Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tuition Discounting to Optimize Enrollment and Revenue

  • Forum
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the borders between higher education systems continue to erode and competition for qualified students increases, many institutions are exploring variable pricing options, known in the USA as “tuition discounting.” The goal of tuition discounting is to use institutional funds to attract and retain desired students while maximizing net revenue to the institution. Recent changes in higher education funding and tuition structures in non-US countries have led to interest in how to most effectively allocate institutional aid. This article outlines the basic concepts of tuition discounting, and shares insights for institutions that might be considering this option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cox-Maguire, L. (2007, January). The net or the noose: Develop sustainable financial aid strategies to prevent budgetary troubles. University Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. G., & Pauls, K. (2006). A predictive model of inquiry to enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 47, 935–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 624–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E., & Rogers, K. R. (2006). Shifting the burden: Public and private financing of higher education in the United States and implications for Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 12, 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R., & Butler, N. (2006). The future of European universities: Renaissance or decay? London: Centre for European Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, J., & Butler, L. (2008, January 18). ‘Have not’ colleges need new ways to compete with rich ones. Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, J. (2007, January 18). University heads warn of £10, 000-a-year tuition fees. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siefert, L., & Galloway, F. (2006). New look at solving the undergraduate yield problem: The importance of estimating individual price sensitivities. College and University Journal, 81, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, A. (2006). Grants for students: What they do, why they work. Toronto: Educational Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2007). A global survey of rankings and league tables. In College and university ranking systems: Global perspectives and American challenges. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maguire Associates, Inc., 555 Virginia Road, Suite 201, Concord, Massachusetts, 01742-2727, USA

    Sarah A. Parrott

Authors
  1. Sarah A. Parrott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Parrott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrott, S.A. Tuition Discounting to Optimize Enrollment and Revenue. Tert Educ Manag 14, 261–268 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802246218

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802246218

Search

Navigation