Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of inoculum density of rice root knot nematode on growth of rice cv. Masuli and nematode development

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to examine the effect of initial population density (Pi) of Meloidogyne graminicola on rice cv. Masuli and nematode population development. Sterilised soil was inoculated with second stage juveniles (J2) of M. graminicola to give 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 5 and 10J2/g soil. Plants were grown in sandy loam soil containing pots under free draining conditions to stimulate upland rice production. Plant height and tiller number were unaffected, but root length, panicle number, total panicle length, grain number and weight declined significantly with increasing nematode density. At the highest initial population density (Pi), grain yield was reduced by 97%, but even at a Pi of 0.1 J2/g soil a reduction of 3 1%occurred. The relationship between Pi and relative grain yield fitted to the Seinhorst model was Y = 0.1 + (0.9) (0.3Pi). The J2 population in soil and roots, and root gall index did not differ significantly with inoculum levels. However, the egg density in root differed significantly (P < 0.001) at plant maturity. Pi of 5 J2/g soil had the highest J2 and egg density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker KR, Schmitt DP, Imbriani JL (1985) Nematode population dynamics with emphasis on determining damage potential to crops. In ‘An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne. Vol. II. Methodology’. (Eds KR Barker, CC Carter, JN Sasser) pp. 135–148. (North Carolina State University Graphics: Raleigh, NC, USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge J, Kinsey G, Livingstone S (2000) DFID Rice-wheat soil health project. In ‘Proceedings of a mycology and nematology workshop’. (Eds J Bridge, G Kinsey, S Livingstone) pp. 16–18. (CDRI: Islam bad, Pakistan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge J, Michel L, Plowright RA (1990) Nematodes parasites of rice. In ‘Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture’. (Eds M Lue, RA Sikora, J Bridge) pp. 69–108. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris H (1981) Dynamic action thresholds for diseases induced by nematodes. Annual Review of Phytopathology19, 427–436. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.l9.090181.002235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) ‘Statistical procedures for agricultural research’. 2nd edn. (Johns and Sons: New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey RS, Barker KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp. including a new technique. Plant Disease Reporter57, 1025–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzana OJ, Matamis PP, Mallinin CB, Jose OL, De-leon DS (1998) Cultural management practices to control rice root knot nematode. In ‘Summary of the proceedings of the 1998 regional research and development symposia’, p. 120. (Regional Research and Development Symposia Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research and Development: Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines)

    Google Scholar 

  • Main IH, Khan MMA (1995) Effects of inoculum level on the post penetration development of Meloidogyne graminicola in rice root. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research30, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe JP (1985) Analysis and interpretation of data from nematological experiments. In ‘An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne. Vol. II Methodology’. (Eds KR Barker, CC Carter, JN Sasser). pp. 187–196. (North Carolina State University Graphics: Raleigh, NC, USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowright R, Bridge J (1990) Effects of Meloidogyne graminicola (Nematoda) on the establishment; growth and yield of rice cv. IR36. Nematologica36, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokharel RR (2001) Rice cropping patterns and plant parasitic nematodes. Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences21–22, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad JS, Panwar MS, Rao YS (1987) Nematode problems of rice in India. Tropical Pest Management33, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad JS, Panwar MS, Rao YS (1990) Influence of root knot nematode infection on rice under simulated rainfed lowland conditions. Nematologia Mediterranea18, 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prot JC, Matias DM (1995) Effects of water regime on the distribution of Meloidogyne graminicola and other root-parasitic nematodes in a rice field toposequence and pathogenicity of M. graminicola on rice cultivar UPL Ri5. Nematologica41, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prot JC, Villammeva LM, Gergon EB (1994) The potential of increased nitrogen supply to mitigate growth and yield reductions of upland rice cultivars UPL RiI-5 caused by Meloidogyne graminicola. Fundamental and Applied Nematololgy17, 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler AF (1961) A simple substitute for a Baermann funnel. Plant Disease Reporter45, 747–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinhorst JW (1965) The relationship between nematode density and damage to plants. Nematologica11, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SB, Pande S, Saha M, Kaushal KK, Lai M, Singh M, Singh K, Pokharel R, Upreti RP, Singh K (2001) Plant parasitic nematodes associated with rice and wheat based cropping systems in Nepal. International Journal of Nematology11, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma-Poudyal D, Pokharel RR, Shrestha SM, Khatri-Chhetri GB (2002) Population and effect of rice root knot nematode in diseased and healthy looking rice plants and their distribution in rice field. Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences23, 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma-Poudyal D, Pokharel RR, Shrestha SM, Khatri-Chhetri GB (2004) Evaluation of common Nepalese rice cultivars against rice root knot nematode. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th national conference on science and technology’. (Eds FP Neupane, KM Bajracharya, SB Rajbhandari, KC Sharma, DD Poudel, DMS Amatya, RM Shrestha, AR Bajracharya, D Gyawali, J Shrestha, G Shrestha, BN Uprety, M Ranjit, U Devkota, R Srivastav, K Manandar, TM Pradhananga, S Shrestha) p. 86. (RONAST: Kathamandu, Nepal)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soomro MH, Hauge NGM (1993) Relationship between inoculum density of Meloidogyne graminicola, growth of rice seedling and development of the nematode. Pakistan. Journal of Nematology11, 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano RS, Prot JC, Matias DM (2000) Expression of tolerance for Meloidogyne graminicola in rice cultivars as affected by soil type and flooding. Journal of Nematology32, 309–317.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill DL (1991) Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes in plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology29, 167–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.29.090191.001123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeck WM (1971) A rating scheme for field evaluation of root knot nematode infestations. Pftanzenschutz-Nachrichten. Bayer AG24, 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Sharma Poudyal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poudyal, D.S., Pokharel, R.R., Shrestha, S.M. et al. Effect of inoculum density of rice root knot nematode on growth of rice cv. Masuli and nematode development. Australasian Plant Pathology 34, 181–185 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP05011

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP05011

Additional keyword

Navigation