Skip to main content
Log in

First-person perspective and sociomaterial decentering: Studying technology from the standpoint of the subject

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article argues for systematically including human subjectivity and the first-person perspective in the theoretical and methodological framework of the social studies of technology. The first part of the analysis explores how the subjective dimension of human life is conceptually articulated in science and technology studies and discusses efforts within this field to overcome the dichotomy between human beings and technology. On this basis, the case is put for refining the conceptual inclusion of human subjectivity and agency, showing why this requires the first-person perspective and offering an outline of guiding principles for studying technology from the standpoint of the subject. The argument illustrates how a first-person perspective can overcome individualistic positions and opens up a situated, decentered and social-symmetrical epistemology that also embraces the analysis of the power and materialized action of technological artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A sophisticated discussion of contemporary theories of subjectivity can be found in Blackman et al, 2008.

References

  • Ashworth, P. (2008) Conceptual foundations of qualitative psychology. In: J.A. Smith (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L.R. (1998) The first-person perspective: A test for naturalism. American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (4): 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D. and Walkerdine, V. (2008) Creating subjectivities. Subjectivity 22: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1992) Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearly. In: A. Pickering (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (1999) The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, O. (2003) Subjectivity and Social Practice. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, O. (2008) Psychotherapy in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2009) The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1999) Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 56/57. Frankfurt/M: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Højgaard, L. and Søndergaard, D.M. (2011) Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology 21 (3): 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Højholt, C. (2006) Knowledge and professionalism: From the perspectives of children? Critical Psychology 19: 81–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1983) Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt/M: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1991) Experience of the self and scientific objectivity. In: C.W. Tolman and W. Maiers (eds.) Critical Psychology. Contributions to an Historical Science of the Subject. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (2013) Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In: E. Schraube and U. Osterkamp (eds.) Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject: Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 233–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huniche, L. (2009) Existential concerns in families with Huntington's disease: Towards an understanding of the person in social practice. Theory & Psychology 19 (1): 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1913) Logische Untersuchungen. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1968) Phänomenologische Psychologie. Husserliana IX. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993) We have Never been Modern. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999) Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83 (3): 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. (2012) The Subjectivity of Participation: Articulating Social Work Practice with Youth in Copenhagen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, D.E. (2007) Technology Matters: Questions to Live with. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterkamp, U. (2009) Knowledge and practice in critical psychology. Theory & Psychology 19 (2): 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer, G. (1994) Critique of the Foundations of Psychology: The Psychology of Psychoanalysis, Translated by M. Apprey. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E. (1998) Auf den Spuren der Dinge. Psychologie in einer Welt der Technik. Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E. (2003) The politics of TechKnowledge: An experimental moment in psychology. In: N. Stephenson, H.L. Radtke, R. Jorna and H.J. Stam (eds.) Theoretical Psychology: Critical Contributions. Toronto: Captus University Publications, pp. 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E. (2009) Technology as materialized action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology 19 (2): 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E. and Osterkamp, U. (eds.) (2013) Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject: Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1999) Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (2002) Consciousness and Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1996) The First-Person Perspective and other Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.R. and Marx, L. (1994) Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, N. and Papadopoulos, D. (2006) Analysing Everyday Experience: Social Research and Political Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. (1900) Die psychologische Arbeit des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, insbesondere in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie und Pathologie 2 (6): 413–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2005) The Critique of Psychology. From Kant to Postcolonial Theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen, M. (1984) The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber, Translated by Christopher Macann. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1978) Psychoanalytic Politics: Freud's French Revolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1994) Constructions and reconstructions of self in virtual reality: Playing in the MUDs. Mind, Culture, and Activity 1 (3): 158–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2005) the Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why we Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotzky, L.S. (1987) Thinking and speech. In: R.W. Rieber and A.S. Carton (eds.) The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1. Problems of General Psychology, Translated by N. Minick. New York: Plemum Press, pp. 37–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1989) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (3): 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1897) Outlines of Psychology, Translated by C.H. Judd. New York: Stechert.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2008) Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schraube, E. First-person perspective and sociomaterial decentering: Studying technology from the standpoint of the subject. Subjectivity 6, 12–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.28

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.28

Keywords

Navigation