Skip to main content
Log in

Educational Game on Cryptocurrency Investment: Using Microeconomic Decision-Making to Understand Macroeconomics Principles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gamification is an effective strategy for motivating and engaging users, which is grounded in business, marketing, and management by designing games in nongame contexts. Gamifying education, which consists of the design and study of educational games, is an emerging trend. However, the existing classroom games for understanding macroeconomics have weak connections to the microfoundations of individual decision-making. We design an educational game on cryptocurrency investment for understanding macroeconomic concepts in microeconomic decisions. We contribute to the literature by designing game-based learning that engages students in understanding macroeconomics in incentivized individual investment decisions. Our game can be widely implemented in online, in-person, and hybrid classrooms. We also reflect on strategies for improving the user experience for future educational game implementations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Qualtrics is a web-based software in which users can design surveys and collect answers without programming skills (Qualtrics, Provo, UT).

  2. We refer the readers to Jacobson et al. (2022) for a more comprehensive survey evaluating the effectiveness of different active learning techniques on different learning objectives.

References

  • Ao, Ziqiao, Gergely Horvath, and Luyao Zhang. 2022. Are Decentralized Finance Really Decentralized? Asocial Network Analysis of the Aave Protocol on the Ethereum Blockchain. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08401.

  • Barro, Robert J., and David B. Gordon. 1983. Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 12(1): 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buterin, Vitalik. 2013. Ethereum Whitepaper. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/.

  • Crockett, A.D. 1994. Rules Versus Discretion in Monetary Policy. In A Framework for Monetary Stability, ed. W. de Beaufort, S.C.W. Eijffinger, and L.H. Hoogdium165–184. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dichev, Christo, and Darina Dicheva. 2017. Gamifying Education: What is Known, What is Believed and What Remains Uncertain: A Critical Review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14(1): 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dichev, Christo, Darina Dicheva, Galia Angelova, and Gennady Agre. 2014. Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. https://www.wssu.edu/profiles/dichevc/gamification-in-education-systematicmapping-study.pdf.

  • Fang, Fan, Carmine Ventre, Michail Basios, Leslie Kanthan, David Martinez-Rego, Wu. Fan, and Lingbo Li. 2022. Cryptocurrency Trading: A Comprehensive Survey. Financial Innovation 8(1): 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, F., and B. Weickmann. 2019. Set: A Protocol for Baskets of Tokenized Assets. https://www.setprotocol.com/pdf/setprotocolwhitepaper.pdf.

  • Fischer, S. 1990. Chapter 21 Rules Versus Discretion in Monetary Policy. Handbook of Monetary Economics 2: 1155–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, Juho. 2019. Gamification. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. G. Ritzer and C. Rojek1–3. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Sarah A., Luyao Zhang, and Jiasheng Zhu. 2022. The Right Tool for the Job: Matching Activelearning Techniques to Learning Objectives. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03393.

  • Kydland, Finn E., and Edward C. Prescott. 1977. Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy 85(3): 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Yulin, and Luyao Zhang. 2022. Cryptocurrency Valuation: An Explainable AI Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.12893.

  • Liu, Yulin, Luyao Zhang, and Yinhong Zhao. 2022. Deciphering Bitcoin Blockchain Data by Cohort Analysis. Scientific Data 9(1): 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moinas, Sophie, and Sébastien. Pouget. 2016. The Bubble Game: A Classroom Experiment. Southern Economic Journal 82(4): 1402–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Ger, Pablo, Daniel Burgos, Iván. Martínez-Ortiz, José Luis. Sierra, and Baltasar Fernández-Manjón. 2008. Educational Game Design for Online Education. Computers in Human Behavior 24(6): 2530–2540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reknes, Iselin, Gintare Visockaite, Andreas Liefooghe, Andrey Lovakov, and Ståle. V. Einarsen. 2019. Locus of Control Moderates the Relationship between Exposure to Bullying Behaviors and Psychological Strain. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, S.T. 1981. Macroeconomic Policy Rules Versus Discretion: Some Analytical Issues. Journal of Public Policy 1(4): 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, Oliver James, Nathan Gerard Jayy Hughes, Sebastian Deterding, Anders Drachen, James Alfred Walker, and David Zendle. 2019. Ethereum Crypto-Games: Mechanics, Prevalence, and Gambling Similarities, in Chi Play ’19: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. New York: ACM, 379-389.

  • Serada, Alesja, Tanja Sihvonen, and J. Tuomas Harviainen. 2020. Cryptokitties and the New Ludic Economy: How Blockchain Introduces Value, Ownership, and Scarcity in Digital Gaming. Games and Culture 16(4): 457–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, Robert J. 2015. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, Frutuoso G. M. 2019. Practical Methodology for the Design of Educational Serious Games. Information 11(1): 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulos, Dimitrios, and Agoritsa Makri. 2017. The Effect of Games and Simulations on Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14(1): 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, William C., Sharon L. O’Hare, and Robert L. Andrews. 1992. The Stock Market Game: Classroom Use and Strategy. The Journal of Economic Education 23(3): 236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Jialing, Sophie Parks, and Junjie Shang. 2020. To Learn Scientifically, Effectively, and Enjoyably: A Review of Educational Games. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2(2): 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Luyao, and Yulin Liu. 2021. Optimal Algorithmic Monetary Policy. Papers 2104: 07888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Luyao, Tianyu Wu, Saad Lahrichi, Carlos Gustavo Salas-Flores, and Jiayi Li. 2022a. A Data Science Pipeline for Algorithmic Trading: A Comparative Study of Applications for Finance and Cryptoeconomics. In 2022a IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain). IEEE, 298-303.

  • Zhang, Yufan, Zichao Chen, Yutong Sun, Yulin Liu, and Luyao Zhang. 2022b. Blockchain Network Analysis: Acomparative Study of Decentralized Banks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05632.

  • Zhang, Luyao Sunshine. 2023. The Design Principle of Blockchain: An Initiative for the Sok of Soks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00479.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Sarah Jacobson for her insightful comments. We thank Tianyu Wu for his assistance in delivering the reflection survey of the educational game. We also benefited from the comments of participants at the SciEcon Seminar Spring 2021. This research is supported by the Teaching and Assessment Grant and Faculty Community for Active Learning Program, Duke Kunshan University and National Science Foundation China for the project “Trust Mechanism Design on Blockchain: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Game Theory, Reinforcement Learning, and Human-AI Interactions,” where Luyao Zhang is the principal investigator. This research was approved by the Internal Review Board (IRB) at Duke Kunshan University. Jiasheng Zhu contributed to the research as an advisee of Prof. Luyao Zhang at Duke Kunshan University. Both Jiasheng Zhu and Luyao Zhang are also with SciEcon CIC, an NPO aiming at cultivating interdisciplinary research of both profound insights and practical impacts. We thank anonymous referees and editors at the Special Issue on Cryptocurrency of Eastern Economic Journal, one of the Palgrave Journals, part of Springer Nature for their professional and thoughtful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Zhang, L. Educational Game on Cryptocurrency Investment: Using Microeconomic Decision-Making to Understand Macroeconomics Principles. Eastern Econ J 49, 262–272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-023-00240-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-023-00240-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation