Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of the Catalog of Individual Sunspots Based on Data from Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative analysis of sunspot sizes in sunspot groups was performed. For this analysis, we used the database of characteristics of individual sunspots and pores according to observations at the Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station (KMAS) and the photoheliographic data from the Debrecen Heliographical Observatory, Hungary (DPD). We found agreement in the full area index for sunspot groups. However, in the DPD data for 1974–2018, the number of groups is ~50% higher than that for the KMAS data. The difference is that there are a large number of groups in the DPD data with an area of 1 mdp or less. We also found a significant difference in the properties of spots and pores of different types within the group. A significant difference in the distribution pattern of the sunspot area, which is the largest in the group Smax and other spots Snomax, was detected. There are two local maxima, \({\text{S}}_{{{\text{spt}}}}^{1}\) ~ 8–10 mdp and \({\text{S}}_{{{\text{spt}}}}^{2}\) ~ 130–180 mdp, in the area distribution of the largest sunspot Smax in the group. The first maximum is associated with the existence of pores and transition spots in which the penumbra is at the formation stage. The second maximum Smax in the distribution is associated with the existence of regular spots. For the remaining spots Snomax in the group, the area distribution function monotonically decreases with increasing area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bumba, V. and Howard, R., The development of sunspot groups and the supergranular pattern, Proc. Sunspot Conf., 1964, vol. 220.

  2. Dmitrieva, M.G., Kopecký, M., and Kuklin, G.V., The supergranular pattern and the stable stages of sunspot groups, Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions, Kiepenheuer, K.O., Ed., Budapest: International Astronomical Union, 1968, vol. 35, pp. 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foukal, P., An explanation of the differences between the sunspot area scales of the Royal Greenwich and Mt. Wilson observatories, and the SOON program, Sol. Phys., 2014, pp. 289, no. 5, pp. 1517–1529.

  4. Gyori, L., Automation of tracking various sunspot group entities and demonstrating its usage on the flaring NOAA AR 11429, Sol. Phys., 2015, vol. 290, pp. 1627–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gyori, L., Baranyi, T., and Ludmány, A., Photospheric data programs at the Debrecen Observatory, The Physics of Sun and Star Spots, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Symposium no. 273, IAU, 2011, pp. 403–407.

  6. Gyori, L., Ludmány, A., and Baranyi, T., Comparative analysis of Debrecen sunspot catalogues, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 2017, vol. 465, pp. 1259–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuklin, G.V., On two populations of sunspot groups, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 1980, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muñoz-Jaramillo, A., Senkpeil, R.R., Windmueller, J.C., et al., Small-scale and global dynamos and the area and flux distributions of active regions, sunspot groups, and sunspots: A multi-database study, Astrophys. J., 2015a, vol. 800, no. 1, id 48.

  9. Muñoz-Jaramillo, A., Senkpeil, R.R., Longcope, D.W., et al., The minimum of solar cycle 23: As deep as it could be?, Astrophys. J., 2015b, vol. 804, no. 1, id 68.

  10. Nagovitsyn, Y.A. and Pevtsov, A.A., On the presence of two populations of sunspots, Astrophys. J., 2016, vol. 833, no. 1, id 94.

  11. Nagovitsyn, Y.A., Pevtsov, A.A., and Livingston, W.C., On a possible explanation of the long-term decrease in sunspot field strength, Astrophys. J. Lett., 2012, vol. 758, no. 1, id L20.

  12. Tlatov, A.G., Vasil’eva, V.V., Makarova, V.V., and Otkidychev, P.A., Applying an automatic image-processing method to synoptic observations, Sol. Phys., 2014, vol. 289, no. 4, pp. 1403–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vitinsky, Yu.I., Kopecky, M., and Kuklin, G.V., Statistika pyatnoobrazovatel’noi deyatel’nosti Solntsa (Statistics of Sunspot Formation Activity), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-02-00098, and the Russian Scientific Foundation, project no. 15-12-20001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Tlatov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by E. Seifina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tlatov, A.G., Skorbezh, N.N., Sapeshko, V.I. et al. Comparative Analysis of the Catalog of Individual Sunspots Based on Data from Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station. Geomagn. Aeron. 59, 793–798 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219070235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219070235

Navigation