Abstract
Background, Aims, and Scope
As a consequence of human living and activity, water infiltration to the urban subsurface occurs from a variety of different sources, like precipitation, irrigation, leaking pipes and sewers, septic tanks and rainwater infiltration ponds. This infiltration is strongly related with quality issues of the infiltrated water and further impact on groundwater quality. In order to set up an integrated urban water balance it becomes essential to estimate the infiltration processes, i.e. water flow and solute transport, from these different infiltration sources and to take into account the large spatial variability of sediment properties, the geometric settings of these sources and the groundwater table. For that purpose, the development of simple, physically-based quantification approaches is required in order to establish an efficiently working prediction and risk analysis tool within the framework of an integrated urban water management system. The scope of the presented work was to demonstrate the applicability of the developed approaches at urban scale.
Methods
Since a detailed, three-dimensional, numerical quantification of the infiltration processes within the entire urban area is not possible, the individual sources were considered as independent within the EU AISUWRS project. Different models were developed for balancing infiltration from areal and point sources with respect to the related flow pattern. The analytical model UL_FLOW, based on one-dimensional, steady state analytical solutions, allows the estimation of conservative tracer residence times in layered sediments under varying infiltration rates. The numerical model WSTM, based on a three-dimensional random walk approach, calculates water and solute transport from pipe leaks. Additionally, the sources were classified in accordance to the spatial distribution of the parameters determining the infiltration processes.
Results
UL_FLOW was applied to data sets from the city of Rastatt within a case study of the AISUWRS project. Each neighbourhood of water balance computation by the Urban Volume and Quality Model (UVQ) was defined as an areal infiltration source with unique parameter values for sediment depth, profile and properties, as well as infiltration rate time series. Groundwater recharge and residence time series were computed for each neighbourhood. Relevant statistical parameters obtained by time series analyses from those time series could be mapped by GIS. Point infiltration, particularly from sewers, was classified due to the sediment parameters and the distance to the groundwater table at each source location in order to reduce computational efforts. WSTM computations provided time series of groundwater recharge and tracer breakthrough for some specific cases.
Discussion
The analytical model UL_FLOW provides fast and efficient computation of groundwater recharge and residence times accounting for storage effects within the unsaturated zone of urban areas. The reliability of this model has been shown by cross validation with HYDRUS1D. Because of the high computational effort, WSTM could provide only short-term simulations for some specific parameter sets for which residence time estimates could be derived.
Conclusions
UL_FLOW provides an analytical modelling tool for balancing one-dimensional areal infiltration and estimating residence times under varying conditions including spatial parameter variability. These balances could be used for assessing the impact of those infiltration sources on groundwater quality. The tracer breakthrough from point infiltration sources computed by WSTM could also be used for such kinds of assessment. The larger spatial parameter variability associated with these sources could be handled by classification in GIS environments.
Recommendations and Perspectives
Similar to the areal sources, a simple balance approach for point sources based on analytical solutions needs to be developed for estimating residence times in order to avoid large computational efforts. Such a model would complete the balancing of all kinds of infiltration sources in urban areas efficiently. Since the approaches are based on the balance of the physical processes, they have a large predictive capability and could be included into an integrated urban water balance and management system. The mapping of the statistical values of the residence times provides a tool to compare parts of the urban areas and to visualize differences between urban water management scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett MH, Hiscock KM, Pedley S, Lerner DN, Tellam JH, French MJ (1999): Marker species for identifying urban groundwater recharge sources: A review and case study in Nottingham, UK. Water Res 33, 3083–3097
Brito MG, Costa CN, Almeida JA, Vendas D, Verdial PH (2006): Characterization of maximum infiltration areas using GIS tools. Special Issue Eng Geol 85(1–2) 14–18
Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964): Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Paper No. 3, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Bücker-Gittel M, Mohrlok U, Jirka GH (2003): Modelling unsaturated water transport using a random walk approach. In: Kovar K, Hrkal Z (eds), Calibration and reliability in groundwater modelling — A few steps closer to reality. IAHS publication no. 277, Wallingford, UK, 17–21
Cata C, Mohrlok U (2006): A random-walk model for simulating wastewater transport and transformation in unsaturated Zone. In: Bierkens MFP, Gehrels JC, Kovar K (eds), Calibration and reliability in groundwater modelling: From uncertainty to decision making. IAHS Publication no. 304, 255–260
Eiswirth M (2001): Hydrogeological factors for sustainable urban water systems. In: Current problems of hydrogeology in urban areas, urban agglomerates and industrial centres. Proceedings of NATO Advanced Science Workshop, Baku, Azerbaijan, June 2001, NATO Science Series IV, Vol. 8, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Faye SC, Faye S, Wohnlich S, Gaye CB (2004): An assessment of the risk associated with urban development in the Thiaroye area (Senegal). Environ Geol 45(3) 312–322
Foster SSD, Morris BL, Lawrence AR (1993): Effects of urbanisation on groundwater recharge. In: Proc. of ICE International conference on groundwater problems in urban areas. London, June 1993
Foster SSD, Chilton PJ (2004): Downstream of downtown: Urban wastewater as groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 12(1) 115–120
Klinger J, Wolf L, Schrage C, Schäfer M, Hötzl H (2006): Application to real world problems: A porous aquifer, Rastatt, Germany. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds), Urban water resources toolbox — Integrating groundwater into urban water management. International Water Association, London, 100–143
Lerner DN, Issar AS, Simmers I (1990): Groundwater recharge: A Guide to understanding and estimating natural recharge. IAH International Contributions to Hydrogeology, Vol 8
Mackay D, Webster E (2006): Environmental persistence of chemicals. Env Sci Pollut Res 13(1) 43–49
Matthies M, Klasmeier J, Heß O (2006): GIS-basierte Modellierung von Gewässerimmissionen (GIS-based modeling for water immissions). UWSF — Z Umweltchem Ökotox 18(2) 102–109
Mitchell G, Diaper C, Rahilly M, Del’Oro E (2004): Urban water & contaminant balance model (UVQ). User Manual and Documentation. CSIRO Manufacturing and Infrastructure Technology
Mohrlok U (2005): UL_FLOW 1.0 — Modelling pseudo transient vertical flow in unsaturated layered sediment using a quasi steady state approach, Documentation and User Manual. Appendix to Groundwater Recharge Estimation in Case Study Cities Technical Report no. 820, Institute for Hydromechanics, Universität Karlsruhe
Mohrlok U (2006): Simple Approach for Balancing transient unsaturated soil processes in urban areas by the analytical model UL_FLOW. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds), Urban water resources toolbox — Integrating groundwater into urban water management. International Water Association, London, pp 60–72
Mohrlok U, Bücker-Gittel M, Cata C, Jirka GH (2004): Assessment of wastewater impact on groundwater by hydraulic soil investigations. Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica 32, 328–335
Morris BL, Darling WG, Cronin AA, Rueedi J, Whitehead EJ, Gooddy DC (2006): Assessing the impact of modern recharge on a sandstone aquifer beneath a suburb of Doncaster, UK. Hydrogeol J 14(6) 979–997
Reynolds JH, Barrett MH (2003): A review of the effects of sewer leakage on groundwater quality. J Chart Inst Water E 17(1) 34–39
Richards LA (1931): Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics 1, 318–333
Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MTh, Šejna M (2005): The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variablysaturated media, version 3.0. Department of Environmental Science, University of California, Riverside, California
Thomas A, Tellam J (2006): Modelling of recharge and pollutant fluxes to urban groundwaters. Sci Total Environ 360(1–3) 158–179
Wolf L, Klinger J, Held I, Hötzl H (2006): Integrating groundwater into urban water management. Water Sci Technol 54(6–7) 395–403
Wolf L, Klinger J, Hötzl H, Mohrlok U (2007): Quantifying Mass Fluxes from Urban Drainage Systems to the Urban Soil-Aquifer System. J Soils Sediments 7(2) 85–95
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohrlok, U., Wolf, L. & Klinger, J. Quantification of infiltration processes in urban areas by accounting for spatial parameter variability. J Soils Sediments 8, 34–42 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.05.225
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.05.225