Abstract
This article explores the global campaign against slavery carried out by the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society (the BFASS) during the nineteenth century. The BFASS strove to frame British anti-slavery as exportable to settings abroad, including the USA, Brazil, Spain, and the Netherlands. Drawing on a range of primary sources—including newsletters, meeting minutes, and memos—this article unpacks how the BFASS repurposed the British anti-slavery movement into the global anti-slavery movement. In pursuit of this aim, the BFASS was a flawed organization that adopted positions toward Britain’s naval effort to suppress the trade of enslaved persons in the Atlantic and the North’s campaign within the American Civil War incongruous with its commitment to abolitionism. Accordingly, the article explores why the organization adopted policy positions that contradicted its professed mission.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840, by Henry Beckford. Accessible at https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw00028/The-Anti-Slavery-Society-Convention-1840.
As Forclaz notes: “late-nineteenth-century anti-slavery organizations combined traits of humanitarian pressure groups and imperial propagandistic agencies” (9).
See Sharp (1783), An Essay on Slavery.
“Immediatism” refers to the ideological position that the anti-slavery movement should pursue sudden and decisive policies to abolish the practice.
Quote recorded in the Anti-Slavery Reporter, accessed in Teall (1897).
See summary paper titled “Emancipation,” accessed through the UK National Archive’s online portal.
Journal entry by Joseph Sturge, December 31, 1835, in Tyrrell (1987, 63–64).
Founding Charter of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, page 1.
See Williams 1994, 258. The author’s endnotes suggest that by the 1850s some abolitionists (including early BFASS organizer Fowell Buxton) had shifted their views in support of the state’s policy of forcible suppression.
References
Anstey, Roger. 1980. Anti-slavery, religion, and reform: Essays in memory of Roger Anstey. Connecticut: Wm Dawson & Sons Ltd.
Brain, Jessica. 2021. The Sons of Africa. Historic UK: The History Magazine and Accommodation Guide.
Brown, Christopher Leslie. 2006. Moral capital: Foundations of British abolitionism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Forclaz, AmaliaRibi. 2015. Humanitarian imperialism: The politics of anti-slavery activism, 1880–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Founding Charter. April 17–18, 1839. The British and foreign anti-slavery Society.
Goodwin, Jeff, and James M. Jasper. 2003. Editors introduction. In The social movements reader: Cases and concepts, 3rd ed., ed. Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper. London: Wiley Blackwell.
Heartfield, James. 2016. The British and foreign anti-slavery society, 1836–1956: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hernon, Joseph M. 1967. British sympathies in the American civil war: A reconsideration. The Journal of Southern History 33 (3): 356–367.
Huzzey, Richard. 2012. The moral geography of British anti-slavery responsibilities. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 22: 111–139.
Huzzey, Richard. 2017. Review work(s): The British and foreign anti-slavery society, 1838–1957: A history by James Heartfield. Victorian Studies 59 (4): 698–700.
Jenkins, Craig J. 1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 527–553.
Kaplan, Cora. 2007. Review: Commemorative history without guarantees. History Workshop Journal 64: 389–397.
Kaufman, Chaim D., and Robert A. Pape. 1999. Explaining costly international moral action. International Organization 53 (4): 631–668.
Keck, Kathryn Sikkink, and Margaret E. Keck. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lorimer, Douglas A. 1976. The role of anti-slavery sentiment in English reactions to the American civil war. The Historical Journal 19 (2): 405–420.
Martinez, Jenny S. 2012. The slave trade and the origins of international human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.
Office of The American Anti-Slavery Society. 1840. Letter, Representative J.A. Collins to the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society.
Office of The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. 1852. The Sugar Duties and the Emancipated Colonies. Letter to the Right Honourable the Earl of Derby, Her Majesty’s First Lord of the Treasury, Etc.
Office of The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. 1853. Letter from L.A. Chamerovzow to American abolitionists. University of Manchester Archives.
Office of The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. 1861. The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society and The American Question. Letter to the Prime Minister, Lord Palmerson.
Oldfield, J.R. 2013. Transatlantic abolitionism in the age of revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peterson, M.J. 1992. Transnational activity, international society and world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21 (3): 371–388.
Proceedings of Anti-Slavery Convention. 1840. Called by the Committee of The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. Published by the University of London.
Proceedings of Anti-Slavery Convention. 1843. Called by the Committee of The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. Published by the University of London.
Quirk, Joel. 2011. The anti-slavery project: From the slave trade to human trafficking. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Richards, Jake Christopher. 2018. Anti-slave-trade law, ‘liberated Africans’ and the state in the south Atlantic world. Past and Present 241 (1): 179–219.
Ryan, Charlotte, and William A. Gamson. 2015. Are frames enough? In The social movements reader: Cases and concepts, 3rd ed., ed. Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper, 136–142. London: Wiley Blackwell.
Sharp, Granville 1783. An essay on slavery. Burlington: Printed and Sold by Isaac Collins.
Slavery and the Internal Slave Trade in the United States of North America. 1841. The British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society. Published by the University of London.
Teall, J. Eastoe. 1897. A brief account of the results of granting compensation to the West Indian slaveholders, and the continuance of slavery under the name ‘apprenticeship’, In The British and foreign anti-slavery society’s slavery in British protectorates, London, 1897.
The British and foreign anti-slavery society reporter. 1841. January 27 2(2): 17–32.
The British and foreign anti-slavery society reporter. 1842. January 26 3(2): 10–16.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Temperley, Howard. 1972. British antislavery, 1833–1870. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Turley, David. 1980. Free air and fugitive slaves: British abolitionists versus government over American fugitives. In Anti-slavery, religion, and reform. Essays in Memory of Roger Anstey. Connecticut: Wm Dawson & Sons Ltd.
Turley, David. 1991. The culture of English antislavery, 1780–1860. London: Routledge.
Tyrell, Alex. 1987. Joseph Sturge and the moral radical party in early Victorian Britain. London: Christopher Helm Publishers Ltd.
United Kingdom National Archives. 2018. Emancipation. Accessed at http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/slavery/pdf/emancipation.pdf
Williams, Eric. (1944; reis., 1994). Capitalism and slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
For helpful comments and advice, the author thanks Joseph Young, Diane Singerman, Boaz Atzili, Jaclyn Fox, the journal’s anonymous reviewers, and the American University library staff. This manuscript benefitted from audience feedback at American University’s 2019 Tri-School Doctoral Research Conference.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Timmerman, M.N. Going global: British abolitionists and the campaign to export anti-slavery. Int Polit 60, 62–75 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00369-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00369-2