Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perception and the Characteristics of the Response of Honey Bees, Paper Wasps, and Red Wood Ants to a Low-Frequency Electric Field

  • COMPLEX SYSTEMS BIOPHYSICS
  • Published:
Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bees, wasps, and ants have no specialized receptors for the perception of an electric field. An appropriate response to naturally occurring electric fields in bees and ants is associated with atmospheric exposure, amplified by the approach of the front of a thunderstorm. The primary transducers of mechanoreceptors that respond to displacement are related to the perception of low-frequency electric fields of high intensity by insects. The non-specific mechanism of perception of electric fields is based on irritation by induced currents that flow in the locations of their contact with each other and/or conductive surfaces. The frequency dependence of the electric field sensitivity is determined mainly by the magnitude of the current induced by it and the intensity of its contact action. The magnitude of the current induced in the outer part of the insect body is non-linearly related to the frequency of the electric field. The region with the highest sensitivity to electric fields is close to 500 Hz, which is consistent with the maximum magnitude of the induced current. At the same time, the threshold of the sensitivity to an electric field in wasps is approximately 0.04 kV/m, while in bees it is 0.45 kV/m. Ants react to the action of an electric field of 7–10 kV/m by slowing their movement. Magnetic fields and ionization, which accompany the generation of an electric field whose intensity reaches 15–20 kV/m, do not stimulate changes in the behavior of insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. S. Presman, Electromagnetic Fields and Living Nature (Nauka, Moscow, 1968) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. V. Serbant and M. P. Troyanskii, Radiowaves and Living Organism (Znanie, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. P. Dubrov, Geomagnetic Field and Life (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. A. Kholodov, Reactions of the Nervous System to Electromagnetic Fields (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. V. Belyanskii, M. B Golant, and N. D. Devyatkov, Millimeter Waves in Biology (Znanie, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. K. Eskov, Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 123 (3), 195 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. K. Eskov and A. I. Toroptsev, Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol. 15 (5), 500 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. K. Eskov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., No. 1, 135 (1982).

  9. E. K. Eskov, The Dwelings of Insects (Znanie, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. K. Eskov, Ecology of the Honeybee (Russkoe Slovo, Ryazan, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. M. Dlusskii, Ants of the Genus Formica (Nauka, Moscow, 1967) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. K. Dmitrienko and E. S. Petrenko, Ants in Taiga Biocenoses of Siberia (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. A. CHalmers, Atmospheric Electricity (Pergamon, Oxford, 1967; Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1974).

  14. E. K. Eskov, Biophysics (Moscow) 63 (3), 431 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. K. Eskov and A. M. Sapozhnikov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., No. 3, 395 (1979).

  16. E. K. Eskov, Zool. Zh. 64 (4), 606 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. K. Eskov, Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol. 17 (2), 178 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. K. Eskov, Ekologiya, No. 6, 76 (1982).

  19. E. K. Eskov, Acoustic Signaling in Social Insects (Nauka, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. K. Eskov, Russ. J. Ecol. 28 (1), 55 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. K. Eskov, Ethology of the Honeybee (Kolos, Moscow, 1992) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. K. Eskov and A. M. Sapozhnikov, Biofizika 24 (4), 780 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. K. Eskov and N. I. Bragin, Zh. Obshch. Biol. 47 (6), 823 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. K. Eskov and N. I. Bragin, Pchelovodstvo, No. 2, 9 (1986).

  25. U. Warnke and R. Paul, Umschau, No. 3, 415 (1975).

  26. W. E. Caldwell and F. Russo, J. Genet. Physiol. 113 (2), 233 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. M. Walker and M. E. Bitterman, J. Exp. Biol. 145, 489 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. L. Chizhevsky, in Proceedings of the Practical Laboratory for Zoopsychology, Vol. 1 (Moscow, 1928), pp. 42–47 [in Russian].

  29. G. Altman and U. Warnke, Apidologie 2 (4), 309 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Pearson P.T.R., 1963; Mir, Moscow, 1966), Vol. 6, pp. 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. G. Bochkarev, Magnetic Fieds in Space (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Lindauer and H. Martin, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 60, 219 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. E. K. Eskov and G. A. Mironov, Ekologiya, No. 6, 81 (1990).

  34. 34. H. F. Little, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 55, 82 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Autrum and W. Schneider, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 31 (1), 77 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. V. P. Bindokas and B. Grenderg, Dioelectromagnetics 5, 305 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. E. K. Eskov, Biofizika 20 (4), 646 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. K. Eskov and G. A. Mironov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 309 (1), 233 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  39. E. K. Eskov and G.A. Mironov, Biofizika 35 (4), 675 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Friedmann, Electrotechnik und Maschinenbau 91 (10), 510 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Schua, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 34, 258 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Russian State Agricultural Correspondence University, 143900, Balashikha, Moscow oblast, Russia

    E. K. Eskov

Authors
  1. E. K. Eskov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. K. Eskov.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

This paper does not describe studies using humans and animals as objects.

Additional information

Translated by E. Puchkov

Abbreviations: EFs, electric fields; MFs, magnetic fields.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eskov, E.K. Perception and the Characteristics of the Response of Honey Bees, Paper Wasps, and Red Wood Ants to a Low-Frequency Electric Field. BIOPHYSICS 65, 479–486 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350920030045

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350920030045

Search

Navigation