Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal ratio between the average conformational entropy and the average energy of interaction between residues for fast protein folding

  • Molecular Biophysics
  • Published:
Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on available experimental data and using a theoretical model of protein folding, we demonstrate that there is an optimal ratio between the average conformational entropy and the average contact energy per residue for fast protein folding. A statistical analysis of the conformational entropy and the number of contacts per residue for 5829 protein domains from four main classes (α, β, α/β, α+β) shows that each class has its own characteristic average number of contacts per residue and average conformational entropy per residue. These class-specific characteristics determine the protein folding rates: α-proteins are the fastest to fold, β-proteins are the second fastest, α+β-proteins are the third, and α/β-proteins are the last to fold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Finkelstein and A. Ya. Badretdinov, Fold. Des. 2, 115 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. E. Jackson, Fold. Des. 3, R81 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. W. Plaxco, K. W. Simons, and D. Baker, J. Mol. Biol. 277, 985 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. I. Shakhnovich, Fold. Des. 3, R45 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O. V. Galzitskaya, S. O. Garbuzynskiy, D. N. Ivankov, and A. V. Finkelstein, Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 51, 162 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. I. B. Kuznetsov and S. Rackovsky, Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 54, 333 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. N. Ivankov and A. V. Finkelstein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8942 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. I. Guijarro, C. J. Morton, K. W. Plaxco, et al., J. Mol. Biol. 276, 657 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. W. Plaxco, J. I. Guijarro, C. J. Morton, et al., Biochemistry 37, 2529 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Perl, Ch. Welker, Th. Schindler, et al., Nature Struct. Biol. 5, 229 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N. A. J. Van Nuland, F. Chiti, N. Taddei, et al., J. Mol. Biol. 283, 883 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Zerovnik, R. Virden, R. Jerala, et al., Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 32, 296 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Thirumalai, J. Physiq. Orsay Fr. 5, 1457 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. M. Gutin, V. I. Abkevich, and E. I. Shakhnovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5433 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Finkelstein and A. Ya. Badretdinov, Mol. Biol. 31, 391 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Koga and S. Takada, J. Mol. Biol. 313, 171 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O. V. Galzitskaia, D. N. Ivankov, and A. V. Finkelstein, FEBS Lett. 489, 113 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. V. Finkelstein and O. V. Galzitskaya, Phys. Life Rev. 1, 23 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. N. Ivankov, S. O. Garbuzynskiy, E. Alm, et al., Prot. Sci. 12, 2057 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Mirny and E. I. Shakhnovich, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 361 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Punta and B. Rost, J. Mol. Biol. 348, 507 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. G. Murzin, S. E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia, J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. J. Hudson, Statistics. Lectures on elementary statistics and probability (CERN, Geneva, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Taketomi, Y. Ueda, and N. Gô, Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 7, 445 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. R. Fersht, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5, 79 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. R. Fersht, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 3 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Matouschek, J. T. Kellis, Jr., L. Serrano, and A. R. Fersht, Nature 340, 122 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Matouschek, J. T. Kellis, Jr., L. Serrano, et al., Nature 346, 440 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. A. R. Fersht, A. Matouschek, and L. Serrano, J. Mol. Biol. 224, 771 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. V. I. Abkevich, A. M. Gutin, and E. I. Shakhnovich, Biochemistry 33, 10026 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. G. Wolynes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6170 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. O. V. Galzitskaya, A. K. Surin, and H. Nakamura, Protein Sci. 9, 580 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  33. T. P. Creamer and G. D. Rose, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5937 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. P. E. Wright and H. J. Dyson, J. Mol. Biol. 293, 321 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O. B. Ptitsyn, Adv. Protein Chem. 47, 83 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. F. Chiti, P. Webster, N. Taddei, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3590 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. P. M. Harrison, H. S. Chan, S. Prusiner, and F. E. Cohen, J. Mol. Biol. 286, 593 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J. L. Jimenez, J. I. Guijarro, E. Orlova, et al., EMBO J. 18, 815 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.V. Galzitskaya, S.A. Garbuzinskii, 2006, published in Biofizika, 2006, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 622–632.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galzitskaya, O.V., Garbuzinskii, S.A. Optimal ratio between the average conformational entropy and the average energy of interaction between residues for fast protein folding. BIOPHYSICS 51, 554–564 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906040075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906040075

Key words

Navigation