Skip to main content
Log in

Two-dimensional models of magma flows in a volcanic conduit taking the magma compressibility and thermal effects into account

  • Published:
Fluid Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two steady-state models of magma flow in a conduit are considered, with and without allowance for magma compressibility. As distinct from studies [{xc1}–{xc6}], in which either simplified equations were solved or unrealistic values of the parameters were used, in the present study the complete systems of equations are solved and the values of the parameters correspond to magma flow in a volcanic conduit. The secondary flows obtained in [{xc5}] for model conditions are not formed when the magma is simulated by an incompressible fluid and all the terms of the equations are taken into account. When the magma compressibility is taken into account, in the isothermal case and for constant magma viscosity the entire flow is adequately described by the one-dimensional isothermalmodel, although this approach is not formally applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.A. Barmin, E.A. Vedeneeva, and O.E. Mel'nik, “Effect of ViscousDissipation on Nonisothermal High-Viscosity Magma Flow in a Volcanic Conduit,” Fluid Dynamics 39(6), 863–873 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. E.A. Vedeneeva, O.E. Mel'nik, A.A. Barmin, and R.S.J. Sparks, “Viscous Dissipation in Explosive Volcanic Eruptions,” Geophys. Research Letters 32, No. 5, L05303.101029/2004GL020954 (2005).

  3. A. Costa and G. Macedonio, “Viscous Heating in Fluids with Temperature-DependentViscosity: Implications for Magma Flows,” Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 10, No. 6, 545–555 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Massol and C. Jaupart, “The Generation of Gas Overpressure in Volcanic Eruptions,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 166, No. 1–2, 57–70 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Costa and G. Macedonio, “Viscous Heating Effects in Fluids with Temperature-Dependent Viscosity: Triggering of Secondary Flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 540, 21–38 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Massol, C. Jaupart, and D.W. Pepper, “Ascent and Decompressions of Viscous Vesicular Magma in a Volcanic Conduit,” J. Geophys. Research 106, No. B8, 16223–16240 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu.B. Slezin, “Dynamics of the Dispersion Regime of Volcanic Eruptions. 2. Flow Rate Instability Condition and Nature of Catastrophic Explosive Eruptions,” Vulkanologiya i Seismologiya, No. 1, 23–35 (1984).

  8. R.S.J. Sparks, M.I. Bursik, S.N. Carey, J.S. Gilbert, H. Sigurdsson, and A.W. Woods, Volcanic Plumes (Wiley, Chichester, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Wilson, R.S.J. Sparks, and G.P.L. Walker, “Explosive Volcanic Eruptions—IV. The Control of Magma Properties and Conduit Geometry on Eruption Column Behavior,” Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 63, No. 1, 117–148 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.W. Woods, “The Dynamics of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions,” Rev. Geophysics 33, No. 4, 495–530 (1995).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.A. Barmin and O.E. Mel'nik, “Eruption Dynamics of High-Viscosity Gas-Saturated Magmas,” Fluid Dynamics 28(2), 195–202 (1993).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A.W. Woods and T. Koyaguchi, “Transition between Explosive and Effusive Eruptions of Silicic Magmas,” Nature 370, No. 6491, 641–644 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. K.U. Hess and D.B. Dingwell, “Viscosities of Hydrous Leucogranite Melts: a Non-Arrhenian Model,” Amer. Mineralogist 81, No. 7, 1297–1300 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Rosi, P. Landi, M. Polacci, A. Di Muro, and D. Zandomeneghi, “Role of Conduit Shear on Ascent of the Crystal-Rich Magma Feeding the 800-year-b.p. Plinian Eruption of Quilotoa Volcano (Ecuador),” Bull. Volcanology 66, No. 4, 307–321 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Polacci, P. Papale, and M. Rosi, “Textural Heterogeneities in Pumices from the Climactic Eruption of Mount Pinatubo, 15 June 1991, and Implication for Magma Ascent Dynamics,” Bull. Volcanology 63, No. 2–3, 83–97 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Jaupart and S. Tait, “Dynamics of Eruptive Phenomena,” Rev. Mineralogy and Geochemistry 24, 213–238 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.V. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow (Hemisphere, McGraw-Hill, New York 1980; Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1984).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J.H. Ferziger and M. Peric, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Tex © E.A. Vedeneeva, 2007, published in Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza, 2007, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 27–38.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vedeneeva, E.A. Two-dimensional models of magma flows in a volcanic conduit taking the magma compressibility and thermal effects into account. Fluid Dyn 42, 528–539 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462807040035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462807040035

Keywords

Navigation