Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shale gas and renewables: divergence or win-win for transatlantic energy cooperation?

  • Published:
Journal of Transatlantic Studies Aims and scope

Abstract

The recent emphasis in Europe on sustainable energy differs from the North American emphasis on fossil fuels as secure and low-cost energy source. Priorities and policies to meet energy security, sustainability and competitiveness goals started to diverge between the transatlantic partners. New alliances formed to address changing market realities, climate change concerns and access to energy in poorer countries. Shale gas and renewables emerged as potential game changers. Instead of driving the transatlantic energy partnership apart, the pursuit of different alliances, policies and technologies explores complementary pathways to meet common goals. The sustained, public and private commitment in the USA to develop and scale up shale gas technology and Europe’s leadership in renewable market transformation provide win-win outcomes for transatlantic as well as global energy cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. International Energy Agency (IEA), Shared Goals, IEA, https://doi.org/www.iea.org/aboutus/whatwedo/sharedgoals/ (accessed on May 20, 2012).

  2. Bryan Walsh, ‘This Rock Could Power The World: Why Shale Can Solve the Energy Crisis’, Time Magazine, April 11, 2011, 177, no. 14, Environmental Special

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Deutch, ‘The Good News About Gas: The Natural Gas Revolution and Its Consequences’, Foreign Affairs 90, no. 1 (2011): 82–93

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), ‘RE-Thinking 2050: Making the EU 100% Renewables-Based’, EREC, https://doi.org/www.rethink-ing2050.eu/ (accessed May 20, 2012)

  5. Price Waterhouse (PwC), ‘Moving towards 100% Renewable Electricity in Europe and North Africa by 2050’, PwC, https://doi.org/www.pwc.com/en_GX/gx/sustainability/research-insights/assets/renewable-electricity-2050.pdf (accessed May 24, 2012)

  6. US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2012 — Early Release Overview’, https://doi.org/www.eia.gov/forecast/aeo/er/(accessed May 20, 2012), 9.

  7. European Commission-Market Observatory for Energy, ‘Key Figures — June, 2011’, https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/energy/observatory/countries/doc/key_figures.pdf (accessed May 20, 2012).

  8. European Commission, Energy 2020 — A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy (Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission, ‘Energy Roadmap 2050’, COM (2011) 885 final, https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/energy/energy2020/roadmap/index_en.htm, (accessed May 24, 2012), 7.

  10. International Energy Forum (IEF), ‘Dialogue Plays a Key Role in Building the International Trust and Understanding Necessary to Achieve Global Energy Security’, IEF, https://doi.org/www.ief.org/about-ief/what-is-the-ief/dialogue.aspx, (accessed May 24, 2012).

  11. US State Department, ‘Major Economies Process for Energy Security and Climate Change’, US State Department, https://doi.org/2001-2009.state.gov/g/oes/climate/mem/index.htm(accessed July 20, 2012).

  12. European Union, ‘EUR-Lex: Directive Establishing a Scheme for Gree Union, https://doi.org/eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003L0087:EN:HTML, (accessed May 30, 2012).

  13. European Commission, Energy 2020, 4.

  14. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), ‘Creation of IRENA’, IRENA, https://doi.org/www.irena.org/menu/index.aspx?mnu=cat&PriMenuID=13&CatID=30 (accessed June 1, 2012).

  15. European Commission, ‘On Security of Energy Supply and International Cooperation —The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond Our Borders’, European Commission, https://doi.org/eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0539:-FIN:EN:PDF (accessed May 20, 2012).

  16. European Commission, ‘Mediterranean Solar Plan, Strategy Paper’, European Commission, https://doi.org/ec.europa.eu/energy/international/international_cooperation/doc/201.02_1.mediterranean_solar_plan_strategy_paper.pdf (accessed May 5, 2012)

  17. Nadejda Komendantovaa and others, ‘Perception of Risks in Renewable Energy Projects: The Case of Concentrated Solar Power in North Africa’, Energy Policy 40 (2012): 103–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IHS Global Insights, The Economic and Employment Contributions of Shale Gas in the United States (Washington, DC: IHS Press, 2012), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howard Rogers, ‘Shale Gas — The Unfolding Story’, Oxfords Review of Economic Policy 27 (2011): 140.

    Google Scholar 

  20. US Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration (US DOE/EIA), ‘World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside the United States’, USDOE/EIA, https://doi.org/www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/ (accessed May 4, 2012).

  21. Clayton M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Florence Gény, ‘Can Unconventional Gas be a Game Changer in European Gas Markets’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, NG 46, December 2010, 24–39.

  23. The US Department of Energy (DOE) initiated an evaluation of the geology and production engineering of non-conventional oil and gas in 1976. In collaboration with the Gas Technology Institute, a private/public consortium of producers, universities, service companies and geological services spent USD 700 million alone on RD&D during the 1978–2004 period, even before development investment by the medium tier oil and gas companies and Majors.

  24. Gény, ‘Can Unconventional Gas’, 56–8.

  25. International Energy Agency (IEA), Are We Entering a Golden Age of Gas? World Energy Outlook 2011 Special Report (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2011), 111.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. RT News, ‘Shaken Plans: Exxon Mobil drops Polish Shale Gas Exploration’, https://doi.org/rt.com/business/news/shale-gas-poland-exploration-179/ (accessed 20 June, 2012).

  27. Gény, ‘Can Unconventional Gas’, 99–101.

  28. International Energy Agency (IEA), Are We Entering, 164.

  29. Jinsheng Wang, David Ryan, and Edward J. Anthony, ‘Reducing the Greenhouse Gas Footprint of Shale Gas’, Energy Policy 39 (2011): 8196–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eleanor Stephenson, Alexander Doukasa, and Karena Shaw, ‘Greenwashing Gas: Might a “Transition Fuel” Label Legitimize Carbon-Intensive Natural Gas Development?’, Energy Policy 46 (2012): 452–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Michelle Michot Foss, ‘The Outlook for US Gas Prices in 2020: Henry Hub at $3 or $10’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, NG 58, December 2011, 60.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. International Energy Agency (IEA), Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas, World Energy Outlook 2012, Special Report on Unconventional Gas (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2012), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. International Energy Agency (IEA), Golden rules for a Golden Age, 10.

  34. International Energy Agency (IEA), Renewables Information 2011 (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2012), 3. The data quotes use the IEA methodology for renewables statistics. Please note that the 13% compared to 16% based on the substitutions methodology used by REN21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. International Energy Agency (IEA), Renewables, 19.

  36. REN21, ‘Renewables 2005 Global Status Report’, https://doi.org/www.ren21.net/Portals/97/documents/GSR/RE2005_Global_Status_Report.pdf (accessed May 20, 2012), 19; International Energy Agency (IEA), ‘Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security’, IEA, https://doi.org/www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/so_contribution.pdf (accessed May 24, 20120).

  37. International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook 2011 (Paris: OECD/IEA, 2011), 510 and 528.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. International Energy Agency (IEA), ‘RD&D Statistics Database’, https://doi.org/www.iea.org/stats/rd.asp (accessed May 2, 2012).

  39. Frankfurt School/UNEP Collaborating Center/Bloomberg New Energy Finance, ‘Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment’, https://doi.org/qualenergia.it/sites/default/files/articolodoc/BloombergNEF_Global%20Trends%20in%20Renewable%20Energy%202012%20.pdf (accessed May 12, 2012).

  40. US Departments of Energy (DOE), ‘DSIRE Database for State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency’, https://doi.org/dsireusa.org/summarymaps/index.cfm?ee=0&RE=1 (accessed May 10, 2012).

  41. US Department of Energy, ‘American Recovery & Reinvestment Act — Renewable Energy Projects’, US Department of Energy, https://doi.org/www1.eere.energy.gov/recovery/index.html.

  42. REN21, ‘Renewables Global Status Report 2012’, REN21, https://doi.org/www.ren21.net/default.aspx?tabid=5434 (accessed June 20, 2012), 60 and 61.

  43. Estimate based on Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU), ‘Monitoring der Kosten und Nutzen der Wirkung des Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien im Strom und Wärmebereich 2011’, https://doi.org/www.bmu.de/erneuerbare_energien/downloads/doc/45801.php; and Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen, Juli 2012, https://doi.org/www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/broschuere_ee_zahlen_bf.pdf (accessed August 20, 2012)

  44. Rebecca Henderson and Richard G. Newell, eds., Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors (Chicago: University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. UNFCCC, ‘The Green Climate Fund — Financial, Technology and Capacity Building Support’, UNFCCC, https://doi.org/cancun.unfccc.int/financial-technology-and-capacity-build-ing-support/new-long-term-funding-arrangements/ (accessed May 24, 2012).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Energy Policy and Sustainable Development, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

    Marianne Haug

Authors
  1. Marianne Haug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Haug.

Additional information

Notes on contributor

Marianne Haug teaches Energy Policy, Energy Markets and Sustainable Development at the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, Germany. She chairs the Advisory Group on Energy at the European Commission and is Senior Research Advisor at the Oxford Institute of Energy Studies, Oxford University. During her professional career as Director at the International Energy Agency (IEA) in Paris, as Director at the World Bank, in Washington, DC, and subsequently as Chairman of the Forum für Zukunftsenergien in Berlin, she has focused on international energy, climate change and development issues in the private and public sector.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haug, M. Shale gas and renewables: divergence or win-win for transatlantic energy cooperation?. J Transatl Stud 10, 358–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2012.734671

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2012.734671

Keywords

Search

Navigation