Skip to main content
Log in

cultivating the edge: an ethnography of first-generation women farmers in the American Midwest

  • Article
  • Published:
Feminist Review

abstract

In the US, an emergent cultural icon of resistant agriculture, the agrarian heroine, attests to growing popular interest in first-generation women farmers. Drawing on practice theory, historical geographical materialism, intersubjective ethnography and feminist scholarship, this ethnography focusses on three first-generation women farmers growing organic vegetable crops for the Chicago market, with critical attention to the body, the land and their uses. By applying permaculture’s theory of ‘the edge’ anthropologically, this study explores the work these women do to cultivate relational spaces that promote fluidity, diversity and solidarity in opposition to industrial agriculture and the homogenising forces of globalisation. The portraits that emerge problematise popular representations of first-generation women farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Source: Photograph courtesy of Nicholas Peterson.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While ‘new’ describes entrant farmers, often children of established farmers beginning their own operations, I use ‘first-generation’ instead to specify farmers whose parents did not farm, following the convention of family farmers termed ‘third-’ or ‘eighth-generation’, etc..

  2. Scholars such as Laura-Anne Minkoff-Zern and Michael Twitty are working to address this gap (Brahinsky et al., 2014; Twitty, 2015).

  3. ‘Conventional’ is commonly used to distinguish ‘alternative’ agriculture from industrial agriculture.

  4. The terms ‘field’ and ‘fieldwork’ are differently defined by social scientists and agriculturalists. As a social scientist studying agriculture, I respect both disciplines by using these terms unmodified, allowing each to illuminate the other. Usage is implied through context, and I hope any confusion this causes the reader is more productive than distracting.

  5. The Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service (MOSES) is a non-profit organisation promoting ‘organic and sustainable agriculture by providing the education, resources and expertise farmers need to succeed’, and the conference it organises is commonly called, simply, MOSES; MOSES, http://mosesorganic.org [last accessed 10 August 2014].

  6. Second-wave feminism did not fully consider the roles and needs of non-white and poor women (hooks, 1984), while the 1960s era back-to-the-land movement largely ignored the central problem of rural blacks: landlessness (Smith, K.K., 2014).

  7. FarmHer, http://www.farmher.com/ [last accessed 19 July 2014].

  8. The Girls Scouts is an organisation founded in 1912 to empower girls through outdoor survival skill education; Girl Scouts, ‘Our history’, https://www.girlscouts.org/who_we_are/history/ [last accessed 14 August 2014].

  9. Jimmy John’s is a regional fast-food chain.

  10. Instagram, ‘Softnucks’, https://instagram.com/softnucks/ [last accessed 16 July 2014].

  11. ‘KFC’ refers to Kentucky Fried Chicken, a global fast-food franchise.

references

  • Adams, J., 1991. “Woman’s place is in the home”: the ideological devaluation of farm women’s work. Anthropology of Work Review, 12(4), pp. 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, L. and Skeggs, B., eds., 2004. Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, D., 2011. Preface. In G. Bell, ed. The Permaculture Way: Practical Steps to Create a Self-Sustaining World. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W., 1996 [1977]. The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

  • Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., 2001. Masculine Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brahinsky, R., Sasser, J. and Minkoff-Zern, L., 2014. Race space and nature: an introduction and critique. Antipode, 46(5), pp. 1135–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregendahl, C., and Hoffman, M., 2010. Women, Land, and Legacy: Change Agents and Agency Change in Iowa: Evaluation Results. Ames: Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M.S., 2012. The Sociology of Food and Agriculture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J.G., 2009. A New Heartland Women, Modernity, and the Agrarian Ideal in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chicagoland, 2014. TV, CNN. 10 April.

  • Christian, S., 2014. Think you know what a farmer looks like? Think again. YES! Magazine, 17 April. Available at: http://www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/think-you-know-what-a-farmer-looks-like-think-again [last accessed 20 April 2014].

  • Crapanzano, V., 2003. Reflections on hope as a category of social and psychological analysis. Cultural Anthropology, 18(1), pp. 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W., 1991. Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Csordas, T.J., ed., 1994. Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K., 2014. Unlocking the power of women farmers. The Guardian, June 12. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/jun/12/women-farmers-world-food-programme [last accessed 18 June 2014].

  • DeLind, L.B., 2014. Coming to terms with urban agriculture: a self-critique. In N.M. Domingos, J.M. Sobral and H.G. West, eds. Food Between the Country and the City: Ethnographies of a Changing Global Foodscape. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjarlais, R., and Throop, C.J., 2011. Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, pp. 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., 2010. The gender revolution: uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24(2), pp. 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem, H. and Stamoulis, K., 2011. Women in Agriculture: Closing the Gender Gap. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Green Heron Tools, 2011. Hergonomic. Green Heron Tools, 4 October. Available at: http://www.greenherontools.com/hershovel_hergonomic.php [last accessed 23 August 2014].

  • Guthman, J., 1998. Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: the codification of California organic agriculture. Antipode, 30(2), pp. 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J., 2015. From forests to styrofoam: the changing socio-nature of strawberry production. Conference paper presented at 2015 AFHVS/ASFS Conference: Bridging the Past, Cultivation the Future, 24–28 June. Chatham University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.J., 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., 2000. Spaces of Hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, S., 2011. Sepp Holzer’s Permaculture: A Practical Guide to Small-Scale, Integrative Farming and Gardening. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b., 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Cambridge: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. and Korb, P., 2013. Characteristics of Women Farm Operators and Their Farms, EIB-111. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, Z.M., 2012. The Midwest Farmer’s Daughter: In Search of an American Icon. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., 1998. Minima Ethnographica: Intersubjectivity and the Anthropological Project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaysing, B., 1971. The Ex-Urbanites Complete & Illustrated Easy-Does-It First-Time Farmer’s Guide: A Useful Book. San Francisco: Straight Arrow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. and Molnár, V., 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, pp. 167–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A., 1989 [1949]. A Sand County Almanac: and Sketches Here and There. Special commemorative edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L., and Meyer, K., 1995. Economic decline, gender, and labor flexibility in family-based enterprises: Midwestern farming in the 1980s. Social Forces, 74(2), pp. 575–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L., and Meyer, K., 2001. The great agricultural transition: crisis, change, and social consequences of twentieth century US farming. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, pp. 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matchar, E., 2013. Chick lit is dead, long live farm lit. The Atlantic, 13 May. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/05/chick-lit-is-dead-long-live-farm-lit/275643/ [last accessed 3 August 2014].

  • McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, 1987. 42 U.S.C. 11411-11412, July 22. Washington DC: United States Government Publishing Office.

  • McNay, L., 2004. Agency and experience: gender as a lived relation. In L. Adkins and B. Skeggs, eds. Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M., 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, 2014a. 2012 Census drilldown: beginning farmers and ranchers. National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, 28 May. Available at: http://sustainableagriculture.net/blog/2012census-bfr-drilldown/ [last accessed 29 May 2014].

  • National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, 2014b. 2012 Census drilldown: minority & women farmers. National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, 3 June. Available at: http://sustainableagriculture.net/blog/census-drilldown-sda/ [last accessed 4 June 2014].

  • Nearing, H., 1990 [1970]. The Good Life: Helen and Scott Nearing’s Sixty Years of Self-Sufficient Living. New York: Schocken Books.

  • Ortner, S., 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), pp. 126–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S., 1996. Making Gender. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A., 2012a. Fertile ground: intro to ecofeminist thought. Bitch Media, 4 April. Available at: https://bitchmedia.org/post/fertile-ground-intro-to-ecofeminist-thought [last accessed 4 July 2014].

  • Parker, A., 2012b. Fertile ground: farming for feminism. Bitch Media, 9 April. Available at: https://bitchmedia.org/post/fertile-ground-women-feminism-food-farming-femivore-eco [last accessed 4 July 2014].

  • Rotenberk, L., 2013. Breaking the grass ceiling: on US farms, women are taking the reins. Grist, 3 June. Available at: http://grist.org/food/breaking-the-grass-ceiling-on-u-s-farms-women-are-taking-the-reins/ [last accessed 8 December 2013].

  • Sachs, C.E., 1983. The Invisible Farmers: Women in Agricultural Production. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S., 1992. Prairie Patrimony: Family, Farming, and Community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S., 2003. From hometown to nontown: rural community effects of suburbanization. Rural Sociology, 68(1), pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V., 1993. Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. London: Zed Books Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.M., 2014. Oh, heck yes: check out these farm tools for women. Grist, 11 July. Available at: http://grist.org/food/oh-heck-yes-check-out-these-farm-tools-for-women/ [last accessed 16 July 2014].

  • Smith, K.K., 2014. W.E.B. Du Bois: Racial inequality and alienation from nature. In P.F. Cannavò and J.H. Lane, eds. Engaging Nature: Environmentalism and the Political Theory Canon. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, J., Carré, D. and Jackson, W., 1990. Ecological impact of modern agriculture. In C.R. Carroll, J.H. Vandermeer and P. Rosset, eds. Agroecology. New York: McGraw Hill, pp. 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, T.B., 2005. Chicago Dreaming: Midwesterners and the City, 1871-1919. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troublesome Creek: A Midwestern, 1995. Documentary film. Directed by S. Ascher and J. Jordan. USA: West City Films.

  • Tsing, A., 2012. Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species. Environmental Humanities, 1, pp. 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twitty, M., 2015. Afroculinaria. Available at: http://afroculinaria.com/ [last accessed 30 June 2015].

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2014. 2012 Census of Agriculture: United States Summary and State, AC-12-A-51. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS), 2016a. Charts and maps: corn: planted acreage by county. USDA-NASS, 21 April. Available at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Crops_County/cr-pl.php [last accessed 1 November 2016].

  • United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS), 2016b. Charts and maps: soybeans: planted acreage by county. USDA-NASS, 21 April. Available at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Crops_County/sb-pl.php [last accessed 1 November 2016].

  • van der Ploeg, J.D., 1993. Potatoes and knowledge. In M. Hobart, ed. The Growth of Ignorance: An Anthropological Critique of Development. London: Routledge, pp. 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

acknowledgments

My gratitude to Harry G. West, Jakob Klein, Jayita Battacharya, Barley Blighton, Wendy Springer, the anonymous reviewers and the editors for their invaluable guidance, and to Jeffery Bivens for his photographs. I am indebted to all the farmers, named and unnamed, who made this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Larmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larmer, M. cultivating the edge: an ethnography of first-generation women farmers in the American Midwest. Fem Rev 114, 91–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-016-0018-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-016-0018-7

keywords

Navigation