Skip to main content
Log in

Global Liquidity: Drivers, Volatility and Toolkits

  • Keynote Address
  • Published:
IMF Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global liquidity refers to the volumes of financial flows—largely intermediated through global banks and non-bank financial institutions—that can move at relatively high frequencies across borders. The amplitude of responses to global conditions like risk sentiment, discussed in the context of the global financial cycle, depends on the characteristics and vulnerabilities of the institutions providing funding flows. Evidence from across empirical approaches and using granular data provides policy-relevant lessons. International spillovers of monetary policy and risk sentiment through global liquidity evolve in response to regulation, the characteristics of financial institutions, and actions of official institutions around liquidity provision. Strong prudential policies in the home countries of global banks and official facilities reduce funding strains during stress events. Country-specific policy challenges, summarized by the monetary and financial trilemmas, are partially alleviated. However, risk migration across types of financial intermediaries underscores the importance of advancing regulatory agendas related to non-bank financial institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bruno and Shin (2015) also highlight the financial channel of exchange rates working through banks, focusing attention on the specific mechanisms through which changes in currency value engage with institutional features to influence credit flows.

  2. The Bank for International Settlements and other institutions are also active in collecting some of these granular data from across countries, and the countries are investing in even more granular collections and associated repositories.

  3. For details on the complexity of these financial conglomerates, see Cetorelli and Goldberg (2014), Correa and Goldberg (2022), and a summary by Buch and Goldberg (2022) of a broader groups of studies through the International Banking Research Network and published in the Journal of Banking and Finance

  4. See for example, Obstfeld et al. (2005), Klein and Shambaugh (2015), and Obstfeld et al. (2019). Countries with flexible exchange rates have comparative interest rate independence, shielding themselves more from the contractionary output effects of higher interest rates abroad. Goldberg (2013) shows that this autonomy depends partially on the globalization of credit provision through banks.

  5. A rich parallel literature directly considers monetary policy spillovers across borders, looking at credit flows as a complement to work considering interest rate independence and other work on the effects of economic news and announcements.

  6. See also Rey (2016), Rey (2014), Rey (2017).

  7. IMF 15th Annual Research Conference on “Exchange Rates and Financial Globalization”

  8. Goldberg and Krogstrup (2023) discuss the shortcomings of prior constructions and the reasons for their specific construction of the EMP.

  9. The magnitudes of country-specific interventions, even given similar stress levels, also vary across episodes. For example, during the GFC, China accumulated considerable reserves and prevented approximately 15 percent appreciation against the USD, while during the COVID Crisis, interventions played a much smaller role for the renminbi/dollar exchange rate (Goldberg and Kalisa 2022).

  10. This exhibit is inspired by the type of graphics provided in BIS (2022). I extend this visual in multiple directions, including to bank and non-bank global liquidity providers, with bank and non-bank borrowers, and broader categories of cross-border flows.

  11. With this schematic, the implication across decades of developments in policy and technology will be considered in Sect. 3.1.

  12. While domestic banks and hosted foreign banks both intermediate funds to non-bank borrowers in Country A, this form of intermediation is not part of global liquidity.

  13. See Goldberg (2007) for implications of the entry of foreign banks and Buch and Goldberg (2020) for a broader discussion of the benefits and costs of global banking.

  14. See Bussière et al. (2021).

  15. Goldberg and Ravazzolo (2022) consider separately data for mutual funds and EFTs invested in bonds and equities across countries.

  16. Some banking organizations may also have used a variety of legal entities, such as asset-backed-commercial paper vehicles, to arbitrage regulations and increase risk-taking (Gong et al. 2018).

  17. Other research efforts use securities-level data to reclassify investors and borrowers by nationality instead of residency. See Maggiori et al. (2020) and Coppola et al. (2021).

References

  • Adrian, Tobias, and Hyun Song Shin. 2008. Liquidity and Financial Cycles. Working Paper 256, Bank for International Settlement.

  • Adrian, Tobias, and Hyun Song Shin. 2010. Liquidity and Leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation 19 (3): 418–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avdjiev, Stefan, Leonardo Gambacorta, Linda S. Goldberg, and Stefano Schiaffi. 2020. The Shifting Drivers of Global Liquidity. Journal of International Economics 125: 103324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avdjiev, Stefan, Leonardo Gambacorta, Linda S. Goldberg, and Stefano Schiaffi. 2023. Differences in Global Liquidity Drivers for Advanced and Emerging Economies.

  • Beck, Thorsten, Consuelo Silva-Buston, and Wolf Wagner. 2023. The Economics of Supranational Bank Supervision. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 58 (1): 324–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, Ben S. 2017. Federal Reserve Policy in an International Context. IMF Economic Review 65 (1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. 2022. BIS Quarterly Review, September 2022: International Banking and Financial Market Developments.

  • Boz, Emine, Camila Casas, Georgios Georgiadis, Gita Gopinath, Helena Le Mezo, Arnaud Mehl, and Tra Nguyen. 2022. Patterns of Invoicing Currency in Global Trade: New Evidence. Journal of International Economics 136: 103604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandao-Marques, Luis, Gaston Gelos, Machiko Narita, and Erlend Nier. 2020. Leaning Against the Wind: A Cost Benefit Analysis for an Integrated Policy Framework. IMF Working Paper No. 20/123, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

  • Bruno, Valentina, and Hyun Song Shin. 2015. Capital Flows and the Risk-Taking Channel of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 71 (1): 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Claudia, and Linda Goldberg. 2020. Global Banking: Toward an Assessment of Benefits and Costs. Annual Review of Financial Economics 12 (1): 141–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Claudia M., and Linda S. Goldberg. 2017. Cross-Border Prudential Policy Spillovers: How Much? How Important? Evidence from the International Banking Research Network. International Journal of Central Banking 48: 505–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Claudia M., and Linda S. Goldberg. 2020. Global Banking: Toward an Assessment of Benefits and Costs. Annual Review of Financial Economics 12: 141–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Claudia M., and Linda S. Goldberg. 2022. Complexity and Riskiness of Banking Organizations: Evidence from the International Banking Research Network. Journal of Banking and Finance 134: 106244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussière, Matthieu, Jin Cao, Jakob de Haan, Robert Hills, Simon Lloyd, Baptiste Meunier, Justine Pedrono, Dennis Reinhardt, Sonalika Sinha, Rhiannon Sowerbutts, et al. 2021. The Interaction Between Macroprudential Policy and Monetary Policy: Overview. Review of International Economics 29 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, Gerard, Daniela Klingebiel, Luc Laeven, and Guillermo Noguera. 2005. Banking Crisis Database. Systemic Financial Crises 341: 360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstens, Agustín. 2021. Non-Bank Financial Sector: Systemic Regulation Needed. BIS Quarterly Review.

  • Cesa-Bianchi, Ambrogio, Robert Czech, and Fernando Eguren-Martin. 2023. Dash for Dollars. Working Paper.

  • Cetorelli, Nicola, and Linda S. Goldberg. 2012. Liquidity Management of US Global Banks: Internal Capital Markets in the Great Recession. Journal of International Economics 88 (2): 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetorelli, Nicola, and Linda S. Goldberg. 2014. Measures of Global Bank Complexity. FRBNY Economic Policy Review 20 (2): 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • CGFS. 2011. Global Liquidity-Concept, Measurement and Policy Implications. Committee on the Global Financial System.

  • CGFS, BIS. 2020. US Dollar Funding: An International Perspective. CGFS Papers 65, Bank for International Settlements.

  • Chari, Anusha, Karlye Dilts Stedman, and Christian Lundblad. 2022. Global fund flows and emerging market tail risk. Working Paper 30577, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Choi, Mark, Linda S. Goldberg, Robert Lerman, and Fabiola Ravazzolo. 2022. The Fed’s Central Bank Swap Lines and FIMA Repo Facility. Economic Policy Review 28 (1): 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Benjamin H., Dietrich Domanski, Ingo Fender, and Hyun Song Shin. 2017. Global Liquidity: A Selective Review. Annual Review of Economics 9 (1): 587–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Nathan, Eduardo Levy-Yeyati, and Tomas Williams. 2020. How ETFs Amplify the Global Financial Cycle in Emerging Markets. Technical Report 1268, Federal Reserve Board.

  • Coppola, Antonio, Matteo Maggiori, Brent Neiman, and Jesse Schreger. 2021. Redrawing the Map of Global Capital Flows: The Role of Cross-Border Financing and Tax Havens. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 136 (3): 1499–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, Ricardo, and Linda S. Goldberg. 2022. Bank Complexity, Governance, and Risk. Journal of Banking and Finance 134: 106013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Douglas W., Hu. Yunzhi, and Raghuram G. Rajan. 2020. The Spillovers from Easy Liquidity and the Implications for Multilateralism. IMF Economic Review 68: 4–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. 2022. The International Role of the Euro Report. Technical report, European Central Bank.

  • Fleming, Michael J, and Asani Sarkar. 2014. The Failure Resolution of Lehman Brothers. FRBNY Economic Policy Review 176–206.

  • Flood, Mark D., Dror Y. Kenett, Robin L. Lumsdaine, and Jonathan K. Simon. 2020. The Complexity of Bank Holding Companies: A Topological Approach. Journal of Banking and Finance 118: 105789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, Kristin J., and Francis E Warnock. 2021. Capital Flow Waves-or Ripples? Extreme Capital Flow Movements Since the Crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 116(C): 1–24.

  • FSB. 2019. Global Monitoring Report on Non-Bank Financial Intermediation. Financial Stability Board Report 2019.

  • FSB. 2021. Global Monitoring Report on Non-Bank Financial Intermediation. Financial Stability Board Report 2021: 16.

  • Goldberg, Linda S. 2007. Financial Sector FDI and Host Countries: New and Old Lessons. FRBNY Economic Policy Review 13 (1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Linda S. 2013. Banking Globalization, Transmission, and Monetary Policy Autonomy. Working Paper 19497, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Goldberg, Linda S., and Stone B. Kalisa. 2022. Do Exchange Rates Fully Reflect Currency Pressures? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics.

  • Goldberg, Linda S., and Signe Krogstrup. 2023. International Capital Flow Pressures and Global Factors. Journal of International Economics 142: 103749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Linda S, Robert Lerman, and Dan Reichgott. 2022. The US Dollar’s Global Roles: Revisiting Where Things Stand. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics.

  • Goldberg, Linda S., and April Meehl. 2020. Complexity in Large US Banks. Economic Policy Review 26 (2): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Linda S, and Fabiola Ravazzolo. 2022. The Fed’s International Dollar Liquidity Facilities: New Evidence on Effects. Working Paper 29982, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Goldberg, Linda S., and Cédric. Tille. 2008. Vehicle Currency Use in International Trade. Journal of International Economics 76 (2): 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Linda S., and Cédric. Tille. 2009. Micro, Macro, and Strategic Forces in International Trade Invoicing. Journal of International Economics 102 (1): 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Di., Harry Huizinga, and Luc Laeven. 2018. Nonconsolidated Affiliates, Bank Capitalization and Risk Taking. Journal of Banking and Finance 97: 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, Gita, Emine Boz, Camila Casas, Federico J. Díez, Pierre-Olivier. Gourinchas, and Mikkel Plagborg-Møller. 2020. Dominant Currency Paradigm. American Economic Review 110 (3): 677–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, Gita, Oleg Itskhoki, and Roberto Rigobon. 2010. Currency Choice and Exchange Rate Pass-Through. American Economic Review 100 (1): 304–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier et al. 2012. Global Imbalances and Global Liquidity. Asia Economic Policy Conference 305–340.

  • Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier. 2023. International Macroeconomics: From the Great Financial Crisis to the Great Lockdown, and Beyond. IMF Economic Review 71 (1): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier., Hélène. Rey, and Maxime Sauzet. 2019. The International Monetary and Financial System. Annual Review of Economics 11 (1): 859–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. 2001. Concluding Remarks by the Acting Chairman of the IMF Executive Board Macroprudential Indicators Executive Board Meeting. June.

  • IMF. 2020. Toward an Integrated Policy Framework. Technical Report No 2020/046, International Monetary Fund.

  • IMF 2022. The review of the institutional view on the liberalization and management of capital flows, IMF Policy Paper (March) https://PPEA2022008.pdf

  • Jiang, Zhengyang, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Hanno Lustig. 2018. Foreign Safe Asset Demand for US Treasurys and the Dollar. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108: 537–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordà, Òscar., Moritz Schularick, Alan M. Taylor, and Felix Ward. 2019. Global Financial Cycles and Risk Premiums. IMF Economic Review 67 (1): 109–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalemli Ozcan, Sebnem. 2019. U.S. Monetary Policy and International Risk Spillovers. Proceedings of the Jackson Hole Symposium.

  • Klein, Michael W., and Jay C. Shambaugh. 2015. Rounding the Corners of the Policy Trilemma: Sources of Monetary Policy Autonomy. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7: 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, Luc, and Fabian Valencia. 2013. Systemic Banking Crises Database. IMF Economic Review 61 (2): 225–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggiori, Matteo. 2017. Financial Intermediation, International Risk Sharing, and Reserve Currencies. American Economic Review 107 (10): 3038–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggiori, Matteo, Brent Neiman, and Jesse Schreger. 2020. International Currencies and Capital Allocation. Journal of Political Economy 128 (6): 2019–2066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niepmann, Friederike, Tim Schmidt-Eisenlohr, and Emily Liu. 2021. The Effect of US Stress Tests on Monetary Policy Spillovers to Emerging Markets. Review of International Economics 29 (1): 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, Maurice. 2014. Exchange Rates and Financial Globalization. November, IMF 15th Annual Research Conference November 13-14, 2014.

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, Jonathan Ostry, and Mahvash Qureshi. 2019. A Tie That Binds: Revisiting the Trilemma in Emerging Market Economies. The Review of Economics and Statistics 101 (2): 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, Jay C. Shambaugh, and Alan M. Taylor. 2005. The Trilemma in History: Tradeoffs Among Exchange Rates, Monetary Policies, and Capital Mobility. The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (3): 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, and Alan M Taylor. 2005. Global Capital Markets: Integration, Crisis, and Growth. Cambridge University Press.

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, and Alan M. Taylor. 2017. International Monetary Relations: Taking Finance Seriously. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (3): 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, and Haonan Zhou. 2022. The Global Dollar Cycle. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.

  • Ostry, Jonathan D., Atish R. Ghosh, Marcos Chamon, and Mahvash S. Qureshi. 2012. Tools for Managing Financial-Stability Risks from Capital Inflows. Journal of International Economics 88 (2): 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogliani, Pamela, Goetz von Peter, and Philip Wooldridge. 2022. The Outsize Role of Cross-Border Financial Centres. BIS Quarterly Review.

  • Rajan, Raghuram. 2018. The Spillovers from Easy Liquidity and its Implications for Multilateralism. November, Mundell-Fleming Lecture at the Nineteenth Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference of the International Monetary Fund.

  • Reinhart, Carmen M, and Kenneth S Rogoff. 2009. This Time is Different. Princeton University Press.

  • Reinhart, Carmen M., and Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2011. The Forgotten History of Domestic Debt. The Economic Journal 121 (552): 319–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, Hélène. 2014. The International Credit Channel and Monetary Autonomy. November, Mundell-Fleming Lecture at the Fifteenth Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference of the International Monetary Fund.

  • Rey, Hélène. 2016. International Channels of Transmission of Monetary Policy and the Mundellian Trilemma. IMF Economic Review 64: 6–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, Hélène. 2017. Global Financial Cycle. November, Presentation at the Eighteenth Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference of the International Monetary Fund.

  • Rodrik, Dani. 2000. How Far Will International Economic Integration Go? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (1): 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Kenneth, and Maurice Obstfeld. 1996. Global Foundations of International Macroeconomics. MIT Press.

  • Schoenmaker, Dirk. 2011. The Financial Trilemma. Economics Letters 111 (1): 57–59.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmaker, Dirk, and Sander Oosterloo. 2005. Financial Supervision in an Integrating Europe: Measuring Cross-Border Externalities. International Finance 8 (1): 1–27.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Hyun Song. 2012. Global Banking Glut and Loan Risk Premium. IMF Economic Review 60 (2): 155–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda S. Goldberg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Special thanks to Viral Acharya, Stefan Avdjiev, Claudia Buch, Matthieu Bussiere, Anusha Chari, Leonardo Elias, Fulvia Fringuellotti, Leonardo Gambacorta, Helene Rey, and Stefano Schiaffi for content discussions and feedback. Stone Kalisa and Oliver Hannaoui provided excellent teamwork and research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldberg, L.S. Global Liquidity: Drivers, Volatility and Toolkits. IMF Econ Rev 72, 1–31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-023-00208-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-023-00208-9

JEL Classification

Navigation