Skip to main content
Log in

PET block detector calibration using subtractive clustering algorithm and comparison with hough transform algorithm

  • Application of Computers in Experiments
  • Published:
Instruments and Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detector calibration plays an important role in improving of image quality and increasing performance of positron emission tomography (PET) systems. To achieve this aim, raw data coordinate event-byevent are mapped to the index of the crystal in which the particle is absorbed. We proposed and tested subtractive clustering and Hough transform algorithms to determine crystal peak position and generate an appropriate look-up table. The results show superiority of Hough transform to the subtractive clustering and other methods because this algorithm determines position of all peaks, even in irregular and unclear data. The acquired results can be beneficial for all of the medical imaging instruments such as PET and single-photon emission computed tomography detectors based on pixilated scintillators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nichol, C. and Kim, E., J. Nucl. Med., 2001, vol. 142, p. 1368.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thanos, P.K., Taintor, N.B., Alexoff, D., Vaska, P., Logan, J., Grandy, D.V., Fang, Y., Lee, J.H., Fowler, J.S., and Volkow, N.D., J. Nucl. Med., 2002, vol. 43, p. 1570.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Britz-Cunningham, S.H. and Adelstein, S.J., J. Nucl. Med., 2003, vol. 44, p. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cherry, S.R., Shao, Y., Silverman, R.W., Meadors, K., Siegel, S., Chatziioannou, A., Young, J.W., Jones, W., Moyers, J.C., Newport, D., Boutefnouchet, A., Farquhar, T.H., Andreaco, M., Paulus, M.J., Binkley, D.M., Nutt, R., and Phelps, M.E., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 1997, vol. 44, p. 1161.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Myers, R., Nucl. Med. Biol., 2001, vol. 28, p. 585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatziioannou, A.F., Eur. J. Nucl. Med., 2002, vol. 29, p. 98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park, S.J., Rogers, W.L., Huh, S., Kagan, H., Honscheid, K., Burdette, D., Chesi, E., Lacasta, C., Llosa, G., Mikuz, M., Studen, A., Weilhammer, P., and Clinthorne, N.H., Phys. Med. Biol., 2007, vol. 52, p. 2807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahlbom, M. and Hoffman, E.J., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 1988, vol. 7, p. 264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Young, J.W., Moyers, J.C., and Lenox, M., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 2000, vol. 47, p. 1676.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stonger, K.A. and Johnson, M.T., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 2004, vol. 51, p. 85.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mao, A., Positron Emission Tomograph Detector Module Calibration through Morphological Algorithms and Interactive Correction, Int. Student Techn. Writing Compet. (ISTWC) Winners, Washington, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breuer, J. and Wienhard, K., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 2009, vol. 56, p. 602.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, D., Atkins, B., Lenox, M.W., Castleberry, B., and Siegel, S.B., IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Record, 2006, p. 2458.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, D. and Gremillion, T., IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Record, 2007, p. 2847.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hough, P.V.C., US Patent 3069654, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jain, A.K., Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Vernon, D., Machine Vision, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stockman, G.C. and Agrawala, A.K., Comm. ACM., 1977, vol. 20, p. 820.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Duda, R.O. and Hart, P.E., Comm. ACM., 1972, vol. 15, p. 11.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jang, J.S.R., IEEE Trans. Systems. Man. Cybernetics, 1993, vol. 23, p. 665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Islami Rad, S.Z., Shamsaei Zafarghandi, M., Gholipour Peyvandi R., and Ghannadi Maragheh M., Istrum. Exper. Tech., 2014, vol. 57, p. 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez, H.A., Davalos, A.M., Barbosa E.M., Reyes, B.H., Murrieta, T., Trejo, C.R., Brandan, M.E., and Villafuerte, M.R., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 2008, vol. 596, p. 384.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Z. Islami rad.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islami rad, S.Z., GholipourPeyvandi, R. & Tavakoli, E. PET block detector calibration using subtractive clustering algorithm and comparison with hough transform algorithm. Instrum Exp Tech 59, 75–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441215050061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441215050061

Keywords

Navigation