish-based genetic models have been created and successfully used to study the molecular pathogenetic mechanisms of various human brain diseases, develop novel therapeutic approaches, and run preclinical trials.
Common control mechanisms of gene transcription via DNA methylation. The upper two diagrams show the pathways of gene silencing by blocking the interaction of transcription factors with the promoter or enhancer regions, respectively. Promoter methylation recruits an activating protein (AP), which prevents transcription factors from binding to the promoter sequence. The bottom diagram exemplifies the interaction of methyl-CpG-binding protein (MBP) with a region enriched with methylated CpG sites. After MBP binding to DNA, it recruits histone deacetylase (HDA) to trigger histone deacetylation, leading to chromatin condensation at the given site and promoter closing for binding transcription factors, hence to blocking gene transcription.
DNA METHYLATION AS A MECHANISM OF EPIGENETIC GENOME REGULATION
The role of epigenetic mechanisms in multicellular organisms is reduced to modulating gene expression profiles in cells and tissues [15]. The basic epigenetic processes include DNA methylation and demethylation, histone acetylation and deacetylation, as well as phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of transcription factors [16]. In contrast to acetylation (which facilitates the process of transcription), DNA methylation can both induce and inhibit gene transcription depending on the number of methyl groups attached (Figs. 1, 2). For example, the addition of one group attenuates electrostatic attraction between DNA and histones and thus enhances transcription, whereas the addition of 2–3 methyl groups entails DNA site blockade and gene repression [17].
The specific enzymes that catalyze, recognize, and remove DNA methylation are subdivided into several groups (Table 2). Writer enzymes catalyze the addition of methyl groups to cytosine residues, eraser enzymes modify or remove methyl groups, while reader enzymes recognize methyl groups and bind to them, thus influencing gene expression [18]. DNA methylation in eukaryotes is catalyzed by a family of DNA methyltransferases (Dnmts), which are writer enzymes. Three of them (Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b) are active during embryogenesis [17]. Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, known as de novo Dnmt, can establish a novel methylation pattern of unmodified DNA. In vivo experiments have shown the crucial role of Dnmt3b at early developmental stages and Dnmt3a for normal cell differentiation [17] (Figs. 1, 2).
Dnmt1 is one of the most well-studied enzymes of this family. It copies the DNA methylation pattern from the parental DNA strand onto the newly synthesized daughter strand, thus participating in DNA replication, and controls cell differentiation and division during embryogenesis [19]. Dnmt3L is expressed early in development and does not perform a catalytic function on its own, but binds to Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, stimulating their methyltransferase activity and altering the global RNA expression of genes involved in neuronal differentiation [20, 21]. Dnmt3L synthesis is suppressed during the latter process and is not observed in the postnatal human brain [22]. Dnmt expression diminishes by the time of terminal differentiation of most cells in embryogenesis, however, in the adult mammalian brain neurons continue expressing Dnmts, suggesting the importance of DNA methylation for brain performance throughout ontogenesis [23].
The class of reader enzymes includes MBDs (Table 1), ubiquitin-like proteins UHRF (see below), and proteins containing a Cys2His2 (C2H2)-like zinc finger motif. All of them share a high affinity for 5-methylcytosine and inhibit the binding of transcription factors [24]. MBD family proteins contain a conserved methyl-CpG-binding domain that provides a high affinity for single methylated CpG sites. Proteins in this family are expressed in the mammalian brain to a greater extent than in any other tissue and are required for normal neuronal development and functioning. This family includes MeCP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4. Besides their leading role in transcriptional repression, they are also involved in maintaining DNA methylation [24]. Ubiquitin-like proteins are represented by UHRF1 and UHRF2, multidomain proteins that bind to half-methylated DNA during S-phase and recruit DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 to regulate chromatin structure and gene expression [25]. The DNA methylation structure in the genome undergoes dynamic changes throughout embryonic development due to both its de novo methylation and demethylation.
Differentiated cells produce a stable and unique DNA methylation pattern that regulates tissue-specific gene transcription. At the same time, neuronal activity can modulate this pattern in response to physiological stimuli and environmental exposures and can be inherited [26]. For example, the differences in DNA methylation patterns (described in Mongolians traditionally leading a nomadic lifestyle) include hypomethylation of the promoter regions of the PM20D1 gene, which encodes a mitochondrial fission protein and is involved in cellular anti-ROS defense and thermoregulation [27].Mounting evidence also supports the important role of DNA methylation in brain functions. For example, in patients with Parkinson’s disease, the development of depressive symptoms is accompanied by changes in DNA methylation in nigral neurons [28]. However, there is a correlation between the improvement of some human cognitive skills during meditation and DNA methylation in SLC1A2 (encodes excitatory amino acid transporter 2, EAAT2, the main glutamate transporter), FBXO38 (ubiquitination and antitumor activity regulator), HMP19 (pancreatic cancer suppressor), PPP1R9A (encodes NRB1, a key protein involved in shaping synapses), and in some other genes encoding functionally different proteins in the brain [29].
A brief summary of the role of DNA methylation and demethylation in the regulation of neuronal functions. Native cytosine is methylated by three main methyltransferases, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, Dnmt3L, with Dnmt1 being responsible for maintaining continuous methylation. Passive demethylation is driven by various external factors. Аctive demethylation is catalyzed by TET-methylcytosine-dioxygenases (TETs) and thymine-DNA-glycosylase (TDG, see also Table 2).
ZEBRAFISH GENOME METHYLATION IN MODELING BRAIN DISORDERS
Zebrafish is a logical model for studying DNA methylation since the basic epigenetic mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved across all vertebrates [30] (Fig. 3). To date, there are data on the effect of DNA methylation on the development of zebrafish nervous system, myelination of oligodendrocytes, and differentiation of nerve cells during neural tube formation (e.g., morphine-induced decrease in DNA methylation and H3K27 hyperacetylation) [31]. DNA methylation also depends on neuroprotection, neuroplasticity (e.g., morphine-induced decrease in neurotrophin BDNF production), proliferation of neural precursors (e.g., due to dysfunction of lysine (K)-specific methyltransferase 2A, KMT2A, which maintains the expression of various genes), as well as tumorigenesis in the zebrafish CNS (e.g., due to compromised expression of the MYCN and ALK genes encoding the proto-oncogenic protein N-Myc and receptor tyrosine kinase, respectively) [31].
Zebrafish have also been used to study aberrant epigenetic mechanisms in offspring exposed to ethanol in embryogenesis [32], and to model anxiety-like behavior in fish exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [33]. Fetal valproate syndrome, a developmental disorder of the fetal nervous system, caused by exposing a fetus to the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium valproate, whose symptoms resemble autism and whose pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood, has also been successfully modeled in zebrafish. Specifically, the serotonergic deficit, characteristic of this syndrome, has been investigated and found to be associated with Ascl1 proneural gene silencing [34].
Zebrafish are actively used to study the role of DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of complex polygenic psychiatric disorders (for examples see Fig. 4). Since schizophrenia in humans is associated with a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subunit beta-2 (GABRB2) gene, the manifestation of schizophrenic symptoms (social isolation and cognitive dysfunction) in zebrafish is modeled by the administration of I-methionine (MET). Meanwhile, the level of DNA methylation in general and GABRB2 promoter in particular is significantly increased, recapitulating the pathological pattern observed post mortem in the brain tissue of patients with schizophrenia [35]. Zebrafish models of neurodegenerative diseases, such as pharmacological models of parkinsonism induced by 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+), have also been engineered [36], demonstrating the disruption of epigenetic mechanisms and a therapeutic efficacy of trans-2-phenylcyclopropylamine, an inhibitor of histone demethylation enzymes [37].
The group of AID/APOBEC polynucleotide cytidine deaminases is a family of proteins able to introduce mutations into DNA and RNA [38]. AID/APOBEC provide amine deamination to a carbonyl group and 5-methylcytosine conversion to thymine, which is one of the mechanisms of active demethylation. Modeling of the mechanism of action of the AID/APOBEC complex in zebrafish demonstrated that AID/APOBEC overexpression promotes DNA demethylation in fish, whereas its knockdown or knockout inhibit DNA demethylation of various genes required for cellular reprogramming and development [39, 40].
Effects of promoter methylation of selected marker genes on the development of CNS phenotypes in zebrafish. Hypermethylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene nr3c1 promoter alters its expression and, hence, normal functioning of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, evoking anxiety-like behavior in fish [58]. The lack of promoter methylation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (pparg) gene, a key transcription factor controlling the expression of many downstream genes involved in lipid transport, biogenesis and lipolysis, upregulates pparg expression, leading to rapid accumulation of ATP and abnormally increased locomotor activity in zebrafish larvae [59]. The glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1 (grin1) gene plays an important role in the pathogenesis of memory impairment. Nicotine-induced hypermethylation of its promoter in fish (and also in rats) suppresses grin1 expression, leading to memory deterioration in zebrafish [60].
PROSPECTIVE RESEARCH TRENDS
Importantly, brain cells, unlike other tissues, are able to change DNA methylation pattern during development, which is key for learning and memory processes. Therefore, disorders of DNA methylation mechanisms lead to impaired cognitive activity of the brain. CNS diseases associated with DNA methylation disorders (Table 1) include Rett syndrome (caused by mutated methyl-binding protein MeCP2 [41]) and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1, which develops into dementia and hearing loss in adulthood (due to autosomal dominant mutation in the Dnmt1 N-terminal regulatory domain sequence [42]). DNA methylation disorders are also associated with Martin-Bell or Fragile X-chromosome syndrome (resulting from abnormal methylation of a trinucleotide repeat in the FMR1 gene on the X chromosome), which is a common form of mental retardation [43], as well as Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes caused by erroneous DNA methylation of an imprinted allele and manifested as significant mental disorders [44]. Since incorrect expression or dysfunction of even a single gene entails significant perturbations in brain activity, the importance of understanding the mechanisms underlying the impact of DNA methylation on CNS gene expression cannot be overestimated.
As mentioned above, environmental factors impact epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation. For example, exposure to narcotic substances [45, 46], ethanol [47], and some drugs [48] can modulate DNA methylation. Stress is also such an environmental factor. For example, increased methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor promoter during neonatal stress in mice, leading to its under-expression, resembles similar changes in abused children [49], as well as in patients with schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder [50]. In this regard, studying pharmacogenic and stress-induced modulation of DNA methylation in the zebrafish brain appears to be an extremely exciting and promising research trend.
In general, zebrafish are valuable translational objects for modeling human genetic disorders, while being practically as good as rodents in their potential to reproduce mental disorders [51, 52]. Although epigenetic processes in zebrafish are still poorly understood, the use of these model objects for epigenomic studies, specifically, in terms of organism’s viability extension has a considerable potential. One of the pressing priorities is exploring epigenetic mechanisms in the development of the normal zebrafish brain, namely the processes of shaping the epigenome landscape and functional diversification of neurons, formation of neuronal networks and brain functions in general and in different periods of the organism’s life. Among the future directions is the development of technologies sensitive to all forms of cytosine, primarily to 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine [53], and the analysis of changes in cellular processes caused by their accumulation.
A separate area of research on the role of DNA methylation in zebrafish CNS relates to clarifying the influence of individual epigenetic factors on the organism’s formation. The perinatal period is known to be critical to normal brain development [54], so studies of DNA methylation and other epigenetic changes during this period, as well as their links to the subsequent pathogenesis of brain diseases are of particular importance. Although the canonical functions of DNA methylation are highly conserved, there is a wide range of DNA methylation levels and patterns in different animal species. Comparative analysis of DNA methylation patterns in vertebrates (specifically, in rodents and zebrafish) appears therefore promising, as the insight into these inter-taxa differences may help reveal new evolutionary aspects of CNS gene regulation.
A crucial aspect of studying the regulation of gene expression is the genome size. Zebrafish and rodents have significant differences in the amount of genetic information, which can influence gene diversity, location, and functional characteristics. A larger genome size may provide additional opportunities for evolution and diversity, whereas a smaller genome size may imply a more efficient organization of genetic information. The orchestration of genomic regions also plays a decisive role in cell functioning.
Zebrafish and rodents have differences in the structure of chromosomes, the arrangement of genes and other functional elements. They also exhibit differences in DNA methylation patterns, which may be reflected on the phenotype and specific biological processes. For example, a comparative DNA methylation profiling of brain cells in mice and zebrafish showed that on average 24% of CpGs were methylated in the mouse brain, while in zebrafish this index reached 70% [55]. These data confirm that DNA methylation is species specific. Furthermore, until recently, many DNA methylation studies focused on such genomic regions as CGIs and transcription start sites (TSSs), and only few recent studies assessed DNA methylation in other elements, such as intergenic regions and enhancers (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, a positive correlation between DNA demethylation at enhancers and the expression levels of nearby genes has been shown in zebrafish [56].
Due to high occurrence of intergenic regions in zebrafish genome, they also have a higher overall DNA methylation level than mice [55], which corresponds to the presence of a greater number of transposons in the intergenic regions of the zebrafish genome compared to mice. For example, given the genome size and the proportion of DNA repeats, transposons can account for up to 52% of the zebrafish genome and 45% of the mouse genome [57]. The understanding of the differences in gene regulation between zebrafish and rodents, including at the level of DNA methylation, may shed light on the molecular mechanisms underlying their biological differences, including the CNS, while further studies in this area may open up new avenues for the treatment and prevention of diseases associated with compromised CNS gene expression.
The analysis of sex differences in the zebrafish CNS [61] is another promising area of research in terms of the growing recognition of their role both in the functioning of the normal human brain and in its pathology [62], as well as the data on sex differences in DNA methylation in the human [63] and zebrafish [64] brain. Another important trend in zebrafish DNA methylation studies is concerned with analyzing the effects of various neurotropic drugs and toxins on gene expression of DNA methyltransferases and demethylases in the fish brain and the synthesis of the enzymes themselves, as well as evaluating their enzymatic activity. For example, arecoline, a natural psychoactive alkaloid with a partial agonism to nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, when administered chronically, exerts an anxiolytic effect on fish behavior against the background of increased gene expression in the brain. This suggests the involvement of epigenetic regulation in the long-term effects of arecoline via DNA methylation [65]. Thus, it is possible to identify at least several different DNA methylation-related mechanisms, due to which one or another neurotropic drug can exert its effect on the CNS (Table 3). Given the high throughput of zebrafish as a screening model, testing these drugs on zebrafish may lead to the identification of new classes of pharmacological agents that inhibit or enhance DNA methylation in the CNS.
It is traditionally believed that an increase in the methylation of CGIs at gene promoters leads to the suppression of gene expression, while a decrease in methylation, by contrast, evokes its enhancement. For example, an increase in CpG methylation at the promoter of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene correlates with the diminished BDNF synthesis in mouse neurons [66]. At the same time, for other genomic regions, there is no definite correlation with the level of DNA methylation and the direction of gene expression changes [67]. For example, various associations of DNA methylation with severe human depressive disorders occur in genomic regions beyond the promoter (e.g., overall hypomethylation of the synapsin gene (SYN2) in depression [68, 69]). Studies of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) using genome-wide sequencing with sodium bisulfide conversion of the placenta from mothers, whose children subsequently developed ASD, revealed a change in methylation of a previously uncharacterized non-coding region of the NHIP (Neuronal Hypoxia Inducible, Placenta Associated) RNA gene [70]. These data demonstrate that the link between DNA methylation and CNS developmental disorders is diverse and affects regions across the entire genome, but not only coding regions. In addition to blocking transcription factors during DNA methylation (Fig. 1), yet another mechanism of epigenetic regulation is based on the hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET demethylases (Fig. 2) [70, 71]. Currently, the differences between DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation are usually not accentuated, measuring both modifications indiscriminately. For this reason, in future DNA methylation studies [72] in the zebrafish brain, it is important to study these two processes, as well as their individual contributions to CNS modulation, separately. DNA methylation outside CpG regions occurs most frequently in mammalian neurons and glial cells (specifically, in mice and humans), representing a rare phenomenon in the frontal cortex of a human fetus, but significantly augmenting later in life against the background of synaptogenesis and increasing synaptic density [73]. DNA methylation at non-CGI regions may play an important role in the regulation of gene activity, and continue in the adult brain, acting similarly to CpG methylation when repressing transcription [74]. For example, binding of the classical MBP MeCP2 to unmethylated DNA sequences is crucial for BDNF expression, as shown in a mouse model of Rett syndrome [75]. In this regard, investigation of this issue in zebrafish models may be quite relevant.
The analysis of DNA methylation in the zebrafish CNS also greatly matters when studying the role of hormonal (e.g., steroid) regulation, as well as in the action of various endocrine disruptors. Specifically, methylation of the vitellogenin 1 gene flanking fragment in the zebrafish brain proves to be sensitive to chronic estrogen exposure [76]. The gonadoliberin 3 (GnRH3) gene promoter in the zebrafish telencephalon and olfactory bulb reveals a hypermethylation pattern upon dexamethasone exposure [77]. The effect of the toxic organophosphate TDCIPP on zebrafish larvae leads to increased anxiety-like behavior in adult animals against the background of increasing gene expression of three DNA-methyltransferases, as well as to hypermethylation at promoters of the BDNF and dopamine receptor D4b genes in the brain of female, but not male, zebrafish [78], thus demonstrating sex-dependent toxic effects on the CNS. In zebrafish, epigenetic regulation under exposure to a number of such substances may also be transgenerational in nature. For example, microcystin-leucine arginine, an intracellular toxic endocrine disruptor, enhances promoter methylation (and hence decreases expression) of the BDNF and glutamate carboxylase 1 genes in the brain of F1 generation upon drug administration to F0 generation individuals [79].
CONCLUSIONS
DNA methylation in the brain can alter gene expression of key signaling molecules, receptors, and growth factors, affecting structural changes in neurons and the shaping of new synapses, which is directly related to the plastic properties of the brain (Fig. 2). In addition, DNA methylation plays a pivotal role in brain development since its earliest stages. There has been created a number of genetic and pharmacological zebrafish models of various diseases caused by DNA methylation disorders (Fig. 3), including those induced by ethanol, narcotics, and stress. Zebrafish are also widely used to model psychiatric (schizophrenia, autism) and neurodegenerative (parkinsonism, dementia) diseases associated with DNA methylation disorders in humans. In general, modeling DNA methylation disorders in zebrafish is a promising tool to study and elucidate molecular mechanisms of epigenetic disorders in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases, also providing an opportunity to develop new approaches to their diagnosis and treatment. The accumulated knowledge on the role of DNA methylation in the zebrafish CNS provides a basis for further translational studies in this area, aimed at finding effective therapeutic strategies.
REFERENCES
Mattei AL, Bailly N, Meissner A (2022) DNA methylation: a historical perspective. Trends Genet 38: 676–707.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2022.03.010
Bashirzade AA, Zabegalov KN, Volgin AD, Belova AS, Demin KA, de Abreu MS, Babchenko VY, Bashirzade KA, Yenkoyan KB, Tikhonova MA, Amstislavskaya TG, Kalueff AV (2022) Modeling neurodegenerative disorders in zebrafish. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 138: 104679.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104679
Dang M, Henderson RE, Garraway LA, Zon LI (2016) Long-term drug administration in the adult zebrafish using oral gavage for cancer preclinical studies. Dis Mod Mech 9: 811–820.https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.024166
Wang J, Cao H (2021) Zebrafish and Medaka: important animal models for human neurodegenerative diseases. Intl J Mol Sci 22: 10766.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910766
Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, Muffato M, Collins JE, Humphray S, McLaren K, Matthews L, McLaren S, Sealy I, Caccamo M, Churcher C, Scott C, Barrett JC, Koch R, Rauch GJ, White S, Chow W, Kilian B, Quintais LT, Guerra-Assunção JA, Zhou Y, Gu Y, Yen J, Vogel JH, Eyre T, Redmond S, Banerjee R, Chi J, Fu B, Langley E, Maguire SF, Laird GK, Lloyd D, Kenyon E, Donaldson S, Sehra H, Almeida-King J, Loveland J, Trevanion S, Jones M, Quail M, Willey D, Hunt A, Burton J, Sims S, McLay K, Plumb B, Davis J, Clee C, Oliver K, Clark R, Riddle C, Elliot D, Threadgold G, Harden G, Ware D, Begum S, Mortimore B, Kerry G, Heath P, Phillimore B, Tracey A, Corby N, Dunn M, Johnson C, Wood J, Clark S, Pelan S, Griffiths G, Smith M, Glithero R, Howden P, Barker N, Lloyd C, Stevens C, Harley J, Holt K, Panagiotidis G, Lovell J, Beasley H, Henderson C, Gordon D, Auger K, Wright D, Collins J, Raisen C, Dyer L, Leung K, Robertson L, Ambridge K, Leongamornlert D, McGuire S, Gilderthorp R, Griffiths C, Manthravadi D, Nichol S, Barker G, Whitehead S, Kay M, Brown J, Murnane C, Gray E, Humphries M, Sycamore N, Barker D, Saunders D, Wallis J, Babbage A, Hammond S, Mashreghi-Mohammadi M, Barr L, Martin S, Wray P, Ellington A, Matthews N, Ellwood M, Woodmansey R, Clark G, Cooper J, Tromans A, Grafham D, Skuce C, Pandian R, Andrews R, Harrison E, Kimberley A, Garnett J, Fosker N, Hall R, Garner P, Kelly D, Bird C, Palmer S, Gehring I, Berger A, Dooley CM, Ersan-Ürün Z, Eser C, Geiger H, Geisler M, Karotki L, Kirn A, Konantz J, Konantz M, Oberländer M, Rudolph-Geiger S, Teucke M, Lanz C, Raddatz G, Osoegawa K, Zhu B, Rapp A, Widaa S, Langford C, Yang F, Schuster SC, Carter NP, Harrow J, Ning Z, Herrero J, Searle SM, Enright A, Geisler R, Plasterk RH, Lee C, Westerfield M, de Jong PJ, Zon LI, Postlethwait JH, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Hubbard TJ, Roest Crollius H, Rogers J, Stemple DL (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496: 498–503.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12111
Shin JT, Priest JR, Ovcharenko I (2005) Human-zebrafish non-coding conserved elements act in vivo to regulate transcription. Nucl Acid Res 33: 5437–5445.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki853
Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Heng L, Durbin R, Birney E (2009) EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res 19: 327–335.https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.073585.107
Kim DS, Huh JW, Kim YH, Park SJ, Kim HS, Chang KT (2010) Bioinformatic analysis of TE-spliced new exons within human, mouse and zebrafish genomes. Genomics 96: 266–271.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.08.004
Berma J, Payne E, Hall C (2012) The zebrafish as a tool to study hematopoiesis, human blood diseases, and immune function. Adv Hematol 2012: 425345.https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/425345
Taylor JS, Braasch I, Frickey T, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y (2003) Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res 13: 382–390.https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.640303
Mihaljevic I, Popovic M, Zaja R, Smital T (2016) Phylogenetic, syntenic, and tissue expression analysis of slc22 genes in zebrafish (Danio rerio). BMC Genom 17: 626.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2981-y
McCammon JM, Sive H (2015) Challenges in understanding psychiatric disorders and developing therapeutics: a role for zebrafish. Dis Mod Mech 8: 647–656.https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.019620
Varshney GK, Sood R, Burgess SM (2015) Understanding and editing the zebrafish genome. Adv Gen 92: 1–52.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adgen.2015.09.002
Yushko LV, Kalueff AV, Kotova MM (2023) Experimental models of mitochondrial dysfunction disorders in the pathogenesis of CNS diseases on zebrafish. J Evol Biochem Physiol 59: 2114–2128.
Zhang L, Lu Q, Chang C (2020) Epigenetics in health and disease. Adv Exper Med Biol 1253: 3–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3449-2_1
Gayon J (2016) From Mendel to epigenetics: history of genetics. Comptes Rendus Biol 339: 225–230.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009
Edwards JR, Yarychkivska O, Boulard M, Bestor TH (2017) DNA methylation and DNA methyltransferases. Epigenet Chromatin 10: 23.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-017-0130-8
Hamidi T, Singh AK, Chen T (2015) Genetic alterations of DNA methylation machinery in human diseases. Epigenomics 7: 247–265.https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.14.80
Ren Y (2022) Regulatory mechanism and biological function of UHRF1-DNMT1-mediated DNA methylation. Funct Integr Genom 22: 1113–1126.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-022-00918-9
Qin L, Qiao C, Sheen V, Wang Y, Lu J (2021) DNMT3L promotes neural differentiation by enhancing STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation independent of DNA methylation. Prog Neurobiol 201: 102028.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102028
Gujar H, Weisenberger DJ, Liang G (2019) The roles of human DNA methyltransferases and their isoforms in shaping the epigenome. Genes 10: 172.https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10020172
Younesian S, Yousefi AM, Momeny M, Ghaffari SH, Bashash D (2022) The DNA methylation in neurological diseases. Cells 11: 3439.https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11213439
Pensold D, Reichard J, Van Loo KMJ, Ciganok N, Hahn A, Bayer C, Liebmann L, Groß J, Tittelmeier J, Lingner T, Salinas-Riester G, Symmank J, Halfmann C, González-Bermúdez L, Urbach A, Gehrmann J, Costa I, Pieler T, Hübner CA, Vatter H, Kampa B, Becker AG, Zimmer-Bensch G (2020) DNA methylation-mediated modulation of endocytosis as potential mechanism for synaptic function regulation in murine inhibitory cortical interneurons. Cereb Cortex 30: 3921–3937.https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa009
Sergeeva A, Davydova K, Perenkov A, Vedunova M (2023) Mechanisms of human DNA methylation, alteration of methylation patterns in physiological processes and oncology. Gene 875: 147487.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2023.147487
Hanaki S, Habara M, Shimada M (2021) UV-induced activation of ATR is mediated by UHRF2. Gen Cells 26: 447–454.https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12851
Xavier MJ, Roman SD, Aitken RJ, Nixon B (2019) Transgenerational inheritance: how impacts to the epigenetic and genetic information of parents affect offspring health. Hum Repr Update 25: 518–540.https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz017
Inaba Y, Iwamoto S, Nakayama K (2022) Genome-wide DNA methylation status of Mongolians exhibits signs of cellular stress response related to their nomadic lifestyle. J Phys Anthropol 41: 30.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00305-0
Lunnon K, Harvey J, Smith A, Weymouth L, Smith R, Castanho I, Hubbard L, Creese B, Bresner K, Williams N, Pishva E (2023) Epigenetic insights into neuropsychiatric and cognitive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A DNA co-methylation network analysis. Res Square rs.3.rs-3185734.https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3185734/v1
Abomoelak B, Prather R, Pragya SU, Pragya SC, Mehta ND, Uddin P, Veeramachaneni P, Mehta N, Young A, Kapoor S, Mehta D (2023) Cognitive skills and DNA methylation are correlating in healthy and novice college students practicing Preksha Dhyāna meditation. Brain Sci 13: 1214.https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13081214
Cavalieri V, Spinelli G (2017) Environmental epigenetics in zebrafish. Epigen. Chromat 10: 46.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-017-0154-0
Lakstygal AM, de Abreu MS, Kalueff AV (2018) Zebrafish models of epigenetic regulation of CNS functions. Brain Res Bull 142: 344–351.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.08.022
Swartz ME, Wells MB, Griffin M, McCarthy N, Lovely CB, McGurk P, Rozacky J, Eberhart JK (2014) A screen of zebrafish mutants identifies ethanol-sensitive genetic loci. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 38: 694–703.https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12286
Knecht AL, Truong L, Marvel SW, Reif DM, Garcia A, Lu C, Simonich MT, Teeguarden JG, Tanguay RL (2017) Transgenerational inheritance of neurobehavioral and physiological deficits from developmental exposure to benzo[a]pyrene in zebrafish. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 329: 148–157.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2017.05.033
Jacob J, Ribes V, Moore S, Constable SC, Sasai N, Gerety SS, Martin DJ, Sergeant CP, Wilkinson DG, Briscoe J (2014) Valproic acid silencing of ascl1b/Ascl1 results in the failure of serotonergic differentiation in a zebrafish model of fetal valproate syndrome. Dis Mod Mech 7: 107–117.https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.013219
Wang L, Jiang W, Lin Q, Zhang Y, Zhao C (2016) DNA methylation regulates gabrb2 mRNA expression: developmental variations and disruptions in l-methionine-induced zebrafish with schizophrenia-like symptoms. Genes Brain Behav 15: 702–710.https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12315
Razali K, Othman N, Mohd Nasir MH, Doolaanea AA, Kumar J, Ibrahim WN, Mohamed Ibrahim N, Mohamed WMY (2021) The promise of the zebrafish model for Parkinson’s disease: today’s science and tomorrow’s treatment. Front Genet 12: 655550.https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.655550
Zheng YC, Ma J, Wang Z, Li J, Jiang B, Zhou W, Shi X, Wang X, Zhao W, Liu HM (2015) A Systematic Review of Histone Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 and Its Inhibitors. Medicin Res Rev 35: 1032–1071.https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21350
Meshcheryakova A, Pietschmann P, Zimmermann P, Rogozin IB, Mechtcheriakova D (2021) AID and APOBECs as multifaceted intrinsic virus-restricting factors: emerging concepts in the light of COVID-19. Front Immunol 12: 690416.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.690416
Rai K, Huggins IJ, James SR, Karpf AR, Jones DA, Cairns BR (2008) DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135: 1201–1212.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.042
Popp C, Dean W, Feng S, Cokus SJ, Andrews S, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE, Reik W (2010) Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463: 1101–1105.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08829
Sandweiss AJ, Brandt VL, Zoghbi HY (2020) Advances in understanding of Rett syndrome and MECP2 duplication syndrome: prospects for future therapies. Lancet Neurol 19: 689–698.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30217-9
Klein CJ, Botuyan MV, Wu Y, Ward CJ, Nicholson GA, Hammans S, Hojo K, Yamanishi H, Karpf AR, Wallace DC, Simon M, Lander C, Boardman LA, Cunningham JM, Smith GE, Litchy WJ, Boes B, Atkinson EJ, Middha S, B Dyck PJ, Parisi JE, Mer G, Smith DI, Dyck PJ (2011) Mutations in DNMT1 cause hereditary sensory neuropathy with dementia and hearing loss. Nat Genet 43: 595–600.https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.830
Protic DD, Aishworiya R, Salcedo-Arellano MJ, Tang SJ, Milisavljevic J, Mitrovic F, Hagerman RJ, Budimirovic DB (2022) Fragile X Syndrome: from molecular aspect to clinical treatment. Intl J Mol Sci 23: 1935.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041935
Yamada M, Okuno H, Okamoto N, Suzuki H, Miya F, Takenouchi T, Kosaki K (2023) Diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome by targeted nanopore long-read sequencing. Eur J Med Genet 66: 104690.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104690
Sheikhpour M, Maleki M, Ebrahimi Vargoorani M, Amiri V (2021) A review of epigenetic changes in asthma: methylation and acetylation. Clin Epigenet 13: 65.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-021-01049-x
Browne CJ, Godino A, Salery M, Nestler EJ (2020) Epigenetic mechanisms of opioid addiction. Biol Psychiatry 87: 22–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.027
Vrettou M, Yan L, Nilsson KW, Wallén-Mackenzie Å, Nylander I, Comasco E (2021) DNA methylation of Vesicular Glutamate Transporters in the mesocorticolimbic brain following early-life stress and adult ethanol exposure-an explorative study. Sci Reports 11: 15322.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94739-8
Demidenko O, Barardo D, Budovskii V, Finnemore R, Palmer FR, Kennedy BK, Budovskaya YV (2021) Rejuvant®, a potential life-extending compound formulation with alpha-ketoglutarate and vitamins, conferred an average 8-year reduction in biological aging, after an average of 7 months of use, in the TruAge DNA methylation test. Aging 13: 24485–24499.https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203736
McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D’Alessio AC, Dymov S, Labonté B, Szyf M, Turecki G, Meaney MJ (2009) Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci 12: 342–348.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2270
Xiu J, Li J, Liu Z, Wei H, Zhu C, Han R, Liu Z, Zhu W, Shen Y, Xu Q (2022) Elevated BICD2 DNA methylation in blood of major depressive disorder patients and reduction of depressive-like behaviors in hippocampal Bicd2-knockdown mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119: e2201967119.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201967119
Nguyen M, Stewart AM, Kalueff AV (2014) Aquatic blues: modeling depression and antidepressant action in zebrafish. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 55: 26–39.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.03.003
Babin PJ, Goizet C, Raldúa D (2014) Zebrafish models of human motor neuron diseases: advantages and limitations. Prog Neurobiol 118: 36–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.03.001
Liu Y, Siejka-Zielińska P, Velikova G, Bi Y, Yuan F, Tomkova M, Bai C, Chen L, Schuster-Böckler B, Song CX (2019) Bisulfite-free direct detection of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at base resolution. Nat Biotechnol 37: 424–429.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0041-2
Wu Y, Vasung L, Calixto C, Gholipour A, Karimi D (2023) Characterizing normal perinatal development of the human brain structural connectivity. ArXiv, arXiv: 2308.11836v1.
Zhang C, Hoshida Y, Sadler KC (2016) Comparative epigenomic profiling of the DNA methylome in mouse and zebrafish uncovers high interspecies divergence. Front Genet 7: 110.https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00110
Lee HJ, Lowdon RF, Maricque B, Zhang B, Stevens M, Li D, Johnson SL, Wang T (2015) Developmental enhancers revealed by extensive DNA methylome maps of zebrafish early embryos. Nat Commun 6: 6315.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7315
Kapusta A, Kronenberg Z, Lynch VJ, Zhuo X, Ramsay L, Bourque G, Yandell M, Feschotte C (2013) Transposable elements are major contributors to the origin, diversification, and regulation of vertebrate long noncoding RNAs. PLoS Genet 9: e1003470.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003470
Xin N, Wang DT, Zhang L, Zhou Y, Cheng Y (2022) Early developmental stage glucocorticoid exposure causes DNA methylation and behavioral defects in adult zebrafish. Comp Biochem Physiol Pt C: Toxicol Pharmacol 256: 109301.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2022.109301
Guo W, Han J, Wu S, Shi X, Wang Q, Zhou B (2019) Bis (2-ethylhexyl)-2, 3, 4, 5-tetrabromophthalate affects lipid metabolism in zebrafish larvae via DNA methylation modification. Env Sci Technol 54: 355–363.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05796
Benvenutti R, Gallas-Lopes M, Marcon M, Reschke CR, Herrmann AP, Piato A (2022) Glutamate NMDA receptor antagonists with relevance to schizophrenia: a review of zebrafish behavioral studies. Curr Neuropharmacol 20: 494.https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666210215121428
Zhai G, Jia J, Bereketoglu C, Yin Z, Pradhan A (2022) Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains. Biol Sex Differ 13: 31.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-022-00442-2
McEwen BS, Milner TA (2017) Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain. J Neurosci Res 95: 24–39.https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23809
Young LJ, Pfaff DW (2014) Sex differences in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol 35: 253–254.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.05.005
Chatterjee A, Lagisz M, Rodger EJ, Zhen L, Stockwell PA, Duncan EJ, Horsfield JA, Jeyakani J, Mathavan S, Ozaki Y, Nakagawa S (2016) Sex differences in DNA methylation and expression in zebrafish brain: a test of an extended ‘male sex drive’ hypothesis. Gene 590: 307–316.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2016.05.042
Serikuly N, Alpyshov ET, Wang D, Wang J, Yang L, Hu G, Yan D, Demin KA, Kolesnikova TO, Galstyan D, Amstislavskaya TG, Babashev AM, Mor MS, Efimova EV, Gainetdinov RR, Strekalova T, de Abreu MS, Song C, Kalueff AV (2021) Effects of acute and chronic arecoline in adult zebrafish: Anxiolytic-like activity, elevated brain monoamines and the potential role of microglia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 104: 109977.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109977
Martinowich K, Hattori D, Wu H, Fouse S, He F, Hu Y, Fan G, Sun YE (2003) DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science 302: 890–893.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090842
Xie J, Xie L, Wei H, Li XJ, Lin L (2023) Dynamic regulation of DNA methylation and brain functions. Biology 12: 152.https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020152
Wu H, Coskun V, Tao J, Xie W, Ge W, Yoshikawa K, Li E, Zhang Y, Sun YE (2010) Dnmt3a-dependent nonpromoter DNA methylation facilitates transcription of neurogenic genes. Science 329: 444–448.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190485
Cruceanu C, Kutsarova E, Chen ES, Checknita DR, Nagy C, Lopez JP, Turecki G (2016) DNA hypomethylation of Synapsin II CpG islands associates with increased gene expression in bipolar disorder and major depression. BMC Psychiatry 16: 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0989-0
Zhu Y, Gomez JA, Laufer BI, Mordaunt CE, Mouat JS, Soto DC, LaSalle JM (2022) Placental methylome reveals a 22q13. 33 brain regulatory gene locus associated with autism. Genome Biol 23: 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02613-1
Kohli RM, Zhang Y (2013) TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature 502: 472–479.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12750
Kamstra JH, Løken M, Aleström P, Legler J (2015) Dynamics of DNA hydroxymethylation in zebrafish. Zebrafish 12: 230–237.https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2014.1033
Lister R, Mukamel EA, Nery JR, Urich M, Puddifoot CA, Johnson ND, Lucero J, Huang Y, Dwork AJ, Schultz MD, Yu M, Tonti-Filippini J, Heyn H, Hu S, Wu JC, Rao A, Esteller M, He C, Haghighi FG, Sejnowski TJ, Behrens MM, Ecker JR (2013) Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 341: 1237905.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237905
Jang HS, Shin WJ, Lee JE, Do JT (2017) CpG and non-CpG methylation in epigenetic gene regulation and brain function. Genes 8: 148.https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8060148
Chen L, Chen K, Lavery LA, Baker SA, Shaw CA, Li W, Zoghbi HY (2015) MeCP2 binds to non-CG methylated DNA as neurons mature, influencing transcription and the timing of onset for Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sciences USA 112: 5509–5514.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505909112
Strömqvist M, Tooke N, Brunström B (2010) DNA methylation levels in the 5' flanking region of the vitellogenin I gene in liver and brain of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio)—sex and tissue differences and effects of 17alpha-ethinylestradiol exposure. Aquat Toxicol 98: 275–281.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.02.023
Khor YM, Soga T, Parhar IS (2016) Early-life stress changes expression of GnRH and kisspeptin genes and DNA methylation of GnRH3 promoter in the adult zebrafish brain. Gen Comp Endocrinol 227: 84–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.12.004
Li R, Yang L, Han J, Zou Y, Wang Y, Feng C, Zhou B (2021) Early-life exposure to tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate caused multigenerational neurodevelopmental toxicity in zebrafish via altering maternal thyroid hormones transfer and epigenetic modifications. Environ Pollut 285: 117471.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117471
Xu J, Zhang W, Zhong S, Xie X, Che H, Si W, Tuo X, Xu D, Zhao S (2023) Microcystin-leucine-arginine affects brain gene expression programs and behaviors of offspring through paternal epigenetic information. Sci Total Environ 857: 159032.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159032
Funding
This work was funded by the budget of the Sirius University of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization (A.B.K.), draft preparation (L.V.Yu., A.D.Sh., M.A.R., K.V.A., M.M.K., A.D.V., A.D.A., A.V.K.), discussion and writing a final manuscript version (A.V.K., L.V.Yu., M.A.R., A.D.V., D.A.A., K.V.A., M.M.K.).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
ETHICS APPROVAL
There are no experimental human or animal studies in this paper.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by A. Polyanovsky
Publisher’s Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yushko, L.V., Shevlyakov, A.D., Romazeva, M.A. et al. The Role of DNA Methylation in Zebrafish Models of CNS Diseases. J Evol Biochem Phys 60, 973–987 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093024030104
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093024030104