Abstract
Azmi Bishara’s Palestine: Matters of Truth and Justice is essential reading for understanding Palestine today. Initially, the book was supposed to be an English translation of a lecture on what Bishara calls the Trump–Netanyahu deal. Fortunately for the English reader, the lecture is now upgraded with eight chapters that build on decades of Bishara’s political and intellectual engagement with the question of Palestine. These chapters contextualize Trump’s so-called “deal of the century” within the longer history of the region and its geopolitical transformations. The task is ambitious but wonderfully executed. One leaves the book with a deeper understanding of contemporary developments, informed by the weight of history, and with a vision for justice in Palestine/Israel.
Addressing all these dimensions in one symposium, let alone one contribution, is impossible. I will therefore focus on a specific topic that runs through the book, namely, the politics of memory in Palestine/Israel. In his introduction, Bishara notes that the book's different themes will be discussed in conjunction "with the questions of memory and forgetting" (p. 9). Below I will discuss four of these themes: the theoretical framework of settler colonialism, Bishara’s analysis of the Trump–Netanyahu deal, Palestinian resistance to the deal, and Bishara’s vision of justice in Palestine/Israel.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Despite explicitly buying into the Zionist narrative, the “Peace to Prosperity” plan echoes the same claims made during the Oslo accords about leaving the past aside. “Reciting past narratives about the conflict is unproductive,” reads the document, and “the solution must be forward-looking.” (White House 2020, p. 10). Here is yet another inconsistency one can add to the many others Bishara identifies: It asks the “parties” to leave the past narratives aside while taking the Zionist narrative as its point of departure.
References
Agha, H. 2018 ‘We must liberate our thinking from the Oslo straitjacket’: An interview with Hussein Agha’, Fathom Journal, 8. Available at: https://fathomjournal.org/oslo25-we-must-liberate-our-thinking-from-the-oslo-straitjacket-an-interview-with-hussein-agha/
Bashir, B., and R. Busbridge. 2019. The Politics of Decolonisation and Bi-Nationalism in Israel/Palestine. Political Studies 67(2): 388–405.
Bashir, B., and A. Goldberg, eds. 2018. The Holocaust and the Nakba: A New Grammar of Trauma and History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bruyneel, K. 2021. Settler Memory: The Disavowal of Indigeneity and the Politics of Race in the United States. Chapel Hill.
David, L. 2020. The Past Can’t Heal Us: The Dangers of Mandating Memory in the Name of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farsakh, L., ed. 2021. Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization beyond Partition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Frisch, H. 2002. Ethnicity or Nationalism? Comparing the Nakba Narrative amongst Israeli Arabs and Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. Israel Affairs 9(1–2): 165–184.
Hill, T. 2005. Historicity and the Nakba Commemorations of 1998. Working Paper. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/3768 (Accessed: 25 March 2022).
Khalili, L. 2007. Heroes and Martyrs of Palestine: The Politics of National Commemoration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khoury, N. 2016. National Narratives and the Oslo Peace Process: How peacebuilding paradigms affect conflicts over history. Nations and Nationalism 22(3): 465–483.
Khoury, N. 2021. Transitional Justice in Palestine/Israel: Whose justice? Which transition? In Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization beyond Partition, 153–172. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Maddison, S. 2019. The Limits of the Administration of Memory in Settler Colonial Societies: The Australian Case. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 32(2): 181–194.
Park, A.S.J. 2022. Settler Colonialism and the South African TRC: Ambivalent Denial and Democratisation Without Decolonisation. Social & Legal Studies 31(2): 216–237.
Rouhana, N. 2017. Decolonization as Reconciliation: Rethinking the National Conflict Paradigm in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41(4): 642–662.
Rouhana, N., and A. Sabbagh-Khoury. 2019. Memory and the Return of History in Settler-Colonial Context: The Case of the Palestinians in Israel. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 21(1): 527–550.
Sabbagh-Khoury, A. forthcoming. ‘Memory for Forgetfulness: Conceptualizing a Memory Practice of Settler Colonial Disavowal’, Theory and Society [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09486-0.
Savir, U. 1998. The Process. New York: Vintage Books.
Shenhav, Y. 2012. Beyond the Two State Solution: A Jewish Political Essay. Cambridge: Polity Press.
White House. 2020. ‘Peace To Prosperity: A Vision To Improve The Lives Of The Palestinian And Israeli People’. Available at: trumpwhitehouse. archives.gov/peacetoprosperity.
Wolfe, P. 2006. Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research 8(4): 387–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khoury, N. Settler colonialism, memory politics, and the Trump–Netanyahu deal. Int Polit 61, 385–391 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00527-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00527-8