Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
We agree that the ωc/2 result for the rigid cluster follows from fundamental formulas. However, a crucially important assumption in our case was the proportionality of the mechanical moment of inertia to the moment of the force of the vortex field; i.e., the contribution of each electron to the moment of force is proportional to the square of the distance from the center. For example, universality is not applicable to the same cluster in the field of a solenoid with a finite radius. At the same time, a point solenoid (see [1]) satisfies the condition of universality (but expressed in terms of the magnetic field flux) because its magnetic field vanishes in the exterior.
Next, concerning the behavior of the soft cluster in an alternating magnetic field, there are various scenarios of motion of a complex system of electrons in an external potential and an alternating magnetic field. We suggested [2] that the magnetic field is switched on quite rapidly, ωcτ ≪ 1. Another variant corresponding to the adiabatic limit ωcτ ≫ 1 is illustrated in Fig. 1. In this case, the azimuthal motion of electrons is first induced by the vortex field. Then, cyclotron orbits are formed and drift under the action of the vortex electric field toward the center of the cluster. After the establishment of the magnetic field, the vortex field disappears, whereas the field of the potential well remains; consequently, the azimuthal drift of electrons begins. We emphasize that the cluster in the drift approximation is contracted, holding its structure.
We do not agree that the magnetic field cannot be switched on rapidly. This is likely possible if a superconducting plate screening the external magnetic field or a superconducting ring with a trapped flux is placed above the two-dimensional Wigner cluster. If the superconductor is rapidly transferred to a normal state by, e.g., pulsed laser heating, the magnetic field acting on electrons varies from zero to a finite value in the former case and from a finite value to zero in the latter. Since a laser pulse can be very short, the variation time of the magnetic field can reach the inverse conductivity of the normal sample, i.e., ≤10–14 s for lead. This very low value certainly cannot be achieved in practice because the heating of the sample is a fairly inertial process. Assuming a heating time of 10‒10 s and a field of 0.01 T, we obtain ωcτ = 0.16, which corresponds to the nonadiabatic case.
REFERENCES
R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (California Inst. Technol., CA, 2013), Vol. 2.
M. M. Mahmoodian, M. M. Mahmoodian, and M. V. Entin, JETP Lett. 115, 608 (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by R. Tyapaev
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmoodian, M.M., Mahmoodian, M.M. & Entin, M.V. Reply to Comment on “Theory of a Two-Dimensional Rotating Wigner Cluster” (JETP Letters 115, 608 (2022)). Jetp Lett. 116, 412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136402260166X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136402260166X